This post contains affiliate links and Corporette® may earn commissions for purchases made through links in this post. For more details see here. Thank you so much for your support!
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Workwear sales of note for 3.24.23:
- Ann Taylor – 40% off everything
- Athleta – 20% off shorts, swim, linen & more
- Banana Republic Factory – 40% off everything; extra 15% off purchase
- Boden – Up to 50% off
- Brooks Brothers – Clearance styles to 70% off. Some pretty serious markdowns!
- Express – 40% off dresses & tops
- J.Crew – 25% off your purchase; up to 50% off special-occasion styles
- J.Crew Factory – Up to 50% off everything; extra 15% off 3 styles; extra 20% off 4 styles; extra 50% off clearance
- Sephora – Up to 50% off select beauty
- Talbots – 25% off select styles; 25% off markdowns
Some of our latest posts here at Corporette…
And some of our latest threadjacks here at Corporette (reader questions and commentary) — see more here!
- What are your favorite parts of a typical day?
- At what point in your life (age, income level, whatever) were you able to take an annual vacation?
- What shoes can I keep at the office to go for mid-day walks (that go with everything)?
- How do you release stress or trauma that’s stored in the body?
- What are the best “networking for women events” you’ve ever been to?
- I feel like we’re burning through any savings we acquire…
- I hate my job and make 30% of what DH makes – should I quit?
- What do you keep in your office?
I wish I could wear this every day.
Agreed. So pretty. And it’s yellow!
Yay! Open thread’s!!!! I love OPEN thread’s. This dress is far to revealing for me tho. Frank would be STAREING at my body since it is so tight fitting. FOOEY on him. He should not stare at my boobies when he has his own wife to stare at!
I like the way this model’s hair is combed. I was happy for the response I got yesterday from Ann on my SCRUNCHIE quandrie and her twistband sugestion, but still would hope the HIVE could way in.
Have others in the hive used the twistband and what do their managing partners say? As a young urban professioneal, I want to be professioneal, but also a little styleish if I can, and mabye the twistband is the way to go. Any advise is much apreciated.
Myrna got a call from Esteban, but I am NOT ready to meet his freind yet, b/c I have to meet Henry with Myrna tomorrow. I am haveing alot of reservation’s about Henry b/c I pulled my HS yearbook out and he WAS on the math team. They were 4 guy’s on the team and all of them were GEEKEY! Henry looked just as strange as the rest of them and I think he was the one who’s underwear they took out of his gym lockerf and hoyisted up the flagpole b/c it had petrified poopie in it. If I ask him about it, I do NOT think he will admit it was his underwear, but now that I think more about it, I am almost sure they took his underwear b/c he had his name in the underwear and there was a reference to it next to his name that said “Petrified Rock up the flagpole.” If I married this guy, everyone at the wedding would know I am married to a guy who hid his soiled underwear in his gym locker until it petrified, then it was hung on the flagpole. DOUBEL FOOEY!
So we will see. If I have to esxcape from him, I will at least have Myrna with me. YAY!!!!!!!
Agreed, love it!
I love this dress. My bank account is happy that I heard the brand runs small, so it wouldn’t come in my size.
So pretty! Wish my work wardrobe would allow for this type of outfit on a regular basis…
Parker - Boardroombelles
……I WANT THAT SO BAD. And that color yellow looks so. flippin. good. on me. Dear universe, why did you not have me born into money.
Have you guys had any luck selling clothing/shoes on eBay? Any advice for an eBay newbie? I have some shoes and dresses that I’ve never worn and I’d like to see if I could get something for them rather than having them collect dust in my closet. Is it worth the time?
I think some of the keys are descriptive titles and listings and good photos of the items.
About 12+ years ago, I remember selling and buying a lot of things on eBay and the message boards there were really great — full of helpful people and tips. Now, that was a long time ago when the internet was relatively novel, so it may not be as helpful now, but its worth checking out.
I’ve sold some stuff-generally kids clothing, not my own. I would say that really hot, popular brands sell best. For example, Dansko clogs in black patent leather will sell, even if used. Frye boots would probably sell quickly. I wouldn’t even bother to try to sell little known brands, even store brands like the Lord & Taylor brand etc. Best way to see if your item will sell is to search it in Ebay, and then look at “completed listings”. If similar items have sold, you are likely to be able to sell yours (and you will get a sense of the price to list your item at). Consignment shops may be a better option.
This. I’ve had great luck on eBay selling Frye boots, Tory Burch shoes, Coach bags, J.crew everything, designer jeans, etc. — even if they were well used. The less known the designer or brand, the less well it seems to sell. For some items, I’ve actually made a profit on them, even after wearing them (old TB Reva flats, I’m looking at you). Take lots of pictures and be thorough and accurate in your descriptions. Include info on whether they run big or small in your opinion. For pants, include the inseam. For purses, include information on size, handle drop, etc. And even better, show the purse in relation to something (like a cell phone or tablet) to give an idea of scale. Set the initial price as low as you would reasonably take. But know if something doesn’t sell the first time, you can re-list it for free.
I’ve sold some stuff. The best way to avoid a hassle is to be completely honest in your description of the merchandise, include lots of pictures, and be clear about the terms of sale (who pays for shipping, whether you will take something back, etc.). The biggest problem with eBay that I’ve found is buyer’s remorse. Also, I think for new clothing, unless it is current season and designer, even if it is new with tags, you should probably expect to take at least 40% off the purchase price.
I am in the process right now of trying to sell some designer items (Manolo Blahnik shoes, a Chloe jacket) that I just don’t wear anymore, and to be honest, I find it all a bit frustrating. Maybe it’s just that there are so many options out there? I’m starting to get a few nibbles, but it’s definitely not the whiz-off-the-shelves opportunity that eBay makes it seem.
Anyway, I’ll keep an eye on this thread in case someone has some magical tips.
OHC, a lot of times my listings didn’t get a lot of activity until the very end of the auction. I think a lot of buyers use bidding software to try and keep prices low. It worked out, some items sold for a much higher price than I expected, but most were <$50 for things that retailed anywhere from $250-500. It definitely didn't help me come close to recouping my costs…just helped me make a little space and gave me back a little cash for stuff I wasn't wearing anymore.
Oh for Pete’s sake, I now see that was a reply to a poster called “OHC” not some mysterious urban dictionary entry that I couldn’t find. Apologies!
Shoot, I heard about a service that you sign up with that caters specifically to designer clothing. I can’t remember the name right now, but I’ll post it if I figure it out. I think the way it works is that you post your item on the site, when it is sold the company sends you prepaid packaging, and the company takes a percentage of the sale like eBay.
Are you thinking of Style [dot] ly ?
I think they’ve changed recently.
On FB, I see sponsored posts for (all one word, no spaces) P O S H M A R K which I think is similar to what Sydney Bristow described above…. g o o g l e it?
There’s a website called TheRealReal dot com that specializes in designer wear if you’re interested in going that route. Full disclosure, I haven’t used it, I know someone who works there so I’m not sure of all the details but it may be worth checking out if you’re not interested in going the eBay route.
I think this is the one I heard about.
I sold some high-end designer items I was no longer using 4 years ago. The tips here are good–take honest pictures of the entire item as well as a few close-ups (like the tags). Don’t be afraid to show off wear and tear. Someone will buy if the price is right–just be honest about wear & tear, worn down areas, etc.
If it’s a nice brand, add anything you can to prove authenticity such as the authenticity cards, original dustcover, box (if you have it), etc. Once again, someone will probably buy it if you don’t have it, but you’ll get a better price if you do. Give a detailed description of the item, including size, color, possibly original price as well. I would often add notes to help guide the sellers like “I normally wear a size 8 but I felt this shoe runs slightly large.” I also made sure to provide a little information about myself (i.e., “I’m not a professional seller, just a girl who loves clothes and is trying to make some more space”). It kept buyers’ expectations realistic since I didn’t have an enormous selling history.
Oh also, one of the big keys is *keywords*! Find other listings of items similar to yours. Look at keywords they have in common. Get in the mindset of an eBay shopper. If you were looking for that item, what would you be searching for? Sure, “brown pumps barely worn” is correct…but “Light Brown Kate Spade Size 9 three inch pumps” is much more descriptive. I also looked through previous successful auctions to find keywords for the item descriptions that would attract buyers. That’s how I figured out to start adding information on the dustbags, authenticity cards and boxes.
Add to that the specific model name and/or number, if applicable. I regularly search for specific Wacoal bras by model number, new with tags, and if I am looking to replace a favorite pair of shoes, I search by the specific name, not just the brand.
I’ve sold a few things. It really depends on the brand, from what I can tell. For example, JCrew and Zara are incredibly popular, and sell very well (even past season, worn items). On the other hand, a dress from a lesser known label will have a hard time garnering attention even if it’s high quality, just because of the sheer number of options available.
Like others have said, it’s worthwhile to search for similar items to see how well they’ve sold. You can set a “reserve price” for an item you’re worried might sell for too little, which is nice for testing the waters. Otherwise, the general advice of be descriptive, take lots of pictures, and communicate quickly applies. Good luck!
Parker - Boardroombelles
Brands sell the best. Handbags and Accessoires (things you don’t have to try on) also fare better than clothes.
Generally, I’d look towards Buffalo Exchange (www.buffaloexchange.com) for clothes if there is a store in your area – for the price you get for these items, 1 hour in line and going through all your clothes at once at Buffalo might give you more value for your time then photographing, listing and answering on Ebay individually.
NEVER sell sets or piles on Ebay – they are guaranteed to get a bad price.
Thanks all, great suggestions in this thread!
frustrated - need advice
…to jump on this, I have a question about using trading assistants on ebay. I would like to do that but I just found out my favorite cousin (who I am very close to) used one last year and this person basically sold all her stuff and never gave her a check for the proceeds. We are talking a few pairs of Danskos -newlike- and quite a few handbags (coach, vera) as well as some tiffany jewelry. ebay does not endorse their trading assistants, even though they list them on their website, and there is apparently little recourse except the criminal justice system? Hilariously enough, this dishonest trading assistant is apparently a (failed) lawyer, so my cousin is thinking about filing a grievance with the state bar after she goes to the police. Any other ideas? Or is small claims court better? There is an email trail where the trading assistant admits to having sold the items and promises to send a check.
So I haven’t sold on eBay but I do buy on there quite often so I can speak to what I look for. I see eBay as the functional equivalent of a final sale from a store that’s gone out of business so I have virtually no recourse if I don’t like what I get. Because of this, I’ll only buy things at a substantial discount – e.g. 20% off of Kate Spade’s Karolina’s won’t get a look from me because I can get that from Zappos w/ a year to return. 50-70% off? I’ll take a flier and buy. I usually search by the item name and brand (see e.g. Kate Spade Karolina). Anything more generic and there’s too much to sift through. I’m usually looking for a good deal on things I know I like and wished I’d bought more of when they were originally in the stores. Hope that helps.
PS – I tend to like “buy it now” as an option too – I dislike waiting around for auctions to end as I don’t have the patience for it.
The Slapdash Sewist
I just sold some boots–auctions ended last night. I’d agree that it’s all about brand names. I sold two pairs of Danskos and one pair of Dan Post cowboy boots. I’ve tried selling lesser brands in the past and for the $5-8 you get, completely not worth the hassle. Definitely search completed listings and see what similar items are going for.
Use the brand name and size in the auction title, fully disclose and photograph any damage (there was a small scratch on one of the boots, I took a closeup photo of it), use up all 12 of your allotted photo slots, and disclose shipping.
Shipping is a perpetual issue. I probably could have gotten my auctions higher if I’d charged less for shipping, but I’ve been burned in the past by underestimating shipping costs and selling some items that ended up affirmatively costing me money. I figured out which size USPS Flat Rate box the items would fit in and charged that for shipping. My auctions ended a bit lower than auctions for the same items, but I’m not going to lose money on shipping so for me it’s worth it.
I ended up getting about half what I paid for each item (well, less than half after you deduct all the eBay and PayPal fees), which is pretty good.
Cute dress, but with my (larger than average) chest, I think it would look like an envelope slowly peeling open.
Good date night dress then?
Ha! Love this
Thanks for causing me to snort hot chocolate all over my table, Herbie.
My work here is done.
Parker - Boardroombelles
That’s a really good point. I agree.
Just wondering if any other black women (or others with similar texture!) have stopped relaxing their hair and gone natural? Or if they’ve tried methods other than relaxing to manage their hair (keratin? japanese straightening?)? Do any of you have extensions? Any product recommendations for relaxed hair?
I’ve been struggling with my hair recently, I feel like I’m in a rut, and I don’t know what to do. I want smoother, thicker, longer hair that’s easier to manage. Going natural is only in there because I’m sick of so many chemicals, I don’t know if I could take the plunge.
I have been wondering the same thing re: natural hair.Would be considered professional in an office setting? I think the women I see with natural hair look beautiful, but I don’t encounter many women of color in my profession with natural hair. I currently have short relaxed hair, but have considered going natural to avoid some of the chemicals and see if I can let it grow longer. Currently my hair is pretty healthy. I use a lot of Jane Carter products in between trips to see my stylist and they are wonderful (and natural).
Do you know anyone who has pulled off natural hair in an office setting?
No, I actually don’t know anyone at all with natural black hair, though my city (and friend group) isn’t exactly diverse.
I currently work in house at a tech company and have previously summered at a law firm and an insurance company. Never had any problems with my hair and have only had positive attention. I had a twa and mid-length fro when I summered and shoulder-plus length hair at my current job, which I usually wear in buns or braidouts (similar to this http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_WZz5AIT2Vmc/TLCb499Ym1I/AAAAAAAAADU/Ghuli0D2CP0/s1600/braidout.jpg). Most of my friends from college have subsequently gone natural and work in a variety of fields (legal, healthcare, education administration, consulting) with no problem.
Ooh I love the braidout hair! I wish my super fine hair could do that.
I wish I had the patience to do that! My hair is that length, but I’d braid or twist and then be done……
I only do 6-8 braids, so it really doesn’t take that long.
Hmmm. I mostly do Curly girl method (totally lazy with my hair) but I found a picture with KCCC, so I may try that tomorrow – I am a bit of a product junkie so I have all sorts of stuff for when the rare mood strikes…. Maybe I’ll try that next. Do you use any particular product with your braid out?
The products I use vary, but it’s generally some type of hair lotion or milk to moisturize and some type of coconut oil (summer) or shea butter (winter) to seal. I only use gel in the summer to combat humidity (ouidad climate control is excellent). Shea Moisture products are a great place to start since they’re cheap, good ingredients, and available everywhere.
Thanks. Maybe I’ll try soon….
I went natural in 2008, while I was in law school, after relaxing for close to 15 years. I highly recommend it! My hair is longer, thicker and healthier than it’s ever been. There are so many options out there right now in terms of products, advice, salons, etc. Some of my favorite blogs are afrobella, bglh, curlynikki, newly natural, and the natural haven. I rarely straighten my hair (1-2 times/year), but I have natural friends who straighten more often or only straighten and they agree that their hair is so much healthier. I don’t have an incognito email address, but if you leave your email here I can send you a message if you have more questions.
Black with natural hair here. I work for a financial services (insurance) firm headquartered in Boston, which is very conservative and I’ve never had any problems. My hair has been natural for going on 14 years, so even when I lived in New Hampshire (I’m now in Kansas City) and I never had any problems. Either I cut it short and wear a TWA or let it grow out and keep it pulled back into a low bun to protect the ends.
Occasionally during the summer I’ll let it loose on jean Fridays, but frankly, that’s such a hassle and it tends to knot up, so I limit having it loose and down.
I’ve never received any negative feedback (well, I actually have, but it has come from other black women giving me the side eye) and it looks professional at all times.
I think weaves can look very un-professional if exceedingly long and of poor quality, so I’d prefer to see more women rocking their natural hair (and saving their edges).
Yaaaassss, a prayer for the edges….lol!
Laughing at black women giving you the side eye–I get all kinds of comments from black women, especially older black women about my son’s (I’m white, his dad is African) curly hair.
To the OP–I think lots of white people have no clue about all the relaxers and chemicals involved in straightening curly hair or how much time it can take to style it to be straight or in braids. As long as you keep it well groomed, I don’t think they’re going to care if you wear yours curly or straight. But if you’re worried about reactions, you could mention the time and chemicals a couple times–just don’t turn into your office curly girl poster child. As for why black women hold each other to this standard and what you should say to them, I have no idea.
A woman in my office went natural. After a somewhat awkward transition period, it looks professional and gorgeous.
Giraffe with curls
I am not Black, so apologies if this is unwelcome, but I thought it might help – there is a woman in my office with short natural hair, and it is beautiful. I think she looks absolutely professional. I feel like I am seeing more and more women with natural hair, although most seem to keep it fairly short. I am in Biglaw on the West Coast.
