That said, I would wear a shoe like this in the office or to a meeting or deposition, but not to court.

I find the styles very hit or miss – sometimes classic in a good way, sometimes shapeless, sometimes too trendy or cheap-looking. And they seem to be moving away from the classic suiting looks lately. But I’ve had good experiences with the suits I’ve bought from them in the past, as well as with simple sweaters (not pure cotton cardis but ones with silk/synthetic fibers). And they generally offer multiple pieces (long jacket, short jacket, skirt and at least one pair of pants) in a given suiting line, so if you like the fabric of a suit you can usually find pieces that will flatter your body type.

And when I was briefly getting into the 12-14P size, I LOVED that they had the women’s petites, which were fitted to take into account my curvier shape so I didn’t have to have every single waist taken in.

I’m an attorney (litigator turned corporate) and I think the shoes are perfectly appropriate for just about anything except for a jury trial.

No, I am not paid by Talbots!!

http://www.dsw.com/dsw_shoes/catalog/product.jsp?index=15&category=&prodId=193909&brand=Tahari

And I find Talbots clothes to wear well. Caveat – their cotton cardis really dusk up and/or wash out in color due to the cotton at the dry cleaners. Too bad, as the cardi with vertical ribbing at the placket really was a go to and godsend for traveling – until I needed to have it cleaned. So look at material content closely gals. Love their new style, as it is just that – stylish at last. Waiting for the red tweed pencil skirt to hit the stores, didn’t care for the matching suit jacket. Would it be too much as a full on suit? Last month’s “Real Simple” magazine had adorable suits in it, a full article on that and most were retro classic without being boring…but pricey. Any alternatives to suggest?