Weekly News Roundup

Liking these posts? Follow us on Twitter or like us on Facebook — this is the edited version of what we’re reading! (We also Tweet if we hear about a good sale through our CorporetteDeals Twitter feed.)

- Second City Style rounds up some bags you may have seen in summer movies.  My favorite:  Julianne Moore’s Bottega Vennetta from Crazy Stupid Love (available at Saks for $2580).

- How is your “executive presence”? The WSJ notes that some leaders have it naturally — and others need image makeovers to get there.

- You might want to rethink your morning routine: a study cited in the Harvard Business Review finds that for women, an increase in personal grooming time is associated with lower earnings. (Hat tip: WSJ’s The Juggle.)  Speaking of which, Sally at Already Pretty wonders: can you be pretty AND smart?  Why must you choose?

- Start-ups by women are on the rise, Crain’s New York Business reports — huzzah!  (Congrats to Hoseanna cofounders Tracey and Katrina for their shout-out in the Crain’s piece!)

- Boss steal your idea again?  Fortune has some advice.

- Mint tells us how to know when you need a financial advisor.  Meanwhile, Lifehacker rounds up the top 5 personal finance tools for your desktop.

- Finally: If you haven’t yet, don’t forget to enter the Linea Pelle/Corporette giveaway!

Did we miss anything?  Post ‘em here.

Comments

  1. Aidan says:

    That research on personal grooming and earnings really frosts me. Correlation does not prove causation- the grooming is not the reason for the income changes. Think of the other factors involved- age, natural beauty, minority/non-minority status, region, occupation. There is likely to be many factors at play and those researchers have not explored the most likely issues.

    • I call B.S. on the HBR coverage of that study. Even a cursory glance at the original report shows that this is a classic case of confusing correlation with causation. The original report does not claim that an increase in grooming time *causes* lower earnings for women; it simply says they are associated with lower earnings and then goes on to say that more research is needed to explore the causal link.

      Shame on you, HBR.

  2. lostintranslation says:

    This. I was being nerdy and contemplating the experiment the researchers would need to be able to determine causality in this case but yikes (at my nerdiness and at the statements being thrown around in that article).

  3. PT lawyer says:

    I need some feedback on my PT job. Its always been very PT — my boss initially wanted/promised 15-20 hours a week, but its always been more like 5-10/week. This summer has been extremely slow — I have billed 4 hours so far in August, total. Except for one very busy week, June and July were the same.
    I have little kids and I work from home so this “very PT” thing works for me, BUT I would like to work/bill more than I have been — more like the 15-20 hrs/wk. that was initially promised. What irks me is that I feel very out of the loop — the firm hired TWO new associates this summer! I’ve consistently asked for more work, contacted clients, etc., and I only found out about the 2 new hires via group (cc’d) emails. I’m wondering if I’m being frozen out — but what is there to freeze? I’ve always been the “leftovers” person, and I’m guessing the summer was slow all around. My boss and I have a good rapport too.
    So, I guess my issue is — how/should I deal with this? I’m not ready to go back to work FT (and lucky enough to not have to, financially). I admit that this job is kinda back-burner/keeping the resume alive until the kids are in school. I’m wondering if its administratively too difficult for my boss to keep me around? I also don’t want to be The Whiner — “gimme work, gimme work, why did you hire them” etc.

    • PT lawyer says:

      ^^^ I should add that my reviews are uniformly positive, both from the boss and from clients. I’m just confused? challenged? mystified? by the slow summer and lack of communication.

  4. This web-site is certainly rather helpful considering that I’m when using the second developing an online floral web site inspite of the fact that I’m only commencing out like a result it is truly relatively little, nothing in any way similar to this internet site. Can web site link to some from the posts appropriate here because they are fairly. Many many thanks considerably. Zoey Olsen

  5. A powerful share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit analysis on this. And he in truth bought me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If attainable, as you grow to be expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Massive thumb up for this blog publish!

  6. After research just a few of the weblog posts in your web site now, and I actually like your means of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site checklist and shall be checking again soon. Pls take a look at my website as effectively and let me know what you think.

  7. Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It’s going to always be stimulating to read content from other writers and follow somewhat something from their store. I�d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don�t mind. Natually I�ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

  8. SEO Fresh says:

    Hey there this is somewhat of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. Im starting a blog soon but have no coding know-how so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

Speak Your Mind