A woman in my office has natural hair, and she always looks amazing, head to toe; totally professional.
totally agree: I am White and have nothing but respect and love for Black women rocking natural hair. I think it’s beautiful.
Natural since 2009. Best decision I’ve ever made w/r/t hair. Once you get past thinking smooth/straight = beautiful, or even professional, its fine. I slowly transitioned, cutting my below shoulder length into a bob, and then a bit more, and finally big chopped when I had about 2 inches of hair. Now, if I blow dry, its well past where I started, but really I love the freedom, I love my curls, and I really can’t imagine ever straightening again, at least not permanently. I’ve worn it blown straight once, and couldn’t wait to put some water back in and get my curls back. I work in corporate America and have been promoted twice. Oh, and I have big hair. I tend to wash & go, as I don’t have the patience for twist outs and the like…. I am contemplating cutting,, but not twa short – just something a little shorter.
this is both the beauty and the danger of going natural, having itchy fingers. I big chop about every 2 years because I see someone’s beautiful twa and run in and cut mine and then grow it out for two years so i can do a twist out or something and then start all over again.
Like Diva, I love my curls and so does my husband. I asked not long ago if I should straighten and you’d think I’d threatened to grow a beard, he was horrified, even though he teases me about my big hair when I do a wash and go.
After ten years of relaxing, I went natural in college. I think I relaxed for a year or so a few years after graduating from law school, but otherwise have been natural the last fifteen years. The professionalism of it depends on how you wear it — I wouldn’t go for a haphazard asymmetrical blowout for court, but twa, or wearing it up, or braid outs, or dreds … as long as your hair is neat and groomed, you will be fine. And lord knows it is better than some of these ragged weaves women seem to think they can get away with because the hair is long and straight.
The biggest issue, I think, in the workplace will be a desire of your (white) co-workers to discuss your hair with you. God forbid you switch things up every now and again, there will be comments and discussions about how your hair managed to do whatever, how random co-workers wished their hair could [stand up like that, lay down like that, look that cute curly], how someone wants to touch your hair, and it will get tiresome. At this point, I just smile, don’t engage in conversation, and move on. My hair is barely that interesting to me, so I certainly don’t want to talk about it when I should be writing a brief.
You do know that happens to most people when they change their hair up, right?
I don’t know, maybe it feels like it’s something more pointed to you, but I think that might just be because you’ve never been in any position but your own (understandably), but I change my hair with some frequency, and I get those kind of comments as well. And people have wanted to touch it. And say they wish their hair would do X. And I’m white. And they were white. Maybe white people are just nosier about hair in general?
I have heard this complaint/discussion a number of times, and the white women are always confused about why this is a problem, and I think it’s because you think they are just doing it to YOU, and they aren’t. They do it to everyone.
The difference between your experience and mine (as well as many other black women) is that you admit that you change your hair often, whereas I don’t. I have about 3 standard hairstyles, in addition to straightening it once a year. And yet every time I change it, I get comments and my boss has even said “You have so many hairstyles.” Except that I don’t. And whole the attention has always been positive, it is also somewhat othering. For many people, lots of hairstyles that they can’t do or that would look different on their hair is the same as lots of styles.
I think you misunderstood my saying I change it frequently. I don’t mean I come to work with blonde hair one day and brown two weeks later, or long then short then long.
I mean, Sometimes I wear it in a ponytail. It’s naturally curly so sometimes I wear it curly. Sometimes I flat iron it straight.
I get comments all the time, even when I wore it curly 2 weeks ago, if I wear it curly tomorrow, someone will say something about it. I can wear it curly one day and straight another time, and they can’t without a perm. They comment on that.
But I can see that you don’t want to accept that it is even possible people aren’t ‘othering’ you, that that feeling is something you’re creating within yourself, so I will quit trying to say anything otherwise.
I am African (from Morocco) and one day – maybe 2 years ago – with much support from the hive, I decided to go natural. I did it slowly, transitioning off the relaxer.
Great decision as my hair texture is bouncy and so curly, I didn’t even know my hair had a curl pattern!
But you have to be ready because it is not all rosy, there are bad hair days where all you can do is pop your head under the shower and put gel to control the craziness.
You can have natural hair and still look very professional, it is all about looking polished.
This seems like a cruel joke post-breakup but somehow all the ads on this site (and on other sites) for me are for engagement rings and wedding dresses…
It is based on your history. You should clear your cache and cookies. Also, sorry, that sucks!
Clear the cookies in your browser. That should help.
Clear the cache, that would help.
I was in a long distance relationship. After the breakup, I kept getting airline tickets deal ads to my ex-bf’s city ! It was so annoying at that time.
It seems my history at some sites do it. Brilliant Earth e-rings showed up a lot because I was crushing on a vintage ring there.
Then I went to Overstock and looked at some cat condos and cat trees. Now I have lots of kitties in my ads. Much better.
I am a banana.
I went through a breakup over a year ago and as soon as I switched my FB status, my ads went from engagement rings to dating sites. Too soon, Pandora!
Wait till you get the match.com one over and over. That’s the WORST.
Do you ever feel like you need to stop and think about all the reasons you have to be grateful? I’m finishing up a brutal week and I stopped for a second and thought of many reasons my life is great, even when I have weeks that completely kick my @$$.
So, participate if you’d like, but here are my happy thoughts:
I have a job I truly love
We can afford health insurance so when DH gets sick, it’s not a huge burden
I have a wonderful support system both near and far
There is coffee in the world
Oh, honey, you said it! Your post couldn’t have come at a better time for me. I haven’t worn my “grateful” necklace in awhile and I need to remind myself.
I have a job that I love and great colleagues and I’m impressed with them every day
I make enough to be able to treat myself with things that make me feel better
I am strong and healthy
I have a wonderful community of people whom I love and who love me
There is chocolate in the world
Shoot! KC made me realize that I didn’t mention that I have a sweet SO who loves me. He was supposed to come today then had to cancel because his car was still in the shop but he was so sweet and attentive, knowing that I was tired and stressed and disappointed. Tomorrow, I hope!
I just realized I forgot DH too!
Damn, this is like Oscar acceptance speeches. There are too many people to thank!
Thank you for this reminder :)
To chime in:
I have a job that is interesting and challenges me daily.
I am healthy and general happy.
I have a thoughful boyfriend who makes me smile.
There are baked goods in the world.
I have a family that I love, genuinely like, and can count on no matter what.
I have friends who help me to be a better, more thoughtful person.
I have a job that I enjoy and coworkers who are nice and interesting.
I have an apartment that suits me and is all mine!
I have triple chocolate chip cookies!
I have an amazing DH who does whatever he can to make me happy
I have friends and family that love and care for me
By “luck of the draw” I had another Dr. (rather than MY doctor) operate for my interstitial ectopic- who saved my life, both ovaries, and kept me from having a hysterectomy
Lastly, I don’t want to punch my Managing Partner in the face…today
I have a great family–hubby, 3 kids, plus parents and sibs who are pretty great.
I have a (lawyer) job I love and do work I honestly believe in.
I have enough money to pay the mortgage, student loans, and buy fresh, healthy food for our family–and enough money left over after paying everything to take the kids out to the movies tonight. Yay!–also thankful for a dollar movie near our house :)
I also have a great family – 3 awesome kids and a wonderfully supportive dh
I have a job I really enjoy and pays all our bills, and then some, so dh doesn’t have to work
I’m healthy, and the rest of my family is too
We live in a beautiful part of the world and get to enjoy the mountains almost whenever we want
– job I love and believe in
– enough money to pay my bills
– great boyfriend who cooks dinner
– awesome roommate who pays bills on time, is never obnoxious about being messy or having weird guests, and is good company
– amazing family
– cutest dog ever
This is very timely because I’m stressed after being home all day due to the snow with my toddler while my husband was out running around to meetings, etc. I don’t know how stay at home moms do it every day! But I am grateful for my happy, healthy, rambunctious child and a husband who works very hard every day to achieve his dreams and provide for our family. I am also thankful for a flexible job that allows me to work from home at times like this. Even if the only time I can get anything done is nap time and after bed time…
I love it when people post things like this :) I love reading the responses. For me, I’m grateful for: having the chance to live in Spain; having great, supportive friends and family, both here and back home; having my parents be in reasonably good health; not having student loans; my amazingly wonderful dog; running; and getting home two seconds before it started raining.
We’ve had my elderly father-in-law on our hands a bit more than usual this month as a result of a blip in his domestic arrangements. It’s been a little black cloud on my horizon but now that it’s coming to an end, I’m so grateful that (1) I’ve been able to sustain a cheerful face (2) my hubby is hugely appreciative of the back-up he’s getting and keeps telling me so (3) we are in a position to throw money at the situation to ensure this blip is just a short one (4) I have great siblings who share the responsibility with me for our own parents.
Long time lurker and first time commenter! I am taking the bar exam for the first time on Tuesday and Wednesday and I am starting to feel panicky. Any last minute words of wisdom? (Other than, “get off the internet and get back to practicing MBEs and essays, slacker.”) Thanks in advance!
My advice is the opposite of what you said. Take a little time for yourself every day where you don’t have to think about MBEs and essays. Especially the day before the exam. I know it sounds completely crazy, but all the work is done by the day before. You are probably not going to cram an appreciable amount of info into your brain by that point. I studied for about 2 hours that morning (after sleeping in) and took the rest of the day completely off. Best decision I made during bar prep.
The weekend before, I realized that I wasn’t going to have time to write as many essays as I wanted, and I had the writing form down (CRAC), so I just read sample answers. In a coffee shop while enjoying sunshine and delicious treats.
Agree with AnonInfinity re: studying. Here’s what I would do: Plan out your bar exam. Figure out all the logistics, visit where you’ll be staying if you can, figure out how early you’ll need to leave each morning, perhaps pack some healthy snacks for lunch during the bar exam, get some sleep. Having all of this under control will let you just focus on the bar exam. Also, I found that I was very nervous and had no appetite, but protein smoothies were tolerable and kept me full, so I packed a cooler with those and kept in my car.
And a prescription for Ambien or Lunesta. A half pill of Ambien each night for the week before the CA bar left me much better rested than some of my friends who could hardly sleep from stress. Note that you should drink a full glass of water with the pill and another full glass or two when you get up. And no, you won’t get addicted from only a week of use.
Agreed with the others that the key thing now is mental sanity. You know what you know, and it’s enough to pass. The last few days of cramming are just going to stress you out. Go to the gym, go to yoga, go for a walk outside. You can much better access all that information you know when your mind is calm and your body is rested and fed.
I would say don’t take the Lunesta or Ambien for the first time before the bar if you’ve never taken it before. I had a friend who took half an Ambien for the first time the night before the first day, and it did not go well. She had a horrible time waking up and barely made it to the exam and she was groggy for the beginning of it. The stress the whole experience caused was worse than just not sleeping well the night before.
Yes, I 100% agree that a person should not take an Ambien for the first time the night before the bar exam. I find that drinking a ton of water helps tremendously with the groggy.
Phew. I have to say when my friend did this, I was like, “Wait. Wait. Wait. You did what? Why would you take that for the first time ever in that circumstance?!?!?!”
But she passed!
Def would not go with ambien. But I did take a tylenol pm before. I was also staying at my parents house too though, so I had a backup human alarm too.
Yes, this exactly. Take time to relax, to recharge and do something else without thinking about the bar. (And definitely don’t study or practice just before bed — I still remember from when I took the bar 23 years ago (eek!) waking up in the middle of the night and finding that I’d been dreaming multi-state questions.)
I also found that it helped me to remember that I didn’t need to get an A or be in the top whatever percentage (there is no summa cum laude result for the bar exam but I only had to pass.
You will be FINE, really.
Totally agree. I reviewed flash cards for 1 hour the morning before, then took the rest of the day off, went to see a movie, checked into a hotel near the testing site, had a nice dinner, watched a bunch of cable TV at the hotel, and went to bed as early as I knew I had a chance of falling asleep.
Also, test run the route you are taking to get to the test site, get there a little earlier than you think you should, pack your clear plastic bag and lay out your clothes the night before, and eat a good breakfast both mornings. Good luck!
And another +1 on relaxing.
I took the California Bar last summer, and key for me were:
1. Not studying the night(s) in between days of testing. Not expecting to study. Honestly, I stayed with my family, watched trashy TV, ate comfort food, and had a glass of wine each night. And I passed.
2. Figure out what you are doing for lunch–some way to distract yourself. We had incredibly long lunch breaks. I was able to meet up with my Mom, go chat, she took me out to lunch so I didn’t have to think about it. But if I were you, I’d find a nice sit down restaurant within walking distance of the exam if possible (or have a lunch prepared in your hotel room or whatever), set a timer, and sit down and distract yourself with a TV show or two, a magazine, whatever. Just don’t think about the bar.
Good luck! You WILL be fine, although I know that is really obnoxious to hear.
It’s really not as bad as you expect. I didn’t crack a bar review book until two weeks before the exam and never studied for more than 4-5 hours a day until the last couple days of cramming (I hope this doesn’t sound like a humblebrag–I was really just a very bad procrastinator!). I left the exam feeling broadsided by questions on subjects I wasn’t prepared for, and still managed to scrape out a pass. Try to get some solid nights of sleep over the next few days and you will be fine!
I stopped studying the day before the exam, and the evening before, I took a nice bath, played jazz music and just relaxed. I slept like a baby awoke ready to do battle!
+1 on relaxing. Also, if you’re lucky enough to do MBE first then state, ignore the state exceptions for now and focus on just the answers for MBE. The night between the exam days, run through the state exceptions quickly. My study partner proposed we do this and I thought he was crazy at the time, but it really helped me not get confused on exam day.
Thanks, all. I vacillate between: (i) feeling like I’m prepared and I should just do a reasonable amount of review while taking care of myself over the next few days; and (ii) thinking ohmygod what if I get an essay on this one issue that I don’t quite grasp every tiny nuance of I’d better memorize more! Or THAT issue! ALL THE ISSUES. It’s hard to stay big picture as I get more nervous, but this feedback is helping. Thanks again.
Well, if you get an essay on an issue you don’t know anything about, take comfort in the fact that you can make up a rule that seems reasonable and apply that. You will still get points. Everyone I know did this.
If you think you’re prepared even some of the time, you are prepared. Go for a walk and just refresh yourself a few hours a day.
AND GOOD LUCk!!!!
Yep, I did that – made up a rule and applied it for one of the essays.
Me too. I passed last year in a jurisdiction that tested UCC Article 7 and short-form corporate mergers, and lord knows I didn’t know a lick about the two subjects come test day. Accept that you won’t know everything on the test, and stay calm. As long as you write something, you will get some credit.
FWIW, I “made up” a rule on a crim law question that actually was a real rule (for a much worse crime), and therefore completely wrong, and wrote the essay accordingly. I passed with a really decent score. You’ll be fine :)
Also, I have done something close to fifty practice essays at this point (yes, really – because I didn’t go to actual classes, as I’m working), and I can tell you that about 30% of the time, there’s an essay on something Bar/Bri just didn’t teach you. The good thing? No one else will know it either. Keep reminding yourself of that!
You will get one (or two) like that. I did on both bar exams I took. I did what the other commenters have stated and made up a law. I passed both bar exams just fine :)
You have to convince yourself you will do great. Don’t think about what you could have done and didn’t. Think about how this is (probably) the most you have ever studied for anything.
Day of test, use the adrenaline to own it and don’t let it go the wrong way and psych yourself out.
As far as tests go, there were WAY more challenging tests in law school. And you did that.
What helped me is keeping in mind that I didn’t need an A, just a C. Also, if you don’t know something, make it up. I took several states, didn’t even study for one, and just said, “in NJ, ….” – and I passed!
Oh, and take a break the day before. You know what you know at that point. Good luck!
I lateraled and I’m taking my new state’s exam Tuesday. At this point, I figure the ship has sailed. I’m outlining a few essays and reading model answers, but I’m mostly trying to make sure I’m in my best physical shape (rested, well-fed, etc.) for the exam.
Good luck, cbackson! I know you’ll pass New State’s bar with flying colors!
Thank you! I alternate between feeling ill with anxiety and feeling like it’s going to be no big deal. Hopefully the latter is the case.
+a million on relaxing. The only studying I did in the days leading up to the exam were to review my flash cards a few times. The day before I went to the mall and had an early night. After the first day I had a massage, then dinner, then an early night. I did NOT talk about the bar at all, which did wonders for my sanity.
Good luck! Is your exam at a hotel? Mine was and I ordered room service lunch each day. It was nice to get back to my room and decompress. I also had dinner with friends from law school after the first day and we had a beer with dinner, which everyone was shocked at but helped me relax and get to sleep that night.
Ditto to what everyone is saying about relaxing at this point and doing what you can to prepare for the morning of, like figuring out what you will eat lunch, what you will wear, and, if you are staying in a hotel, what to pack. I would also recommend going to the testing site the day before. I’m in FL and they allowed us to view the room (set-up already) the day before. You couldn’t go in, but something about taking as much of the “surprise” out of what to expect helps with the stress tremendously. FL also has a powerpoint on the Bar site (which you really have to search for) that gives photos and tells you what to expect- like the metal detectors, what you can bring in with you, etc.
Lastly, bring a fleece jacket. I was cold, then hot, and then used it to put under my elbows which got sore from leaning on the splintery table. Good luck and try to relax!
The weekend before my bar exam, my DH and I went away for the weekend and spent it with and friends at a house on a lake (summer bar). Best decision ever. Relax, sleep, and good luck!
Remember that the bar exam, as I was once told, is really an exercise in malpractice. If you ever tried to practice multiple areas of law, from memory, you would soon be in trouble. So don’t think of it as a competence test, but an endurance test.
So if you keep that in mind, and you know the material, just relax, and you’ll be fine.
Do whatever you did during law school to get you through final exams. Now is not the time to start trying out new study/focus/relaxation techniques. Whatever you did then got you this far, so keep it up (unless that was totally procrastinating til the last minute!). Try to relax, breathe, and remind yourself that your self worth and future are NOT reliant on this test. You can do it.
Anon For This
For clerks and others in similar positions – I am working for a year in a high profile clerkship. Since I’m new to the area, I’ve been trying to network and meet other people around my age. There have been a number of times when someone finds out where I clerk and they say “Oh I applied for that last year and didn’t get it”, or just “Oh… I applied for that too”. Awkward silence usually follows. What would you say in my place?
Anon For This
To clarify – when it’s someone more experienced saying something nice “Wow, that’s amazing” I usually say thank you, or I’m happy to be here and move on, like we discussed a couple of days ago. It’s only when my peers let me know that they applied for that position also that it gets awkward
This seems odd. Are you only meeting lawyers? I don’t think you have to say anything beyond “oh”.
“Yeah, I feel really lucky to have gotten it since it’s so competitive” maybe?
I would probably nod and say something like, “Ahhhh… Well, I’m glad to be in this city now. I ate at X the other day and thought it was great. Have you been there? What’s your favorite place to grab coffee?” In other words, change the subject to something neutral.
In these situations I try to assume the person just said it without really thinking and the person feels awkward for saying it. Not that everyone feels that way, just that it’s more charitable than thinking that the person is intentionally trying to make me feel awkward or weird about my job.
I would say, “so what are you doing?” or “tell me about what you do.” Ask questions— people like to talk about themselves. If these folks were viable candidates to be scotus (or wherever) clerks, then they’re probably not working the drive-through somewhere— there’s no need to walk on eggshells for them.
This. OP, it sounds like maybe you are the one making it awkward. Don’t feel sorry for them. If they’re willing to talk openly about being interested in the job you landed, they probably are not feeling awkward. You are— it sounds like you feel sheepish about being chosen, but be careful not to come off as condescending.
For every “high profile” clerkship, there are 100 qualified candidates. You getting it doesn’t mean you’re necessarily better than these other people; you just had the right package at the right time. That’s something most mature folks can handle without feeling awkward.
Anon For This
OP here – I 100% agree with what you said about there being many more qualified candidates for each position (and many way more qualified than me). Now that I have seen how the selection process is on the other side, I can honestly say that me being here is a lot of luck (yes, hard work, blah blah blah), but also just luck. Of course, I don’t want to say that to others, but it’s true.
You sound very sweet, OP. (sincerely.)
So you’ve posted about your “prestigious” (last time) and “high profile” (this time) clerkship twice. If you’re at the Supreme Court… be careful. It really won’t be hard to figure out who you are. (Not that you’ve said anything scandalous, but it’s clear you want to be “Anon.”
Anon For This
This is the first time I posted about this. Whoever posted earlier this week is in a different position, and I only referenced her post to clarify that I was asking about something slightly different. Thanks for the concern though.
Honestly, if your not at the supreme court, enough with the “prestigious” “high profile” clerking posts. For both today and the other post, just say thanks or change the subject. I feel like both OPs are the ones making it akward
Alanna of Trebond
If you’re a SCOTUS clerk, how did you get it? I am clerking for a semi-feeder judge next year, and am interested in applying.
Wearing jeans and running shoes today to work feels so weird – even though i’m the only one here in the office and i’m packing my desk to move to a new office.
The post from this morning got me thinking, because I am pretty sure I have a crush on one of my managers. I would never do anything about it, since he’s my manager and he has a girlfriend. But I definitely find that I am a little more excited to come in to work because of him. We don’t flirt or act inappropriately and I have no reason to think he feels the same about me, but due to some reshuffling of work I am working with him on almost everything I do now, so I do spend a lot of time with him every day. Should I just wait this crush out? I feel a little ridiculous, like I’m back in high school again. Any advice? I certainly don’t think I can ask anyone I know in real life!
Parker - Boardroombelles
My advice is to be extremely careful. Make sure you don’t put yourself in a situation that could be viewed as inappropriate. Ask yourself: Does this behavior open me up to gossip? Does this behavior intensify rather than help me get rid of my crush? Just a few examples,: working on the same project and then getting ALL your meals together, working late nights together and getting drinks afterwards, sharing and repeating lots of inside jokes.
As for what to do with your feelings while you are being careful: try to convert them into positive energy for the things you are working on (you already seem to be doing that, so that’s great) and maybe it gives you the energy to pick up a new hobby outside of work (where you meet someone safe to have a crush on).
Wait it out, and try not to dwell on your feelings. During my 18+ years of marriage I’ve had a handful of inappropriate crushes. I tried to ignore the feelings, and eventually they went away.
Parker - Boardroombelles
Try to sympathize with and respect the guy’s girlfriend here. If you were dating someone, how would you want your boyfriend’s attractive coworker to act around him? That should guide you. Definitely avoid spending any excess time with your manager until your crush blows over.
All Fridays should be halfdays. I’m so ready to be done for the week.
This would be magical. Seriously. I’ve contemplated taking off half days on Fridays to show that I can still get all my stuff done (face time is big here even if you’re playing on the internet).
There’s a major company in my city that has every other Friday off. I’m jealous pretty much constantly.
General Mills does this in summer, I believe. It’s so amazing!
So half day Fridays in the summer used to be a thing. It still should be.
I’ve gone from working 65-70ish hours a week to 40 this week and for the foreseeable future, so luckily I feel like today was a half day since I’m leaving in 30 minutes. Too bad that feeling won’t last LNG, but I’m excited to have time for myself again!
Our staff gets 4 half Fridays in the summer of their own choosing. I am always so jealous.
Hi Hive, I live in the east coast and would like to send some relatives in seattle some Maine lobsters. My original plan was to buy them and ship them over but I found out the shipping cost was ridiculous. So does anyone know any seafood market in the Seattle area that would deliver fresh Maine lobsters? I think delivery fees would.be more reasonable. Thanks!
Have you tried lobstergram DOT com?
F in SF
FoodyDirect is a gourmet food website which partners with local restaurants/food suppliers. They’ve got great customer service (have ordered cakes from them): https://www.foodydirect.com/restaurants/hancock-gourmet-lobster/dishes
Has anyone given up traditional flour (white/wheat) and seen any benefits? I read articles that say the way these products are grown now is insanely different and has all sorts of negative health effects. The research skeptic in me says Dr. Oz (and company) is full of it, but I’m also hearing more success stories. The thought of giving up baked goods makes me want to weep, but if it makes you feel massively better or has some other amazing effects I would honestly be open.
What say the Hive?
I did the Paleo diet for a month or so and I felt so much better (that also involved giving up sugar and dairy, so it may not have been just the wheat). I had more energy, my headaches went away, and so did all of my stomach problems. The cynical part of me says that Paleo is just another fad diet, but I honestly felt so much better on it (and also lost several pounds). I fell off the wagon after a month or so of doing it, but I’m trying to get started again.
So…I would give it a shot for a couple weeks (it took me a few days to start feeling better). Worst case is that you crave cookies for a week.
Thanks! I’ve been thinking of doing paelo, but think I’d probably have to ease into it. Plus all the meat kind of freaks me out.
It was actually easier than I thought it would be (although I wasn’t 100% hardcore about it). I just tried to eat a ton of fresh fruits and veggies and then meat at least once a day for protein. I don’t eat pork and I’m not a huge red meat person, so I ended up eating a ton of chicken breasts (which I know are boring, but I love) and some fish. Also a lot of eggs. Granted, I only did it for a month or so, so I can’t promise that it’s sustainable for the rest of your life, but that month was honestly not as hard as you would think.
Do it! I did it for 6 months & with no exercise lost 25 lbs & went down 2 pants sizes. I need to get back to it.
It might be because Paleo diets are low-GI (glycemic index) and you don’t have all the blood sugar spikes you’d get from eating high-GI carbs. I have to eat like that because I’m hypoglycemic, but I’ve heard that a lot of people feel better when their blood sugar is well-managed. Less headaches, less acne, easier to lose weight (for people with PCOS, but I think it might help all people who are apple-shaped).
I don’t know. I haven’t given them up completely, but generally, I can say that I feel better when I don’t eat crackers, white bread and pasta, baked goods, etc. As I’ve gotten older, I’ve really started to pay attention to how I feel when I eat certain foods and have generally tried to avoid them. This is not to say that I won’t eat a delicious piece of cake or cookie from time to time, but I notice that I don’t feel great after I do. Being mindful of this feeling has allowed me to make better decisions as to whether the “splurge” is worth it. Some things are simply not worth feeling blah and some things are!
I try to think ahead to the future (20 minutes into the future) and decide whether I want to eat whatever it is. I think this is easier than an across the board “I’m never going to have X ever, ever, ever again.”
To be clear, the only health effects I’ve seen from this willy nilly policy are feeling better. I’m generally thin and have decent skin, so there’s been no huge improvement in those areas. Although, I am prone to gaining weight and I maintain my weight pretty easily just by generally avoiding things that make me feel gross.
Thanks MB. I think I’ve been overindulging a lot lately, so I don’t have a good handle on what foods make me feel blah. Mindful of the effects of certain foods is exactly what I’m looking for!
Yes, this. I’ve also been trying to be a lot more conscious about how I feel after I eat something and that’s how I started realizing that I feel a little icky after I eat a lot of grains. It’s not a big horrible sickness, but I just feel headachey and blah. Totally worth it once in a while for a slice of birthday cake or something, but it helps me talk myself out of it when it’s just like “Do I really want this muffin for breakfast instead of having a nice piece of fruit?”
Try it but don’t force yourself to stick with it. I tried it, got horrible headaches and went up two dress sizes in two months.
That said, it works for some people. Just be ready for night sweats and drink plenty of water–ketosis is really hard on kidneys.
I just don’t see how you could go up two dress sizes in two months unless you were eating so much more food than you were before. You must have gone off the rails eating steak and chicken to gain that much in that short amount of time.
This is not a productive comment. Everyone is different.
How is it not productive? That experience of gaining 2 dress sizes in 2 months cannot be related solely to the Paleo diet or cutting out flour. Everyone might be different, but unless she’s an alien, basic metabolic science would suggest that it was not cutting out flour that made her gain that amount of weight in that time frame.
Complicated metabolic science could explain it, tho.
If I recall k-padi has said that she also went on paleo while doing crossfit. So it could be a combination of muscle gain and a diet that made her gain other weight too.
Thanks for backing me up everyone!
I was doing crossfit 5-6x/week, running 5k-10k on weekends, and I started trying to go Paleo. I was eating breakfast for the first time, eating a lot of meat (against everything I know about my body), and adding a lot more fat (albeit “healthy” fats ala olive oil, avocado, eggs, etc).
The headaches were the kicker for me–the only way to continue working was to have a mid-afternoon cookie. It was bad choice, yes, but it’s what was available but I don’t think that was most significant reason I gained weight because a 200 calorie cookie 3 times per week when working out like I was shouldn’t make a huge difference.
I think the kicker was that I was in a relationship at the time with another Paleo Crossfitter so my portion sizes were based on what men should eat, not women. My “cheat meals” were guy-meals which are so much bigger and fattier than my normal cheats. Plus, without the insulin response, I never felt full and would just keep eating.
Cookies. The truth comes out.
We do all have different metabolisms–it’s not like we’re cars with one type of engine that always runs a certain way or can be hooked up to a diagnostic computer to find out what’s wrong (though that would be nice! *sigh*) K-Padi sounds like her body really reacts to whatever changes she makes–gains weight fast, loses it fast, gets bored & goes into stasis fast. No need to accuse her of lying because if this.
I know a ton of people who have cut out gluten/wheat. All have felt better and lost weight (nothing dramatic but most about 10lbs, up to about 20) Out of about 30 people I have never heard of people not feeling good, so I think it works for the majority of people. (Most did not do it 100% wheat free, but around 80-95%)
Regarding ketosis being hard on your kidneys:
I just wanted to point out to the original poster that going gluten-free, paleo, and/or eating ketogenic (where you put your body in ketosis) are three rather different things. Your question asked about cutting out wheat, which would be similar to a gluten free diet. If you have a sensitivity to gluten, you might start feeling a lot better (less inflammation, better digestion) on a gluten-free diet. However, gluten free does not mean low-carb, paleo, or ketogenic. You can eat gluten-free and get plenty of carbs from potatoes, corn, cornbread, corn chips, sweet potatoes, rice, beans, fruits, other starchy vegetables like cauliflower, carrots, etc.
Paleo diets are gluten-free because they cut out wheat, but they also cut out other things- often grains like corn, oatmeal, and other foods like nuts, beans, and dairy. However, Paleo is not necessarily low carb either. You can eat paleo and be high carb with potatoes, fruits, etc.
Finally, ketogenic often means gluten-free in practice because you have to eat such high amounts of fat to keep your body in ketosis that you don’t have room for many carbs, so you don’t eat things like wheat. But gluten-free does not equal ketogenic.
I just want to point out that you can fairly easily cut out gluten by itself and still enjoy foods like corn tortillas, mashed potatoes, rice and beans, even baked goods made with tapioca, rice, or almond flour, and that kind of diet would allow you to assess the benefits of a gluten free diet but would never put you into ketosis.
This. Thank you for posting this. So many people get confused about the differences between these methods of eating.
From giving up just wheat that happened??
I have given up most products with wheat in them and feel a lot better. My stomach issues have gotten better and I have lost weight. The other night I decided to “cheat” and had some delicious french bread–and paid for it later. I have found I can have a little bit and still feel ok, but when I eat too much wheat it is not good.
Going low carb for us helped immensely with weight loss.
We’re not totally no flour, but it’s certainly very rare. We switched from flour tortillas to corn, don’t do muffins/pancakes/biscuits anymore, try not to eat places with complimentary rolls, etc.
Not being snarky, I swear,but isn’t the weight loss just due to less calories being consumed? If you don’t have dinner rolls you had about 200 fewer calories, right? I honestly don’t get the low carb thing. It seems like people are cutting out high calorie things like pancakes and attributing the weight loss to cutting out carbs.
Less calories than what you need does equal weight loss. But there has been research over the years that not all calories are created equal. Much as we’d like to believe that the 100 calories from the fun size twix or whatever make the same difference as the 100 calories from an apple, some argue they do not.
I realize not everyone believes this, so plenty of room to disagree on this one
The other thing that could be happening is that people could be substituting the (less filling) carbs like bread, with more filling, more protein packed foods. So you feel like you are consuming the same amount of food (after all you are not going hungry), but really it’s food with less calories that keeps you just as fool
Or you know, just as FULL
This was a medical thing, so the low carb was actually important.
And, we were big pasta eaters. We could eat vegetarian several days a week just based on us having pasta with no meat, but we weren’t necessarily eating a lot of vegetables (I don’t think red sauce or pesto sauce actually counts as having much of a vegetable).
You’re right, there were lots of things we probably weren’t doing right. The two of us lost 100 pounds (combined) in about 6 months, without a significant increase in exercise, so there was obviously room for improvement.
We’re not radical low carb. We eat some fruit, brown rice, and cereal. We use smaller plates. We’re more careful about what we eat when we snack.
But the thing that got us doing all that was thinking about low carb choices.
My husband felt much better and was noticeably thinner after just a week or so – I think he’d been puffy due to a potential wheat allergy. He has other food allergies and sensitivities.
I noticed absolutely nothing. I have no other food issues, allergies, intolerances. I didn’t notice anything when I started eating wheat again, either.
Parker - Boardroombelles
After watching all these great food documentaries (Food Inc, Fat, Sick and Nearly Dying, Forks over Knives) over the last years, I drastically changed the way I eat. And by drastic, I mean I changed drastically from my prior behavior but I’m not following any one really drastic diet.
Reading up on several different diets, I came up with my own happy medium:
– Try to avoid meat during the work week and treat myself to one or two nice, high quality pieces of meat on the weekends (jokesters, stay away!). Mostly I try to stay away from “cheap lunch meat” and “cheap chicken”
– Cut back on produced/packaged foods, though I allow myself guilty pleasures in small doses- and on a daily basis actually (chocolate, the occasional spoon of nutella, pecans, a diet soda here and there)
– I throw in the occasional green juice (whenever I feel I haven’t been good enough and could use the extra nutrients – yeah Joe Cross and Breville, you guys got to me!)
– Because I can’t stay away from chocolate, but am convinced that as a society we are consuming more simple carbs than we need to I severely cut back on wheat, potatoes, noodles, bread (but not beans or rice, since I’ve never overeaten on those to begin with)
– I try to make my lunch vegetables only, but because it’s “only” vegatables I try to make those super delicious and resemble a full dinner plate: for example grilled and smothered in garlic portobello mushrooms can pass as a meat replacement, I have a nice salad with cranberries and walnuts and raspberry dressing as my fruit and veggie portion on the plate and my favorite beans or something as my starch
– I drink more water
– Doing this allows me to almost never be hungry and for my two cents, I think staying away from sugars and simple carbs is a huge part of helping me not to have cravings all the time;
– It also means that when I fall off the wagon (and I do that at least 1-2x during the work weeks) I don’t have to beat myself up over it at all; on the weekends I give myself leeway to eat whatever I want, though since I’ve started all of this I tend to eat healthier then, too just out of habit
– As a side effect so to speak, because I stay away from carbs I almost never have cheese anymore and very little dairy and I think it’s part of the reason my skin has been behaving slightly better
– Since doing this (approx. 1 year now), I’ve actually lost only a little bit of weight, but my skin is different and I feel significantly more energized and even though my weight is almost the same, I just feel really good in my own body
– Sometimes I fall off the wagon for weeks at a time because life just gets in the way but I try to stay relaxed about it and eventually return to better habits a few weeks later (mostly I think, because I refuse to pressure myself too much)
Most probably an overshare, but hey, it’s Friday…
If you’re not eating meat, dairy, carbs, or much in the way of beans (or maybe you just meant not in a rice-and-beans combo), what do you eat? Just vegetables and nuts?
Parker - Boardroombelles
TBK, for a weekday lunch that’s true enough – I try to stick to only vegetables (though they are grilled in lots of oil and garlic usually) and nuts. But like I said above I eat meat, just much less than I used to. On weekends I have whatever food I want and though I have much less dairy than I used to, I still get about about a cup of milk with my daily coffee intake. It’s not like I never eat any dairy, meat or carbs anymore, I just attempt to not make them my primary food groups – and rather have that be nutrient rich foods like vegetables and plant oils. Since vegetables have truly become my main food focus, I don’t beat myself up so easily anymore for falling off the wagon occasionally (and quite regularly, to be honest). I think by focusing on veggies and allowing myself quite a few “missteps” I’ve arrived at a more balanced diet than most of these diets propagate. Mostly, I am more relaxed and healthier.
I only mentioned the beans because Paleo considers them as too starchy to have often and that’s too extreme of a definition for me personally. I believe when I restrict potatoes, noodles etc. restricting beans, too is overkill.
I did the Whole30 challenge for a month (basically hard core version of Paleo- no nuts, beans, artificial sweeteners, minimal fruit, etc.). It was really tough and I missed chocolate, alcohol and carbs a lot. I did not end up sticking with it and I didn’t lose any weight but I felt like it was a net positive: I kicked my artificial sweetener habit completely. Don’t even miss it. Same with peanutbutter- I was eating two jars a week before and after Whole30 I went months without it. I no longer craved chocolate every night. My skin looked absolutely amazing- “glowing.” And, my libido was through the roof! Super random, but it happened. FWIW, no night night sweats, no headaches, no bad breath, no fatigue or headaches or anything like that. Give it a try! You can always quit if you don’t like it.
I don’t think it’s that these foods are actually bad for you – it’s that people eat too much of it and aren’t getting enough veggies, fruits, whole grains and the like. Not getting enough fruits and veggies can lead to vitamin deficiencies, which can cause health problems (including headaches) and eating refined carbs instead of whole grains can spike your blood sugar and give you energy highs and lows, which is why I think so many people say that their headaches went away and they had more energy after giving up flour or gluten or refined sugars. It’s not those foods itself were causing problems (unless you actually have an allergy or sensitivity to them), it’s that you weren’t getting enough good stuff!
interesting, I hadn’t thought of it from that perspective either. Very helpful!
Cutting gluten forced me to make healthier decisions when I removed things like bread as options. I have felt less bloated and overall less gross, so I stick with it. I have recently noticed that “cheap grains” like rice and corn also make me feel gross, so also be mindful of gluten-free options that are still cheap grains.
Parker - Boardroom Belles
In one of the documentaries someone made a point I found very helpful that goes along with what you said. Rather than focusing on cutting out the bad foods (which is what diets do) try to focus in on adding in the good stuff (vegetable juices, veggies, plant oils). Eventually you’ll probably kick the bad stuff because your body will receive more nutrients and have less cravings for them.
I gave up wheat for lent. It’s been a little over a week, I don’t feel any better or worst. I probably have been eating more white rice, and I’m not limiting sugar or anything else so probably no net health benefit for me.
Honestly I think a general whole/natural foods with as little processed food as possible is a better and more holistic goal than blindly cutting out food groups. I agree with a lot of commentary that wonders when people go on these very restrictive diets, are they benefitting from cutting out food group X or benefitting from cutting out bad processed foods? I would say to try to eliminate chemicals, additives, salt, corn syrup, etc. and other similar things from your diet first without worrying about specific food groups like dairy or carbs being the culprits. Once you start reading labels of even ‘healthy’ things, you realize how much bad stuff is in food (corn syrup/artificial sweeteners in everything, so much salt, chemicals you can’t pronounce, etc). Maybe start there.
Also, this means you don’t have to eliminate things like baked goods… why not just make them all yourself? I simply don’t believe that a muffin you make yourself with whole wheat flour, milk, fresh fruit, etc. = Sara Lee oily muffin with radioactive colored “blue berries” that could be shelf stable for years.
Concentrate on adding more whole foods to your life, making more things, buying less that is traditionally processed… then maybe go from there on being more restrictive.
This. I think WHAT you eat matters far less than that you eat it as close to its natural state as possible. Brown rice, whole wheat, organic meats, fresh fruits and veggies raw or cooked simply, no “fake food.”
Word up. This is my guiding principle when eating food. I try to make as much from scratch as I can (although I’m not much of a baker, so I buy stuff like bread pre-made); eat lots of differently-colored fruits and veggies; and consume minimal meat. It works for me.
Kontractor, I know quite a bit about gluten intolerance, celiac and wheat/gluten and -not to be argumentative – you’re not seeing the whole picture. A portion of the US population (perhaps 5-10%) IS gluten-sensitive and would be better off cutting it out entirely, and most of those people won’t know unless they eliminate gluten on a trial (because there are currently no medical tests for gluten intolerance – the science hasn’t caught up yet). Before I went gluten-free (at my MD’s suggestion) I can promise you I never ate a Sara Lee muffin, plus I cooked almost entirely from scratch, made my own whole-wheat bread, cookies etc. Giving up processed foods would not have helped me and will not help those with gluten intolerance/sensitivity. Yes, it’s probably not good to willy-nilly give up food groups but in the case of gluten, it is a good thing to give up on a trial basis. Eating a no-wheat diet isn’t unhealthy if you get sufficient nutrients from other grains (rice, quinoa, buckwheat, teff, sorghum etc) and eat a mainly whole-foods diet (minimally processed).
There’s obviously a difference if you are gluten-intolerant here. But, shockingly enough, *every single person in the world* does not have a gluten sensitivity, and every single person in the world will not necessarily benefit by jumping on the gluten-free train.
To a: Did you not read my comment? Or you just had reading failure. I said 5-10% MIGHT have gluten sensitivity, and that applies only to Northern Americans and Europeans, the main readers of this site. No way did I say every single person.
About 1.5% of the population has celiac, according to the latest research and that percentage is increasing, and incidence is higher now than in the 1950s. Additionally 97-99% of people with celiac are undiagnosed. Non-celiac gluten intolerance is a medically recognized condition, for which there currently are no medical tests (except excluding other diseases). FWIW, IBS and fibromylagia are also diseases that are medically recognized that also have no defined tests and are diseases of exclusion.
Hit reply too soon.
So if there is no medical test available to determine gluten-intolerance, the only test is to give up gluten (called an elimination diet) and see if the person feels better. This is a good reason to “jump on the gluten-free train” and you shouldn’t discourage people from trying it.
This is pretty much what I try to do. I don’t eat a lot of things that I don’t make myself.
Yea, sort of. I’ve been transitioning into paleo for about 3 weeks now. It’s not for everyone but personally I’ve noticed such improvement in the way I feel. Don’t know if it’s because of no more flour in my diet but I’m noticing little to no bloating. As an aside, I’m also becoming more aware of what chemicals are added to food and, like you say, it’s not pretty. I’m a baked goods lover, too but it was surprisingly easy to give up in the short term. Longterm, we’ll see. What is it that you want to accomplish by eliminating flour? You might try phasing it out for a week or two and see if it does anything for you. Let us know how it goes.
Thanks for this. I do try to make a lot of stuff from scratch (something I enjoy doing/consuming) so it seems impossible to do it forever. I guess bottom line, I don’t feel great and am trying to get to the root of the problem. Given my diet, I’m inclined to think it’s wheat related and/or dairy. Or something medical, but given my other issues there it gets complicated really quick to test for ‘maybes.’
I do really appreciate all the thoughtful comments. With so many options it seems overwhelming to start somewhere!
To L or anyone else thinking about giving up wheat: Before you give up wheat, you should be tested for celiac, which is a tricky disease to diagnose. You must be eating wheat for the blood test to be accurate, but the blood test is somewhat unreliable (false negatives). Some doctors are hesitant to test for celiac in adults especially if the patient isn’t rail thin and sickly. There are many potential signs of gluten intolerance/sensitivity and/or celiac and they are bloating, intestinal symptoms, headaches/migranes, mouth ulcers, depression and infertility. Keep pressing if your doc refuses.
Y’know I’ve had friends lose a weight on paleo/gluten free and I’ve had friends lose weight on sugar free and I’ve had friends lose weight being vegan. My guess is, it doesn’t matter at all (regarding weight loss — the other benefits strike me as placebo effect, which can last up to 2 years, which seems to be about the time people start saying their bodies have “adjusted” to whatever and start looking for another fad), EXCEPT that all of these people have to give up candy bars and (most) baked goods and pretty much have to eat at home. I suspect that if people with pretty regular metabolisms did those three things, they’d lose weight.
There’s also some evidence that whatever you eat first thing in the morning “preps” your body for eating that the rest of the day. Limiting your diet may improve your body’s function in that way, but again it’s scant evidence.
(Note that almost all weight loss and exercise “studies” are conducted on white males in their early 20s who have no other health problems. Yay science!)
I’ve been off gluten for about a year. I had a lifelong rash (periodic outbreaks, of varying severity) that finally got annoying enough to get a real diagnosis from a doctor, rather than just another steroid cream. The doctor had me do a rotation diet and I could tell after a few days without gluten that was what had been causing me trouble (test confirmed this). On the one hand, I sometimes get annoyed by people who go “gluten-free” for fun or 80-95% gluten-free, because a lot of restaurants assume that is what I mean when I say I have a wheat allergy, and they don’t take it seriously. However, I suspect more people could benefit from limiting or abstaining from wheat than those who have a reactive allergy or celiac spru. Not only did my rash go away, and other symptoms that would accompany it, but my stomach is a lot flatter. I weigh the same thing now as I did before I was diagnosed (I did lose a few pounds on the rotation diet because it was so limited, but went back to my normal weight after a month or so), but my stomach never feels distended or bloated. I always thought my body type was such that I carried a lot of fat in my stomach, but I think I must have always been a little distended/inflamed. And it’s not like my diet is perfect- one thing about being 100% gluten-free is that when I am away from home, I sometimes rely on gluten-free packaged foods, so I’ve had plenty of gluten-free cookies, breads, etc. My husband, who eats wheat at lunch at work but not at home with me or when we go out together (usually) has also remarked how he has fewer instances of tummy troubles when he eats gluten-free, although it’s not like they were severe before, just what I expect most people experience when eating too much of any one thing.
Has anyone here dealt with PCOS? It was recently suggested that I may have it based on some symptoms. I’m going in for tests next week, and maybe I don’t even have it. But it would explain some things. I’m getting a little worried already…
I have it, and my symptoms are well-controlled with medication, but it took finding the right endocrinologist to get to this point.
I have it (was diagnosed in college). It’s not a big deal in my life. I control my blood sugar/weight issues with diet (mainly) and exercise (secondary). I control the hormone issues with birth control pills. I control the thin hair issue by cutting my hair really short. And after about 12 years of really bad skin, it’s finally cleared up and looks okay (no one will ever claim I have beautiful skin, but it’s good enough). However, I’ve never TTC so I can’t comment on that.
I’d suggest finding a good endocrinologist and a diabetic dietician (only takes a few sessions, but he/she can be very helpful).
Ditto. I was diagnosed in 2004 and have been on Metformin since then. I got on spironolactone 3 years ago and it has been a Godsend. It totally eliminated most of my secondary symptoms, including the hair loss, weird hair growth, and a lot of my migraines and mood swings. You cannot be on it if you are trying to conceive or you might get pregnant – my doc only gave it to me because I have an IUD – but it really made a big, positive difference in my life. I also eat a low-carb diet and exercise but I had been doing that for years before the spirono.
PCOS isn’t the end of the world but different people experience symptoms at different levels of severity. I was a mess before I got diagnosed and had been for a couple of years. A Mirena IUD, nutrition, medication, exercise and some lifestyle changes have made my PCOS something that is present in my life, but that doesn’t control my life. PCOS does predispose you to long-term problems with your cardiac health and to diabetes if it’s not controlled, so it’s important to see a good endocrinologist who knows what he/she is talking about when it comes to PCOS, and get good treatment. Good luck.
Check out the forum section of this site: http://www.tcoyf.com/
There are often discussions about PCOS
This may be more a long term thing, but there is a blog called Prevention RD and I believe the blogger has PCOS. The recipes she posts are generally healthy and would be good for someone dealing with PCOS.
I have it as well. I’ve had different difficulties, but the severe pain is (mostly) helped by medicine. I haven’t seriously altered my life – I know it would be better in some areas if I did, but I’m not currently in a position to do this due to other matters.
I’ve been a bit out of pocket this week, so just wanted to post this in case it hadn’t made its way here yet.
I’m interested to read Sandberg’s book and see how much I agree/disagree.
Yes! Me too. I posted the link on the Weekly News Roundup, but I’m glad you posted it here because more people read the comments here.
One thing I’ve noticed is that the early articles about her book seem to imply that the book will talk about women needing to “lean in” but ALSO about structural or societal changes that are needed to help women gain equality in the business world. The more recent articles focus more on the first prong. If that’s all the book talks about, then I don’t think it’s as useful.
Another thing this makes me contemplate is almost an idea of “trickle down equality.” (Not that this is a real term…) I started thinking about it because a lot of critiques of Sandberg focus on the fact that she is privileged and her advice isn’t applicable. However, if more women get positiosn of power, they can hopefully help other women who are qualified also make it to positions of power and that effect will help all women make gains. I think this idea has some traction. Without things changing at the top, things at the bottom will never change. Maybe? Is this idealistic or misguided? Thoughts?
Hey–I did see your response to the link I posted on the last thread. I haven’t read the book either, so fair enough.
I think whenever someone prominent outlines an issue of inequality as being part systemic and part Your Problem, their argument about it being Your Problem always gains more traction. That approach is more palatable, more actionable, and makes better material for talk show appearances. So if the bias you outline is in fact going on, it’s entirely to be expected (though of course unfortunate).
As for trickle-down equality, I’m just too much the cynic. Obviously it’s no powerful insight to point out that Sandberg has clout and resources beyond the wildest dreams of most working women, but that is the case. Personally I think the disparity is so severe that if I were her I would not feel it was my place to be giving professional advice in the first place. I’d probably stick to advocacy for women’s work opportunities on the systemic scale, if that really is her passion, and acknowledge every time I took the podium that I was the extremely rare exception.
I admittedly don’t follow this all closely enough to have an opinion. I am always inherently skeptical of anyone to says: “I always thought I would run a social movement.”
However, “Lean In Circle” aside, I do agree with everything from the book synopsis provided in the article:
“In her book, she urges them to absorb the social science showing they are judged more harshly and paid less than men; resist slowing down in mere anticipation of having children; insist that their husbands split housework equally; draft short- and long-term career plans; and join a “Lean In Circle,” which is half business school and half book club.”
I rolled my eyes at that quote as well.
I will most likely hate read this book. I didn’t 100% agree with Ann-Marie Slaughter either but appreciate the fact that she is so publicly calling out Sheryl Sandberg for being rather blind to her own privileged.
I think I will read this also. Professioneal women like us have to do ALL we can to ensure we MAINTAIN equality as WELL as equity in the work place. Sheryl Sandberg is a great roll model for all of us.
There is also the OTHER woman I look up to also, I forgot her name, from Google and NOW at YAHOO. She is VERY pretty and very smart and she just had a BABY! She prooves we can do it all if we want to. Work, Home LIfe and Leadership. YAY!!!!! I hope one day to meet both of them, mabye on a panel I can speak at when I am a judge or a manageing partner (after the manageing partner retires, that is).
Right now, the manageing partner is happy with me, and he still wants to make me a partner, but I have to assigne over my 401K to the partnership to make my capital contribution, and DAD has to put up the diference in $$CASH. Dad is NOT happy about this, but he said he would pay unless I was abel to get MARRIED this year and then he would make my HUSBAND pay the money in. FOOEY, b/c a guy might not marry me if my dad is goeing to force him to pay for my partnership fee’s.
Considering I do NOT even have a boyfreind, I do NOT see this hapening any time soon. FOOEY! So I will need for DAD to put up the money, but I will pay him back with all of the profit’s I will get as a PARTNER in the firm! YAY!!!!!!!
I wish the HIVE a great weekend, and I hope to have a good time with Myrna and will report back if it is interesting enough for the HIVE!
I’m curious about her book and will probably end up reading it. As others have pointed out, she has resources that 10x exceed what is available for most women, and I wish she would be more up front about it in her public appearances.
The lean-in circle sounds like something that I would want to participate in, mostly because I crave that interaction with other professional women outside of my office / my field.
Also, I hope some of the conversation is geared towards women examining what they personally want. As the typical over-achiever who grew up wanting to have a high-powered executive position, I sometimes feel guilty that I’m not sure I want that anymore (even if that’s the track that I am on). I am in my late 20’s, and can totally imagine being content with a position where I can go home at 5 and not think about work for the evening and spend time with my family instead (granted I have no family now, so maybe that is what Sandberg is talking about). Unfortunately it seems like I can’t have that and be professionally challenged at the same time (vs. just staying in the same job for 20 yrs and eventually being bored out of my mind). I’m not sure how me “leaning in” will change that.
Young, married but childless so far. I have mixed feelings. I don’t begrudge her the success she’s had–I definitely see a lot of criticisms that are really just judgments of her and her luck+success. On the one hand, I don’t like the “blame the victim” mentality that her views sometimes represent. Of course women are going to mentally pull back when it looks like they have (1) no broad protections for their job during the course of pregnancy, especially in small businesses or during difficult pregnancies (see the recent Slate article on the trouble with existing maternity leave/disability policies related to pregnancy) (2) limited options for affordable, high-quality childcare and (3) major institutional barriers to career advancement. I don’t feel like I am “pulling back” from work right now, but thinking about some of these possible issues is a big headache. Plus, it makes me worry that some men will just say “of course, see! Even women agree it’s that other women aren’t ambitious enough!” and be done with it.
On the other hand, it is bringing up the level of discourse above the previous “mommy wars”/work vs stay at home standard. We’re moving beyond the “I work”/”I stay at home” mentality and moving towards a more flexible idea of what work could be. I think most employers, though, haven’t caught up to this ideal of flexibility quite yet though. And I would hope that all of this-parental leave, more flexwork possibilities, less stigma to parenting–would be applicable to the men in my life as well as the women.
I’m unlikely to read the book, because I’ve read enough interviews with her, seen enough talks, etc., to get the gist. And the truth is, I agree with a lot of it. I feel like Sandberg often gets criticized unfairly – her message is targeted to women with certain types of goals and certain types of jobs. I often see comments in response to stories about her that are all, “but what about people who want lower key jobs? what about people who choose to stay home? what about people who want to to work part time?”
But Sandberg’s not writing for them. She writing for women who want to make the C-suite or be managing partner. She’s writing for people who have made a decision that professional success is one of the msot important, if not the most important drivers in their lives. It’s highly taboo for women to say that – our families are supposed to always be priority one – but we exist.
I also think that her advice on self-defeating behaviors is worth taking. Yes, structural change is necessary. But if you listen to her, she says that she focuses on internal change because structural change gets more attention. I see women all around me making the kinds of mistakes that she writes about, and I see them in myself. Is it enough to remove the barriers we all face? No. But is it necessary to doing so? Yes.
I “leaned back” after I had my son. I have exactly zero regrets about it. I would never presume to tell anyone else what the “right” choice for them might be. The decision whether or not to “lean in” or “lean back” is incredibly personal and has a lot to do with family finances, the state of your marriage/relationship, your own personal desires related to your career and motherhood, etc. Anyone – whether it’s Sheryl Sandberg or Phyllis Schlafly – claiming that there is one right or wrong solution for working moms is delusional. Myself personally, climbing “the ladder” was not as important to me as making sure I could be at my son’s soccer games and Parents’ Nights and all the rest of it. My husband is very involved but I did not want to dump all the parenting on him so I could pursue my career. I honestly do not have very lofty career ambitions for myself and feel fine with not being Ms. Super-High-Achiever so that I can be with my family more. Everyone else’s mileage may vary, and no one should be judged for feeling like I do, totally opposite from the way I do, or somewhere in the middle.
Sheryl is one of those folks who was “born on third base, and thinks she hit a triple.” Wealthy privileged educated family, double Harvard, protege of Larry Summers, stellar career opportunities all the way through her life, mega-rich. No offense, but I doubt she has very much understanding of the life of a working mom middle-class middle manager toiling in corporate America and trying to balance career and family. “Lean in” is a great strategy for women who have enough financial resources to cover nearly any eventuality, including outsourcing of all household work, hiring full-time nannies, covering for loss of partner’s income if partner bails, etc. Sheryl’s advice worked for her in her situation. It’s not applicable to very many more folks out there outside of the 1%, that I can see.
I think you are the person cbackson means when she says “she is not talking to you” ….
This. Sheryl Sandberg isn’t saying everyone has to make her choices. She’s saying that if you want to make her choices, here’s how you do it successfully (or at least, here’s how you can try to remove the barriers to success that you do control).
And yet…in all of that news coverage the NYT says she’s going to be generating for her book, I don’t see anything where Sheryl is saying, “oh, sorry, folks! This is really only meant for .0001 percent of women who may at some point want to be a c-suite executive AND a mom someday. My bad if anyone was under another impression.” I saw in the NYT article where Cosmopolitan Magazine is going to do some kind of huge supplement (40 pages?) talking about “leaning in” in April. I wasn’t aware that Cosmo is the go-to magazine of choice for future c-suite executives? But maybe I’m out of the loop.
And honestly – “Lean In circles?” Most working mothers I know are so busy that the last thing they want to do with a free hour that isn’t devoted to kids, spouse, work, household chores or exercise is sit around with other women and talk about Sheryl’s brilliant ideas. I’m headed to the spa, thanks anyway.
But that isn’t really her place. Her place is to say here is what worked/works for me. It is for the reader to decide if the message applies to them. And while not everyone aspires to the c-suite, not everyone to languish in middle management either. Rather than malign Sandberg, take from it what works for you, what can apply to where you want to be in your life, and leave the rest behind. I don’t think you have to have the same experiences to find value in what she says.
You, know, one could characterize this board as a “Lean In Circle” of sorts. People ask for advice, seek and give encouragement, comfort etc… for other women, and sometimes way to frequently, working moms/mom-to-bes. So while the title may be off-putting, the concept is already in practice. I’d personally love a group where professional aspiration, while balancing motherhood, is not judged, but instead managed. One of the big consulting companies in DC used to do these quarterly events specifically for professional moms. They were great, and being with other women who were succeeding professionally, while raising their kids was empowering and encouraging….
Yes! cbackson and Divalicious articulated my feelings much better than I could.
I also agree that the “Lean In” circle might have a weird name, but I would also love a real-life circle of women who are succeeding to bounce ideas off of and commiserate with. I think some people call these arrangements “mentoring circles.”
The group was called Big Jobs, Little Kids. Some of the organizers have moved on to other roles, but I thnk this was exactly what she meant….
Shoe TJ – What shoes to wear with this dress (link to follow) to a formal non-work-related event?
Apparently most women at the event will be wearing long dresses, but younger women frequently wear c*cktail dresses so I’m not in technical breach of the dress code. I decided the colour and beading make the dress more formal, but I need to add to that formal feeling with the shoe….
Any ideas? I’d like to keep the cost around or under $150.
Ooh, I would wear a bright pink shoe. I love pink and navy together.
These are nice:
In the magenta, not the silver. Although the silver would go with your dress, too.
I like the idea of a hot pink shoe and a hot pink lip – I am stalking pink shoes on the internets….
Have you seen the Joan & David Gila? It’s hot pink patent with a bow. Very cute. And a kitten heel, so should be reasonably comfortable?
Ooh that styling sounds amazing. Love the shoe with the dress, and I think a bright pink lip would be smashing.
If it is true black tie I actually think the beading makes it less formal
I disagree. Anyway, she said “formal” not “black tie.” But as we’ve established here a million times, dressy c*cktail works even at black tie in almost all cases.
Silver would also work.
Curses! Stuck in moderation. But I said gold pumps. Go to Zappos and look for the RSVP Gigi (gold), Vince Camuto Harty (Light Champagne), and the Enzo Angiolini Infinity (gold).
I need to vent – online job applications are incredibly frustrating. I discovered a job that I am interested in and qualified for today. It closes tomorrow at midnight. I have spent the last three hours on the website trying to input information. The website keeps freezing. I’ve tried different browsers, no luck. It also keeps erasing the information I have entered even though I hit save every time I input new information. The number for employment services on the website goes straight to voicemail.
SO F-ING FRUSTRATING! WHY DO YOU MAKE IS SO HARD EMPLOYERS?!?!?!
I hate online application systems. I miss the good ol’ days of mailing an application and calling (a real person!) to verify receipt.
:: glass of wine :: Good luck today. May it be worth it!
Wow I didn’t think I was that young, but I got my first job post-college off craigslist.
It kept timing me out. I gave up. Sigh.
Not sure if it well help since it’s already really late on a Friday, but can you find a main number you can call, explain the situation, and ask to be transeferred to someone in HR? Even if you can’t do it today, I would try on Monday if you are really interested in the job. Chance are that if you are having problems with the online application, other people are too and they might be willing to extend the deadline.
I called the number listed for Employment Matters and it went straight to voicemail. Hitting buttons didn’t get me anywhere. Plus at 4:00 p.m. on a Friday in a gov’t contractors office? No one will be there anyway.
I will definitely look and see if it is still up on Monday and try to reach out to someone at the office again.
I have a suspicion that my bank holds pending debit card charges and deposits/transfers for when my checking account balance gets low in order to maximize overdraft fees. Several times in the last year, I’ve had charges and deposits be pending for several days (3-5) and then finally go through in a manner – out of the order they were charged and deposited – that causes overdrafts.
I recognize that maintaining my checking account balance is my own responsibility – but has anyone noticed this happen to them? Or can anyone in banking confirm that it’s at least possible? I bank with a major, national bank.
At the beginning of this fall I had two or three weeks’ worth of small transactions (lunch and/or coffee from the office building’s cafeteria, about 2-6 dollars each) hit all at once. (Yes it was my responsibility to keep track of my expesnes, but come on, we know so many of us don’t– I had to expense something for work that was about $600, and got caught up in red tape with the reimbursement check. So when all those transactions hit, I was slammed with I like 5 overdraft fees.)
Your theory didn’t occur to me, I hope it’s not the case, but it does suck and seems very odd for those things to happen. Try giving them a call, the guy I chatted with agreed that it was reasonable that I wouldn’t notice a 4 dollar debit charge not being posted when I was checking my account on a weekly basis, and they waived a bunch of the charges, I think I had to pay one or two.
This *is* possible – but my understanding was, back in 2010ish when the Federal Reserve required you to “opt-in” to overdraft protection (rather than just having your card declined when you are overdrawn which is, um, much more logical than having you pay $28 for that cup of coffee), some states also enacted laws (or potentially some banks voluntarily did this — I know I got a letter to this effect) that they would process the transactions in the order they were made, not by “largest transaction first.”
But yes, banks can and do do that, very often, unless it is either illegal in your state or they’ve said they won’t. It means more money for them.
I realize you can’t do this when purchasing online, but one of the things I’ve done is always use my card as debit when I’m doing a transaction in person. These come out immediately and all me to track my account better.
I have noticed that transactions can sometimes take a very long time to actually hit, and sometimes will even show up as processing for a few days and then “fall off” for a day or two only to hit as an actual charge. The period where they “fall off” is obviously the most difficult to track.
I wouldn’t put it past banks to hold charges as processing until the account is low. Banks are notoriously terrible to ordinary customers and have been caught in the past using unfair (and unlawful) tactics to collect more fees / revenue.
Yes, banks absolutely do that. It’s happened to me more than once (when Mr. Banker got upset with me because his wife came up on the Overdraft Report he explained this practice to me.)
Evil, but common.
Yes, banks do this. Obama tried to propose a bill to prevent them from rigging the system to get more overdraft fees.
Because I’ve been hit by this in the past, I’ve switched to charging everything to a credit card (CC’s also have much better consumer protections than debit cards). I’ve also switched to a smallish bank where I get some pretty cool perks if I maintain an average balance that is roughly equal to what I’d keep in a savings account for emergency expenses anyway. With interest rates so low, the perks are worth more than the interest I’m “losing” by not maintaining a separate savings account.
Yes, this. Always use your credit card, people. It’s strongly to your benefit to do so.
Yup. I almost never pay for anything with my debit card. Always use credit. I get points from my card, which I can use as a credit to my account; build my credit history; and don’t have to deal with my scheisty bank (looking at you, Wells Fargo, and looking forward to moving back to the US and kicking you to the curb for a credit union).
“Always use your credit card” AND pay it off in full every month!! But I agree, always use a credit card.
Also, if you have a problem with a transaction and need to dispute it, the money hasn’t come out of your account yet. That’s key, particularly if you’re buying something very expensive (plane tickets, vacations, etc.). While debit cards often offer dispute protection like credit cards now, the money is still out of your account until you get the dispute process rolling and they re-credit you.
Banks do this, as others have mentioned. I extremely rarely used to overdraft (pre Dodd-Frank) and I notices this pattern immediately–they process the big charges quickly to push you to overdraft, then tack on fees for all of the smaller purchases that should have posted sooner, so they get tons of fees.
First, I would elect to turn off overdraft (I am fine with the shame of being denied in person) or using another card/cash if there’s no money in my account. I would also call up and b_tch and tell them that this is a silly practice, you won’t stand for it, and you’ll take your business elsewhere if they don’t reverse some of the fees and process the transactions in a better, more logical order. If the operator you’re speaking with is not helpful, talk to a manager. Any time I get hit with a fee (not overdraft) and I do this with my bank (WF) they balk and at least halve the fees, if not eliminate entirely. Time to be “firm customer” on the phone and see where it gets you.
BofA use to do this to me as well. Really caused a lot of heartache in college, when I was barely eeking by, and thought I had everything planned down to the dollar. The solution? Switch banks.
I’m sure that they do this. They generally explain it as assuming that the bigger transactions are more important and that you thus would want them to go through first. I’m sure that the terms and conditions of your account allow it. It’s frustrating. I’ve totally been there–as the customer who that happened to and as the attorney defending a bank against a claim for doing this. Generally, they will waive them once, then that’s it. What helped me was to set up an automatic text message notice if my account gets below a certain point.
What do you think is a reasonable price to pay for a cocktail dress to wear to weddings? I love J. Crew and Ann Taylor’s, but $230-250 seems to be the going rate. Is that standard? I haven’t bought a semiformal dress in years, and it seems steep to me.
What do you think is a reasonable price to pay for a semiformal dress to wear to weddings? I love J. Crew and Ann Taylor’s, but $230-250 seems to be the going rate. Is that standard? I haven’t bought a semiformal dress in years, and it seems steep to me.
Parker - Boardroombelles
You can get a nice semi-formal dress from Banana Republic for $ 150, but they’ve regularly got sales for 30% or 40%. Since they’ve introduced tall sizes for dresses they are one of my favorite companies for dresses.
Nordstrom also has great dresses under $ 150.
Personally though, I think one can get away with a rather cheap dress, as long as it is in a flattering cut, good quality and accessories pull it together to an actual outfit rather than a haphazard collection of items that have landed on your body.
They have a 30% off sale today, actually!
Oops, meant to specify banana republic.
You are paying for the brand and their marketing. Try Nordstrom, Dillards or Lord & Taylor for something similar under $200.
I recently got a semiformal dress at Dillards for $89. Not on sale. They had a good selection for under $100.
maximum $100. try to pay more like $30-50.
Yep I try to keep it under $100 – a larger Macy’s is my go-to.
I usually start at a TJ Maxx/Marshall’s/Loehmann’s, and then go from there.
What is this I don’t even. http://www.zappos.com/irregular-choice-rosie-joy-gold
Sshh those are ELLEN’s.
The sole! The sole! Did you look at the sole?! But in some ways they’re kind of awesome. As in awe-inspiring. As in, w. t. f. (but sparkly).
Oh, wow, I didn’t see the sole. That is amazing.
Thank you for that. I did not look at the sole, but upon your comment, I reopened the link. It was worth it.
I actually love the sole. The rest of the shoe looks like someone took a Bedazzler to a cowboy-booted golden dinosaur.
Hah! a., that’s hilarious. … … kind of wish I had a Bedazzler right now.
Where are Godzilla and a Bedazzler when you need ’em.
I almost bought these because they’re gold gold gold even though I would never ever ever wear them. http://www.zappos.com/grazie-brenton-bronze
Yes, I have a problem. And it is gold. And I have way too many outfits that would go PERFECTLY with the pair you posted.
I know, bro, I know.
they’d be perfect for a desi wedding… balance out all the bling on top
No? Not a good match for my dress?
I’m pretty sure it’s made for people while they’re on hallucinatory drugs. Looking at the sparkles and then flipping it over and looking at the sole would provide hours of entertainment, I’m sure.
Yes, I agree! My first thought when looking at them was “This is what I imagine it would be like to use LSD.”
Well now that they are on sale…..
Irregular choice is right.
No way. I am waiting for the price to come down more. Then I will have the PERFECT outfit for the new wizard of oz movie premiere.
It’s a cat toy in the shape of a shoe! My cat would go bananas for these.
Dear First Years,
When you know that the whole team will be working 20+ hours a day all weekend, please do not tell me that you cannot work from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday for religious reasons because you “aren’t really all that religious but [you] kinda make some effort to observe most of the time.”
Super P!ssed Senior Associate Who Will Be Having a Chat with Partner and HR About This (and understands that a religious OBLIGATION comes before work, but something you sorta kinda try to do sometimes because it makes your mom happy definitely does not)
Is it possible she felt kind of silly asking, and was trying to downplay it?
Wow. This sounds to me like someone trying to down play their religion so they won’t be know as that crazy religious one. Complaining about this in my office would be a big mistake. I’d be annoyed, but sticking with ok, good to know, but in the future please give me more of a heads up about your religious obligations so I can plan accordingly.
I don’t understand. This is a religious obligation. A well-known religious obligation, actually.
Also, please try to be more accepting or not resentful of your non-Christian/Catholic coworkers. We’ll be there during Christmas and Thanksgiving and Easter and whatever other else holiday is really important to you.
+1 The calendar is built for Christians. This associate can now be your go-to for that last minute Christmas Eve assignment — score! Everyone winds up happy.
I wish honestly at the beginning of each year, people would put a calendar together that says L off X religious holiday(s), Ru off Y (religious holidays), etc and give to their respective bosses. It’d be so much easier for planning purposes. you’d think by now we’d recognize the system is set up to favor one religion and try to fix it. yeesh.
idk…Those holidays are on all my calendars. Maybe like if you are Wiccan. (No offense to anyone but my aunts are Wiccan and none of their holidays are on my standard calendars).
You’re awesome, Ru. Thank you.
This was my reaction too. Saying you make some effort to observe a holiday most of the time sounds like kind of a roundabout way of saying you to do observe it, regularly. I agree that saying directly that you have a religious obligation is better but it sounds like that’s what the first year was trying to say. I agree with others below that its perfectly reasonable to ask for more advance notice next time, since religious holidays are set way in advance. Other than that though, your reaction seems pretty unreasonable to me. A religious obligation is a religious obligation and like it or not, its kind of a trump card. This is a pretty important Jewish holiday and all Jewish holidays are observed for a full 24 hours, so its not like this person is making something up or exaggerating the length or importance of the holiday. If I were the partner or in HR, this would reflect much more poorly on you than it would on the first year.
Oops, this was meant to be in reply to momentsofabsurdity but as a Jew who has worked just about every Christmas, Easter and Good Friday since joining my firm, I very much agree with Ru’s comments too.
Would I be annoyed at first year? Yes. But I can see a way to discuss this with HR / higher ups without coming off totally unreasonable. My advice would be to keep it to venting on here and with your peers.
I’m going to back pedal on this one. My coworker tells me that it’s also a holiday this weekend. I don’t know that much about this particular faith, but I would be upset if someone questioned whether I’m really Christian enough to not work on Easter or any other Christian holiday.
I think you will be the one having to have a chat with HR if you complain about this- and not in the way you are thinking.
+1. Slow your roll, dude.
I don’t know, it’s a holiday so I think I’d grant some leeway on this one (I’m assuming the first year is Jewish). Also, I second MOA — most biglaw isn’t terribly acommodating to religion in general and I could see feeling awkward about asking this. I remember getting a big reaction when I mentioned attending Maundy Thursday services (not because I was asking for time off, but more an FYI I’ll do this Wed so I can go to services Thurs) as in “whoa, people who work here actually do something like that?” And I’m Christian. Plus I’d feel weird about dictating how observant someone has to be in order to get a religious accomodation. I think the associate owed it to you to give you lots of notice if s/he would be unavailable, but I wouldn’t be completely pissed. This does mean that this associate is on deck for the next late night/crappy job, hopefully relieving someone else.
Also, this kind of reaction is why I got out of biglaw.
I used to work in biglaw in NY, and we had a lot of Jewish associates and partners, some of whom were strictly observant of Jewish teachings. This was tough when you were on a deal, but everyone understood. You need to understand. The timing and delivery could have been better, but…it is the associate’s legal right to take that time.
I will also add that we had a ton of “not very religious but suddenly religious” Jewish foks when the high holy days fell on weekdays. But fair’s fair–the rest of the firm got Christmas off, for instance. It was really our firm/society’s fault for emphasizing one religion over another.
Also, you can set boundaries too. I mean this with love, but if you need to go the gym, or the doctor, or need sanity time…remember that although such things are not necessarily legally protected like religion, you should take time for yourself too, no matter how crazy your transaction/biglaw situation is. Good luck this weekend.
–ex-banker, biglaw lady who’s had her share of nightmare weeks/months/deals
Ha! By all means have a chat with biglaw HR about this. Who wins, the senior associate b*tching about a nonchristian religious holiday, or the associate. I think you are going to get reprimanded SO HARD
It’s really not a good idea to put yourself in the position of deciphering who is observant/religious enough to observe holidays. And HR won’t thank you for asking about this, either. In fact, this has nothing to do with HR. I mean, at most firms, HR is just paperwork.
I’m hoping that you are just really frustrated with the stress of your time-sensitive project and perhaps with the way this first-year expressed her unavailability. Please re-think your course of action when you’ve cooled down.
anon, I don’t agree with your words but I sympathize with you (I used to work for a Jewish partner and ended up working every Sunday because she took Sabbath every Saturday). I wouldn’t complain to HR or the partner. It sounds like the junior associate just needs to adjust her expectations about how much work needs to be done and recognize that if she doesn’t do it, someone else has to.
I would tell her that it’s OK to take off to observe her religious obligations but that you need her draft/work product by Sunday morning so you expect her to work on it starting at sundown on Saturday. If you are also religious, explain that you’ll be at church until just before her deadline but you’ll get going on it right afterwards (including, if true, that you’ll miss some Church-related activity yourself to accommodate her).
I’d email the partner and objectively explain the situation and the proposed schedule and cc the 1st year. “Partner, I just wanted to let you know that 1st Year is observing a religious holiday until sundown Saturday. She’ll have a first draft to me by 10am Sunday that I will turn around to you by 6pm Sunday.” Let the partner deal with HR.
Same combination of reactions here. When I was a mid-level associate in biglaw, I worked on a stressful case with a counsel who was Jewish and observed all the holidays. No problem. He also asked me to come in during a major Christian holiday because he knew I am not religious. Again, no problem.
But then there was the ONE time I told him I was planning to leave at 4 pm the next day (a Friday). I explained that I was singing a big solo part in a concert that evening and needed a few hours to shift focus and get ready. He was a total jerk about it. I stood my ground and things worked out just fine, but that conversation was definitely one of the low points of my time in biglaw. This was sacred for me. It was ironic that everybody on my team understood that except for the observant religious guy.
Um, a solo concert, while it may be important and exciting to you, is not the same level of importance as religious obligation. There are few things that always trump work and they are pretty much the following: religious holiday that you observe, marriage (yours), birth of a child (yours) and death (of a spouse/parent/child). If there was nothing that needed to be done at the office, then I agree the guy was being a jerk for not letting you go. But if there was something that needed to be done, its not unreasonable to make you stay. I don’t see the relevance of the fact that he was the one person in the office who took off regularly for religious commitments because its not the same thing at all.
I don’t think that a solo concert is the “same” as a religious holiday, because I don’t think they’re directly comparable. But I do think that if someone has been working hard for a long time to prepare for an important event that they are the center of (and which clearly will affect a number of other people if they cancel on), it has to be a veritable “you work for the CIA and the Iranian Embassy just got stormed”-type crisis for it to be reasonable for your job to ask you to cancel. (I’m assuming, of course, that this was all brought up well in advance, etc.)
It’s very common in biglaw to have to cancel important personal things other than the ones I mentioned. Its just the nature of the job. Also my understanding from her comment is that he was not asking her to cancel her performance but he was unwilling to let her leave early to “shift focus and get ready” for it. That’s very different than asking her to cancel her performance and, in my opinon, requires a much lower level of work “emergency.”
If Diva had just been venting about this guy being a jerk, I would have no problem with it (although again, this sort of thing is really common and is part of what you sign up for when you take the big paycheck). The part of the comment that I take issue with is implying that this guy’s behavior is somehow worse because he regularly takes off for Jewish holidays. I just don’t think equating a religious holiday with a concert is right and I don’t see the relevance of this guy’s religion or the number of holidays he has observed to his actions here.
It’s interesting to read the strong reactions my post provoked. Of course, there was no brief due that day, no deposition scheduled, no important meeting taking place– there was nothing that required attention at that very time (as opposed to, say, Saturday morning). There were a lot of moving parts but this was the type of case where that was ALWAYS the case. I had my ducks in a row and had given timely notice. People could call me on my cell if something urgent would come up. Trust me, there’s no need to educate me on the demands of big law.
And while I agree that death, religious obligations, health emergencies, and children are more important than my concert, I don’t think the comparison is called for. I didn’t ask this guy to work on Passover so I could prepare to sing a good concert, nor did I demand that he skip his daughter’s wedding. I do think that if you expect others to work around your obligations with some regularity, it leaves a bad taste if you are inflexible on the one occasion someone asks for a minor accommodation. And I should add that my observant colleagues were often the first to step up to help out their co-workers.
Quite honestly, I think reasonable and sporadic requests for flexibility should be granted without second-guessing the importance of the event. This is true especially in big law, where in some practices you’re essentially always on call and it’s difficult to maintain a semblance of a life outside of work. A marathon, an anniversary dinner, tickets to a major sports event, a daughter’s ballet performance, a night out with friends who are visiting from abroad, or a promising first date: any of those could be very important for some and not a huge deal for others.
I don’t think anyone was questioning the validity of your request. The pushback came when it seemed you were equating your request for time off with the 1st year in the op’s request for religious observation. Both deserving, but for very different reasons.
I was responding mostly to this:
“It’s very common in biglaw to have to cancel important personal things other than the ones I mentioned. Its just the nature of the job. Also my understanding from her comment is that he was not asking her to cancel her performance but he was unwilling to let her leave early to ‘shift focus and get ready’ for it. That’s very different than asking her to cancel her performance and, in my opinion, requires a much lower level of work ’emergency.'”
And also to this:
“The part of the comment that I take issue with is implying that this guy’s behavior is somehow worse because he regularly takes off for Jewish holidays. I just don’t think equating a religious holiday with a concert is right and I don’t see the relevance of this guy’s religion or the number of holidays he has observed to his actions here.”
Anyway, I think collegiality and graciousness go a long way. On further thought, my anecdote wasn’t helpful in making that point (quite the opposite). So I won’t defend it further.
It’s Purim this weekend, which is kind of a big holiday.
I’m not Jewish, but one of my friends brought over some hamantaschen she made. Where have these been all my life?!
We Jews do have the best food :)
I think the OP owes 1st year an entire batch of hamentaschen!
That’s frustrating that’s how they said it. Just say it’s a religious holiday. End. Comment. Then again, I have heard a thousand people say this at Christmas time.
You come off like a total b#tch “senior” associate.
How does name calling help anything?
Senior associates have a [email protected] job: they have a ton of responsibility and little-to-no authority. Are you really naive enough to think that the partner will blame the 1st year if it doesn’t get done? That 1st year has just left the senior associate up a creek without a paddle.
I think anon2 was just reacting, perhaps badly, but understandably, to a mature professional throwing such a hissy fit rant and crying about telling HR and Partner. And not everybody works in biglawlawland, so they don’t know how much responsibility a person in biglaw might have by their job title. Doesn’t make them naive.
I actually think name calling does help. Obviously, OP didnt know she was being a b*tch. She thought she was going to get a bunch of oh that’s awful! I think it is helpful to get some- hey you sound like a b*tch feedback, and its going to look badly for you if you go forward with this
I think a much better solution is to talk to the first year and say “I understand that you have to observe religious holidays, but in the future please let me know X days in advance so that we can plan ahead.” Because yes, it is annoying that she didn’t let you know, but a religious holiday is a religious holiday and I think it’s important to respect that.
On a related note, as a Jew, I can vouch that it can sometimes be awkward to have to announce this kind of time off. I don’t keep Shabbat (Friday-Saturday), but when I have to take off a weekday for other religious holidays, I sometimes get a slightly annoyed vibe from others about it. This is pretty ridiculous, since the calendar is obviously completely set around the Christian calendar, and no one would ever think twice about having Christmas/Easter off. As a junior associate in big law, I would feel very awkward about having to announce that I needed to take a day off a big deal/case/etc when I knew that everyone else would be working. So…yes, she should have told you earlier, but I absolutely think you should let it go this time and just ask her to give you more notice next time.
Not in law at all, so I don’t know the culture and I hope it doesn’t come off as glib, but do the non-Christians take the calendar-approved Christian holidays as well as those of their own religions? Or is it seen as a swap?
In my industry, any holiday that is not on the holiday calendar comes out of vacation/personal time if you observe it. We have generous PTO, so it’s not a big deal. I’m getting the vibe from you lawyer types that it’s different, at least in biglaw…
I think usually you have to take PTO, but keep in mind – this is a Saturday, so we’re actually talking about whether someone can take off a weekend day.
Most lawyers have plenty of “official” PTO, so the question of whether you have to use PTO is not an issue. The problem is asking for time away from the office/not working, not using the PTO. But yes, any time off for a religous holiday taken on a businss day would normally be recorded as vacation/PTO. As Em points out, the first year is asking for time off on a Saturday though, so that would not be recorded as PTO because officially nobody works Saturdays (ha!)
As to your question, about whether non-Christians take the Christian holidays, I’m sure it varies but I think generally everyone takes off on the official holidays if there is no urgent need to work. Why would I work on Christmas if I don’t have to, even if I don’t celebrate it? Just like why would I work on a weekend if I don’t have to? In my experience when there is work that has to be done on Christmas/Easter/Thanksgiving the people who don’t celebrate those holidays are usually called upon first, which seems completely fair to me.
Guys, it’s Purim. It’s not like it’s rosh hashanah or something. It’s practically like Halloween.
First Year needs to learn to speak up about these things well in advance. Fine to have religious standards, bu you have to communicate so other people aren’t stuck.
Also, you might be surprised to learn that the case law surrounding requests for religious accommodation in the workplace specifically do not delve into the depths of the person’s beliefs/how or how much they practice, but rather whether the belief is sincerely held.
Really, really hoping that this first year associate, or one of her friends, has seen this post, hit print, save as, and print screen and dropped it in a file. Unfortunately, I have a feeling she is going to need it.
I suspect she won’t see it until at least sundown this evening.
In other words, don’t be sheepish about your beliefs when representing them to your boss or you will get slammed for bringing them up.
I may be the odd person out, but if the first year has never observed the Sabbath before and chose this weekend to embrace it, knowing that there was an immense amount of work to do but knowing that she could get out of it by using the religious observance as an excuse, then I don’t think the senior associate is *that* out of line to be perturbed. I do think your reaction, OP is a bit over the top, and I don’t think that going to HR will do much, but I would question the first year and her commitment. Of course, if she has left every Friday in time for sundown and made the people on her team aware of it, then I don’t think the reaction is justified.
I’m saying this as someone else who works in biglaw, and would probably be equally annoyed if someone screwed me and did so in a way that left me with no recourse because it was based on a “trump” card, as someone phrased it earlier.
I actually think this is an important point. I am Christian, but of a persuasion that’s not so common in the region where I live and I learned early on that I had to own it when explaining it to my co-workers. My worst-ever week as an attorney was Holy Week a few years back, when I closed a deal on Good Friday, after being at church for 4 hours the night before (Maundy Thursday) and standing vigil with the reposed sacrament for an hour from 3-4 AM. The key is to let everyone know as early as possible, and without any sort of sheepishness or embarrassment. As a result, when I told the team that yes, we didn’t have the docs to the recording office yet but I absolutely had to leave to make it to church, people weren’t surprised, and we were prepared for a backup plan.
If you give the impression to people that you don’t care about your religious observance, then they’ll wonder why you’re taking the time off when everyone else has to work. It can be awkward, because religion is so personal, but it’s an important thing to learn (and is useful in other areas of one’s work and personal life).
I didn’t realize that it was a religious holiday, so thank you to everyone who pointed that out. I wouldn’t have reacted quite so negatively if associate had said, “It’s a religious holiday and I’m sorry I didn’t mention it sooner, but I have to observe,” rather than, “I’m not really religious and I’ve never taken off from work to observe the Sabbath before, but my mom is in town and she really wants me to observe so I’m out.”
I emailed partner to give him a head’s up that associate would not be available until Saturday evening due to a religious holiday. He asked why I didn’t tell him we were losing someone sooner, and I truthfully reported that associate told me at 4:30 that she was leaving. He called her and made her come back in. I wasn’t part of the conversation but I’m not all that surprised, especially if she told him she needed the time because of her mom. Fwiw, I’ve been told I need to work on plenty of Christmases and Easters, no one ever cared that they were religious holidays. Not sure of the legalities of that, but it’s pretty common.
It’s very cool of you to respond like this and take all the advice in the spirit it was intended.
Partner sounds terrible, though. He “made her come back in” — I’m just astounded by this. What a spiteful guy. I’m so glad I don’t work in BigLaw.
That is exactly the right way to handle it. I really like that you didn’t throw her under the bus in your first email for giving notice without much lead time. Good move.
How does one wear a maternity tunic? I have found a really pretty maternity tunic (expecting late August), but I just don’t understand what to wear with it. If I wear leggings, am I a victim of “leggings are not pants”? Or if I wear jeans/pants, does it look like I’m wearing pants with a dress (and no, I can’t pull that look off)? For the record, its kind of a lavender lace, sleeveless tunic — for the weekend, not work on zulilly. Also, I’m thinking ballet flats on the bottom, but I’m open to thoughts. Help?
I think a tunic + leggings is perfectly appropriate. Leggings are not pants really comes in when your butt is exposed. If the tunic is long enough to cover your butt, which most are, I think leggings are a great option for a cozy/casual look.
I’ve also worn tunics with skinny jeans and it definitely looks/fits differently than “dress with pants” which I also can’t pull off. Key if I want to wear a tunic with jeans is that the tunics are not to long – usually *just* below my butt.
If you’re due in August, you’re at the end of the first trimester now. You might have a bump, but your body is nowhere near the shape it’s going to be. Maternity clothes can be bewildering if you’ve always been in fairly decent shape. You don’t know yet if you’re going to get really big or not, carry high or low, and trying to deal with the coming figure is just strange. My advice is to just buy a couple months ahead–things that fit now and are extra roomy in the places you seem to be growing fastest.
Leggings are not pants mean your butt should be covered. tunics are perfect for leggings!
Just got back from a round of interviewing summer internship candidates. There was only one female candidate in the group. She is from he top 2-5 US b-schools . She was smart, good academics but her skirt suit was just so short (almost like shorts once she sat down, you could see mid thighs) and also had a very low cleavage top. I almost wanted to point her to this website, she is otherwise smart and I would recommend her for hire. Where are these young smart women getting their work clothing advice ? May be this blog could have some kind of campus outreach to get the word out.
I mean she is not that smart then. That’s not like oh she wore a red shirt and she really should have worn light blue or white. That is just no common sense. If you are in business school, law school, really over the age of 20, and you don’t know that then I don’t want you working for me. Same way I don’t want a dude who doesn’t show up to the interview with a tie.
I agree with you 100%. If you’re in a non-entry level point of life (interns, fresh undergrads, etc excluded) and you don’t know to cover yourself to the point your grandparent isn’t blushing, not a chance in hell.
Only caveat (and not saying that the example used falls into this category) is I think traditionally people tend to judge women a bit harsher than their male counterparts. Like people who clutch their pearls if hose aren’t worn in the summer. But that’s life.
Second this. My roommate just got into law school. She wears short/low cut stuff. Although our office is very casual and no one cares, I still took her shopping as a congrats present and bought her some suits etc. I never said anything but she hasn’t worn anything short since then.
There’s a good quote and I forget who said it and I am too lazy to google it but it’s like “the moment you use your sexuality to get ahead, you become completely replaceable.”
This is very harsh. I’m glad you were fortunate enough to know professional women and see how they dressed, but I grew up literally never seeing professionals. I only knew working class people who wore uniforms, jeans, and Sunday church clothes. It was very difficult for me to learn the little rules of looking professional.
I didn’t know a single professional woman. Neither of my parents have college degrees, and I am the first ever to have a higher ed degree. I made ton of dressing mistakes when I first started (I shudder to think of the shoes I wore, and my suit had shoulder pads (and it was not the 80s) But I knew that skirts go to your knee or very close, and you dont show your chest off in an interview. It took me a long time to learn the little rules – but we are talking about the big ones.
Well the important thing is that you knew, kiley. That is certainly the standard by which everyone should be judged. You knew the “big rules,” so clearly everyone else should too.
Are you seriously saying that adult women don’t know not to have cleavage and a short skirt to the interview? Hell yes that should be the standard by which everyone should and obviously is judged.
In her defense (and I think the cleavage is indefensible), some of the skirt suits this season are ridiculously short (I am looking at you, BR). There are all sorts of folks posting on their sites saying “I don’t normally get Talls, but I had to bc this skirt was so short.” So, if folks are young/shopping now, they might not know that what stores put together as appropriate suits, are not appropriate…..
If she was interviewing for her first job out of college, sure. But if she’s a current student at a top US business school, then she had enough prior work experience to know what is, and isn’t, appropriate business/interview attire. And she clearly decided that those rules don’t apply to her.
I was trying to give her benefit of doubt and not be too harsh for her dress. She was interviewing for an intern position after all (but MBA interns). She was the only female candidate we had, spoke with good confidence and got most of my technical questions correct (same ones I asked others). I wanted to judge her as objectively as possible and did recommend her for a hire based purely on day to day job skill set. But the interviewers did not think of her so well so she is off to the “may be” file.
Whether she gets the position or not, you could reach out to her. Once the dust settles from offers, she’d probably be grateful for a networking move from you, and you could mention the wardrobe in ensuing conversation. Make sure you know the other reasons she’s not favored by the other interviewers in case she seems to be thinking the clothes are the only reason. (But if they’re all men, you might want to make sure their brains didn’t turn off when they saw curves. It happens.)
I do not think its a good idea to reach out to a rejected candidate and tell her about her clothing choices. I think this would be extremely awkward at best, and potentially really bad for the company at worst
Well, yeah, if you called her up and said “what were you wearing?!” that’d be a mistake. But if you have reached out as a networking contact and at some point in the future, when you’re not just an interviewer from the interview she failed, I don’t see why you couldn’t bring it up. I know that when I’ve seen people I’ve known from the other side of the interview table at a work social event, they’ve often been glad to connect. But the way you put it, no, it would not be a good idea.
I agree with you, saacnmama. That would be a kind thing to do — might be embarrassing, but I don’t know how it wouldn’t help her, ultimately.
They are getting clothing advice from the sales-teens at BR who also don’t know any better. I’d overlook this at the interview stage and address it if it becomes an issue after she’s hired.
This is a really good point, k-padi. And compassionate.
I agree. I also think it’s possible that she doesn’t know about checking skirt lengths by sitting down, or bending over/stretching moving around to see whether or not a shirt shifts position. I’ve bought more than one skirt that was knee-length when I was standing up, but if I was walking with long strides or sitting, it suddenly became very short; I’ve also bought shirts that I thought didn’t show a lot/any cleavage until I had been wearing them a few hours (or washed them) and they’d lost the shape they had on the hanger.
It freaks me out when judges pick up the phone. I never know what to say!
Good afternoon your honor! (for some reason I always am nearly yelling)
How about “Hello, this is Bonnie and I am calling for XYZ reason.”
Theoretically I know what to say; I just get really flustered. It becomes even more awkward when the judge does not know his fax # or email address. It would be so much simpler if all courts had efile.
I get what you were saying. Your comment just made me realize I always do this. I yell like an old person talking into a cell phone for the first time.
Maybe because if you are judge at a court that doesn’t e-file, I subconsciously think you are old? idk. I would never do that in chambers or court. Totally a phone thing.
Why are you asking for fax or email address? I’d think those are easy to find elsewhere; even if judge knows them, why take up his/her time?
Email addresses aren’t publicly available for judges in the courts where I practice. Given that you aren’t a lawyer and thus don’t have extensive (if any) personal experience in this area, I’m not sure why you felt the need to comment for the purpose of criticizing OP, based on your (incorrect, at least in my experience) assumptions.
I don’t have experience with judges, but I have worked with the kind of internatiinally-known globe-trotting endowed chairs who don’t know their own email address. I think they both were able to get it out eventually, but they acted like they didn’t know it because A) it was far from foremost in their minds and B) they figured that the person who wanted something should be the one to sully themselves with such details. I you’re telling me that no one in your firm could provide you with the email address of a judge who said “email that to me”, I’ll believe you, but it’s one of the order complexities of the legal field I’ve heard here. If that’s such rare info, I would expect firms to keep lists of it. But you’re right, it’s not my field.
*if you’re telling me
As you said, you have no experience with judges. I’m not sure why you’re trying to find fault with my actions when you’re completely guessing about a field you know nothing about.
Because they aren’t easy to find and the matter could not wait until Monday.
Judge here. You can never go wrong with an honorific, but also “hello” is just fine. I’m guilty of not knowing my email address and not knowing my fax (or phone number, honestly). For non-lawyers, the issue isn’t that we’re old and out of touch with modern technology (I’m actually neither). Rather, it’s that there really are very few reasons counsel or pro se parties ought to be contacting ME directly outside of the proceeding. The only person who has my direct line is my spouse and my child’s teacher.
One of my judges is 91 years old. I would totally freak out if he picked up the phone!
What’s an appropriate gift for my best friend’s BF? I’m seeing my friend after 2 years and meeting the BF for the first time since they’re in the US and I’m in the UK. I feel I ought to get him something too but I’ve no idea what. If I ask my friend for ideas, I know she’ll tell me not to bother.
That’s a toughie unless you get him a gift card, which could be weird and awkward. What if instead of something for her and something for him you bot something for her and something for both of them (like a bottle of wine). That way you’re still making the gesture that you thought to include him.
Are you visiting them, or vice versa? If you are visiting them and just want something small, I’d bring chocolate. UK chocolate is SO much better than North American chocolate.
I would bring a small gift uniquely UK, i.e. tea, biscuits, Cadbury, crisps.
Those have the added bonus of being for both. You could also bring a serving dish/accessory that goes along with what you’re bringing.
Just bought a house and need to fill it with furniture. We don’t want to just blow through money, but we’d like stuff that will last. Any recommendations for brands or sources for living/ dining/ bedroom furniture that has stood up to life? We’re in NY if it matters.
Honestly, Ikea. They have some higher-end stuff that I’ve had for years and doesn’t look college dorm-y.
+1 for IKEA. A lot of our furniture is IKEA and has lasted many years and several moves. If you curate carefully, it doesn’t have to look like a Scandinavian catalogue.
I think IKEA is good for some stuff but not for ALL stuff. Their wood pieces are mostly crap, in my experience anyway, but they have some nice extras: metal bed frames, lamps, window shades, etc. If you’re planning to stay in one place a while, I will say they are better for that – i.e., their composite wood furniture is less likely to fall apart on you if you don’t have to take it apart.
Since you’re in NY, my recommendations for made-to-last furniture are (in no particular order): Gothic Cabinet Craft (actual wood furniture!), Housing Works Thrift Shops (hit or miss but can turn up gems, my favorites are 17th st. and the UWS location), the ABC Warehouse in the Bronx (or Jersey) – esp. during annual sale, random flea markets and thrift stores for real wood furniture, Craig’s List (really!), random garage sales and places upstate (I got a bunch an awesome antique hutch and dresser for $300 total in Syracuse last summer), outlets (tanger riverhead for WS/Pottery Barn/West Elm).
I second the Gothic Cabinet suggestion!
If you like vintage, Furnish Green is great! You have to check in on their website often, because new items get posted all the time, but I got a cool boomerang coffee table and a midcentury dresser there, both better quality than anything new would be at twice the price.
Room & Board is my favorite. My sofa has handled well.
switching practice areas?
Hello ladies, long time reader, 1st time poster here. Has anyone made the switch from litigation to corporate? If so, I’d love to hear any thoughts on the switch/why you switched/etc. FWIW, I practice IP (mostly patent) litigation now and thinking of going to an IP transactions/corporate group.
Curious to hear what y’all have to say about this. I’ve been practicing litigation for almost 3 years, and I worry that I’ve missed my window to make a career switch. Totally willing to start over as a first year transactional associate, if that’s what it takes!
You don’t have to start from scratch, just reach out and start with low hanging fruit. Ask for work to help you understand your litigation.
Ooh, I would also love to hear more about this! (currently a litigator, would like to switch to more transactional practice).
Very interested as well! Currently a first-year litigation associate, but I want to get my hands on some transactional work and make an informed choice about where I’d like to land more permanently. For context, I’m the only first year at a medium-size firm, and wasn’t hired into a practice group or anything; I currently do a huge mix of things, primarily litigation, and my office is on the floor with the litigators, so I sometimes get nervous about being “stuck.”
I’m in corporate and interview people. We have brought someone on with this background, but they took a major hit with regard to seniority (and money). Contract drafting is nothing like drafting pleadings or briefs, and it’s a skill that takes a lot of time to learn.
Do you work in a firm that does both IP litigation and IP corporate? If so, could you reach out and let people in the corporate group know you are interested in assignments? Then if you do well they will presumably reward you with more and more work until you are doing so much work for that group you can approach the management about switching. That’s how I’ve seen people transition within my firm. Also, if you have a mentor that you trust maybe reach out to that person and let them know you have a desire to do more corporate work.
My firm has hired big law patent lit associates to do patent pros. They typically apply when they realize they won’t make partner there or they’re sick of the lifestyle. By the way, I think we’re hiring but only EE/computer backgrounds (like every other IP firm.) Thomas Horstemeyer LLP.
Thanks, all, for your comments. Lots of things for me to mull over this weekend.
Since it’s the open thread, I’ll provide a real update! So I started my new in-house position 2 weeks ago, and it has been pretty amazing. It’s no litigation at all, other than keeping an eye on outside counsel on the very, very few claims we have pending (they’re already cranky because one of my first questions was “Why does your report say discovery is still ongoing, and at the same time, you are waiting for a decision on an MSJ? There’s no trial date so….hmmm….”). Anyway…I’ve been reviewing / redlining contract like mad, and it is really, really fun!
I’ve done this work before, but when I was at a law firm it was probably only 25% of my time, and the rest was litigation. I also grew up in this industry, so I definately speak the language, which is a huge advantage. I’ve had a few instances where I wasn’t quite sure what the answer was, like on projects I don’t really know anything about and I was asked for a quick contract review or to provide a form, but I’ve been able to ask GC and she has been great and helpful. So far, all of the language I have drafted from scratch has gone over very well, and been used without changes!! (Amazing…especially considering that the partner I worked with last used to call my work things like “horribly disappointing” and then do nothing but change creative / storyline elements in my work.) I’ve made a few missteps, but GC has been really helpful about it as it is basically due to my newness to the company and not knowing their standard operating procedure perfectly yet.
I have an office, for now, but it isn’t permanant, I’m just sitting in a space until that much more senior position is filled. Then I’ll be bumped out to a workstation in an open area, but it actually has a really beautiful view and will be totally fine. I won’t be on courtcalls, and they provide rooms for us if we have to do an extended conference call. They encourage headphones if you want them, so I’ll invest in a nice pair when the time comes. I have to convince myself that not having a private office is not a downgrade, it’s something that comes with being in-house counsel with an industry that doesn’t really do private space. Totally fine, the space will be right outside where my door is now, and it is pretty quiet over there.
What else…it comes with pretty great health benefits, and actual retirment accounts other than just a plain 401k (profit sharing, stuff like that) and the holidays are real. The office was actually closed Monday and I didn’t hear a peep from anyone. I have a vacation next week that I’ve had planned for months, and when I said “oh don’t worry, I’ll have my laptop with me” one of the other employees looked horrified and told me not to. I will anyway, for my own piece of mind, but if I don’t open it that’s fine.
It seems amazing, and I think it will be as long as I can keep my “imposter syndrome” in check. I was knocked down pretty badly at my last place, and my confidence is going to take some time to come back. I’m doing a lot of “don’t panic. You know this.” Once I really dig in I’m ok, and my seniors don’t seem to mind answering all of my questions (yet). So far so good!!
Wonderful news, So Cal. Very encouraging – thanks for the update!
Thanks for the update, SoCal! Enjoy the in-house life.
Any ideas on how to deal with an annoying male coworker who comes into your office to chat about nothing in particular, asks dumb questions about your stuff, digs through your inbox for conversation topics, and reads off your wall calendar, asking you whether you have done the tasks you have calendared for the day? I am about ready to take my calendar off the wall so he can’t read off of it. It’s like dealing with a child.
Wait, he’s reading your emails?
Inbox for papers. Just rifling through my mail.
Shut the door. If that’s Not Done in your office culture say, “I’m sorry, Joe, I have a lot to get done today. Is there something work-related you need? If not, I need to get back to work.”
Kind of sounds like he has a crush on you, almost…
It does sound like a crush, totally in appropriately expressed. Rifling through someone’s mailbox, physical or virtual, does not sound ok to me. You can ask him clearly, firmly, what it is he needs & send him packing when he doesn’t have a good answer or you can ask if be wants to get coffee later, but why put up with him bugging you in this way?
I agree. This guy’s behavior seems super creepy to me, and I think you will need to be pretty direct with him to get him to stop. MOA’s language above is good. If, after that, he still goes through your inbox, I would say “Please stop going through my things.” And I would move the calendar to somewhere where he can’t see it as easily. If he doesn’t stop, go to HR.
I got married about a year and a half ago. At my wedding, two of my bridesmaids who didn’t previously know each other (one was my friend from college, the other from grad school) really hit it off. At the time, I was obviously really happy that everyone was getting along so well. But they seem to have stayed in touch since the wedding and, at least on facebook, appear to be BFFs (liking every status and picture, posting on each other’s walls a million times a day) and they are making plans to visit each other (they live a plane ride apart). Of course I expect my friends to have other friends but I can’t help but feel a little sad that it now seems like they are now closer friends with each other than either of them ever was with me. I’m also hurt by the fact that they are spending lots of money to visit each other and neither of them has ever visited me (I also live a plane ride away from both of them). We’re all pretty young & neither of them is especially well off, so I never felt slighted by the lack of a visit before but now I am feeling hurt that they want to visit each other and not me. My husband thinks I’m blowing this out of proportion and acting like a middle school girl (although he said it more politely). Am I totally crazy to feel hurt in this situation? I also think part of why I’m feeling so sad is that I’m not a person who has a lot of close friends to begin with, and my crazy hours at my job (and geographic distance from all my close friends) has made it hard to keep in touch with people. I work around 60-70 hours a week on average, and spend pretty much all my non-work time with my husband or on my own (reading, etc). I’m naturally an introvert so I’m very content spending time on my own & with my husband but sometimes I feel sad about the fact that I really have no close friends.
Maybe they feel less comfortable about coming to stay with you because you are married?
If they’re both single ladies, this is a very good possibility. Happened with two of my best friends (two of us are pretty much BFFs, two of us are tight but not as much as we used to be before she got married, and married girl and the other girl don’t really speak anymore). It got weird for a while and sometimes that happens when one gets married. I’m not saying that’s right, but I know I have to fight the assumption that she doesn’t want to hang out anymore because she has Husband duties (or she’s going to bring him along), when that’s not really the case.
I think this is spot-on. They probably don’t want to come and visit you because you are married. I am single, and when a lot of my friends started getting married a few years ago, I subconsciously pulled back from those friendships. I just didn’t call them because I assumed they would rather being doing “husband stuff” instead of the other things (like getting pedicures, having long afternoon lunches) that we used to enjoy. This wasn’t really that big of an adjustment for me, because during the engagement period, each of the girls spent a substantial amount of their free time doing “wedding stuff.” So gradually, over the course of a year or so, we fell out of touch for some of the day-to-day activities. By the time the weddings rolled around, I had found other people to do that casual weekend stuff with me. Now, a few years later, everything is sort of back to normal. I realize that I was making the assumption that being married was this great untouchable transition to adulthood, and that my married friends would find the stuff that we did before sort of silly. It isn’t really. Just reach out, and let them know that you are still the same person, the same kind of friend that you were before you got married, and that you want to spend time with them.
“My husband thinks I’m blowing this out of proportion and acting like a middle school girl.”
You are. You admit that you are an introvert, not good at keeping in touch with other people, work crazy hours and prefer to spend you free time with your husband or on your own. Yet you expect your friends to travel to visit you? You are hurt that they are spending money to see each other. Did you worry this much about their spending and expenses when they spent money to be in your wedding? I was reading a story today about a Hollywood actress chastising the media for portraying actresses being unable to be happy for each others’ success. She said she couldn’t understand where the media gets these stereotypes, but now I see that there is some basis to them. I will be chastised by others on the hive for being too harsh on you but I think it is wrong to feel hurt by your friends’ happiness. It just is.
I see what you’re saying but I do think it is harsh – I am not feeling hurt by their happiness so much as I am by what I perceive (maybe unreasonably) as their leaving me out or choosing each other over me. I think I do a good job of always being happy for my friends’ successes, even when it is hard for me (for example when a friend got a great new job when I was long-term unemployed). And lets be real, it CAN be hard to be completely happy in that situation. You can be happy for your friend and also sad/frustrated/angry that the same thing isn’t happening for you. It doesn’t make you a bad person, it just makes you human. Another very good friend (not one of the 2 mentioned above) went through a bad breakup right before my wedding. I know deep down she was happy for me but I also know it was hard for her to be “love love love” all the time & she probably wasn’t as enthusiastic about wedding-related events as she otherwise would have been. I don’t hold it against her. Its really unfair to blame me for the root of all the media’s stereotypes about women hating other women.
Fair enough. You are sensitive to the fact that even in good friendships there may be some envy or wistfulness. I am not blaming you as the root of media’s stereotypes. But are you sure that by going to see each other, they are deliberately leaving you out or choosing each other *over* you? Why don’t you just say you’d like to join them on the trip? As other people have said perhaps they didn’t ask you because you are newly married or they figured you wouldn’t want to take a trip without your husband. But if you asked, they will probably happy to have you join, don’t you think?
I’m also an introvert and very much like you. The rational part of my brain realizes that part of it is me – because I’m an introvert, my friendships usually don’t have much social networking evidence. And that’s because that isn’t me – I’m not showy, I’m not super social, and so there won’t be tons of photos or lots of comments or crazy group visits. Sometimes, I have to woman-up and say “hey, that looks like so much fun! let’s go do [similar activity] this weekend!” even though it isn’t the easiest thing for me to do. And sometimes I have to remind myself that even though that looks fun on facebook, I would probably not be having the same great time / I actually do prefer watching tv at home.
That being said, knowing that I may have contributed to the situation doesn’t mean I don’t feel hurt. Mope or have wine or whatever and indulge yourself for a while and then come up with ways to either make yourself more included or be more aware so that you don’t feel quite so hurt.
This. I’ve actually been trying to be more active (what my mind also reads as “showy”) on social media, just to help maintain things. And every time I wish that someone had invited me to something, I try to pause and remember the last time I invited THEM to something… Sometimes it’s been a while! I don’t need to be in constant contact to feel close, but I know that others could misinterpret my relative silence as a lack of interest, or might just not think of me the next time a holiday weekend comes up — so reminding myself to take initiative has made worlds of difference.
You don’t own either of your friend because you met them first, so just focus on your friendship with each of them rather than worrying about what they do together.
My aunt stopped talking to my mom because Aunt introduced Mom to a friend of hers and they hit it off. Mom and Friend had similar backgrounds and interests, so spent more time together. I thought Aunt’s jealous reaction was strange and insecure.
Haven’t visited you? Didn’t you say they traveled–and bought dresses and presents and other things–to be in your wedding?
I agree with other posters that they might feel more inhibited inviting themselves to your husbands house than to visit another single person.
One thing I’ve realized as college gets further in the rearview mirror is that even though I wish I had been better at maintaining relationships all along, those people who were once good friends are still there for me. I’ve started making totally obvious, not-suave, moves to stay in touch and those have been very well
Have you invited them to come visit you? I would imagine many of their conversations go something like this . . .
“Hey, we should get together some time!” “Yes, definitely! What weekend works for you?” “XYZ, 2013” “Okay, great! Let’s do it.”
If you want them to come visit, suggest a time that works for you and go from there. I have friends who I don’t talk to regularly, but when I want to see them, I propose it. If you want to see them, propose something instead of waiting around being feeling sorry for yourself about it.
Just to clarify, I’ve invited them to visit me many times and let them know they always have a place to stay with me if they want to come to my city, which is considered something of a tourist destination. They’ve said they would love to, but they’ve never followed through. I don’t know how to keep bring it up again without seeming like I’m begging them to visit. When I was saying I’m sad they haven’t visited me, I was referring to the 5+ years that I’ve lived long distance from both of them, not just the last 1.5 years when I’ve been married. I’ve also visited both of them.
Why do you think they are not following through? Do you think they might follow through if you gave them a mini-itinerary for the weekend instead of just an open invite? That’s an honest question, I am not trying to snark. I know I have had more success getting my friends to come visit if I can say, are you free XYZ weekend, there is a great show at ABC Musuem that weekend. Or something like that. It may just be that they aren’t as comfortable visiting a married house as they would be a single house. I am not sure what you can do about that other than invite them on a weekend when your husband is out of town.
I’ve just read Susanedna’s comments on her company’s IT block on the other thread and wanted to do a friendly warning for those who may need it that pretty much ALL internet use on corporate IT systems is potentially subject to monitoring, particularly if the employers involved are regulated entities like banks, money managers etc.
I have been at big banks for most of my career and pretty much never do any kind of personal stuff on the work computer or BB, after receiving a really chilling email a few years ago, sent firm-wide to all MDs, something along the lines of : “Dear supervising managers, please note that we have barred the following websites […] in response to concerns regarding abuse of internet privileges by our staff. Please also note that the following of your staff […about 200 names and the units they work in …] have been detected to be active for an average of [x] hours a week or more on the barred sites. Regards, IT security”.
This email went on to have a really long half-life and I think it did do damage to the names on it – for months after, I would deal with someone new internally and would often think “oh familiar name, ah yes, it was on that list about people who spends hours on those sites”. Am pretty sure it was the same for other recipients.
Since then, the scrutiny and technology for undertaking it has only increased, so do be careful you don’t inadvertently put yourself in a situation where you may be made to feel embarrassed at work about something as innocent as participating on this site (“oh she’s the woman who spends hours on some website for overachieving chicks …”)
Anonforthis, I’ve been in banking for years to (in management but not MD level) and in my experience the sites are just blocked. They may be tracking usage but most sites are just blocked and have been for 5+ years. I can’t get to [this site] at all, though I can get to capitolhillstyle, so there isn’t much rhyme or reason. My own feeling is that I know my direct-reports (and my male boss) look at ESPN, WSJ, NYTimes etc., but it is similar to walking down the hall for a cup of coffee and talking to a co-worker – it’s a break from the day. If there’s a performance issue, we address that.
And when I spend a good part of the day on boring required conference calls, looking at NYTimes in the background doesn’t detact from my participation in the call. I am very careful about what I look at though.
The issue isn’t with browsing news websites, although I do think ESPN is barred or controlled by many banks as part of an attempt to reduce the distraction of sports betting by its trading-floor employees.
The potential issue is that we do have people posting here on their savings habits, household income, problems with bosses and loved ones, pregnancies, LGPs and so on. If they are under the impression that they are doing so anonymously, the reality is that they probably are not. At least not to their employer’s key-word autobot, if they work in a regulated industry with a spotty history of indiscreet electronic communication.
Does it trump performance ? Of course not. Is it the potential cause of an embarrassing suggestion by your boss to exercise better judgement ? Yes – and I know this because I was just as embarrassed at having to deliver the suggestion.
How much is appropriate to tip your hair stylist (in Chicago, if that matters)? The hair cut costs $75 (only a cut, no highlights or anything). Percentage? Set value?
I always tip 20%.
BR has a lovely light tan suit (like I have been searching for for aaages) featured in some of their new ads, but when you click through, they direct you to a gray suit that’s completely different. Sigh sigh sigh.
On a related note, how many sizes down can you get skirt suits tailored? I weighed a little more and had absolutely no idea how suits should fit when I bought my first one, so now I have a jacket and skirt that are both four sizes too big. They’re also in a non-standard color that probably would work better if I lived farther south, so I don’t want to spend too much trying to salvage.
Pencil skirts are dead easy to tailor. I’ve had a couple tailored down 2 sizes, but I reckon you could easily do more.
Any suggestions on shapewear? I’m looking for something providing smoothing from stomach to thigh, preferably something with boy short style bottoms (rather than the cut bottoms or skirt, which I find tends to be uncomfortable). I also don’t want something too long so that it is versatile with all different dresses.
No longer waiting for a proposal
I need some retirement planning/investment advice. My boss informed me that I am now eligible to be included in the firm’s IRA. He told me it is fully vested, so there’s no risk in losing it if I leave the firm, which I doubt I will ever do. We each get to select our own investments, and the firm will match up to 3% of my salary. I don’t know a lot about finances, how much I should invest, or how risky my investments should be. I generally hate risk, but I’m young and I figure now may be the time to take more risks since I don’t have many responsibilities. For background, I am 27, just graduated law school, and make under $50K. I have no student loans or debt of any kind, but I’m still living at home and I’ll need a new car in 1-3 years. How much should I put away every week/month? How risky should I be?
First: You should absolutely maximize the amount that your firm will match, so if they match up to 3%, you should contribute 3%. That is basically a 3% raise – free money – that they’re offering to you. Take it.
Second: Risk is totally your call. You’re going to have to live with it. The stock market will always be volatile, and like you, I am risk-averse, but I chose a group of medium-to-high risk funds to invest through my employer in, because the money needs to stay in there for a good 40 years.
Third: check this out and see if it helps you decide how to set up your budget: http://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2012/01/13/the-shockingly-simple-math-behind-early-retirement/
To No Longer Waiting for Proposal:
The general wisdom is that you should invest in more risky investments the younger you are and as you get toward retirement get more conservative. So take more risk that you would be comfortable with normally. As Gold Ribbons said, definitely put at least 3% in to get the match. Then look at the rest of your income, and work to build an emergency/car fund. Since you’re living at home and don’t pay rent, I’d at least start saving as much as you would be paying for rent, utilities, insurance, cable, internet. Then once you have enough for a car plus an emergency (assuming you’re not moving out soon) then you can start investing. If you’re going to move out, save for the car then build a 6-12 month emergency fund. After the emergency fund, then max out the tax free IRA contribution at work first, then if you can contribute more, you’d look at Roth IRA or some other vehicle.
Until then, start persuing cnn/money’s web site or reading Fortune to find out more about IRAs, Roth IRAs, mutual funds etc.
No longer waiting for a proposal
Thanks! I browse those websites and I was thinking about subscribing to a financial magazine. Is Fortune a good one for someone in my situation?
Fortune is good, but has a lot of general business articles too, which are helpful for general economic trends. For just personal investing/wealth, Money is my favorite.
Agree that you should definitely do the full 3% for matching purposes.
We also get Money magazine at our house, and I think it does a nice job for people in all salary ranges laying out options and investment information.
The most important thing is to get good advice. DH and I got connected to our parent’s financial advisors, which has been extremely helpful and reassuring.
I’ve been reading a fair amount about all of this lately. I recommend checking out some books to learn about the basics and see what resonates with you about risk. Here are some suggestions:
I Will Teach You To Be Rich by Ramit Sethi
The only Investment Guide You’ll Ever Need by Andrew Tobias
Basically any book by Suze Orman
Also, check out Suze Orman’s show. You can download free video podcasts of it from iTunes. I’ve found it helpful because people will call in who are in situations similar to mine and she walks them through how to deal with it.
The bottom line recommendations from what I’ve read are to absolutely contribute to your employer’s plan at least up to the matching amount because otherwise you are passing up free money. Also, open a Roth IRA on your own and max that out, if possible. The advice seems to be that the younger you are, the riskier you can be, but I think its worth taking into consideration how comfortable you are with risk. Take some, but don’t take so much that you are freaked out about it.
I can’t write a lot on my iPhone but my dad made me wear my new boots and new jeggings and Henry immediately grabbed at my tuchus. I was in shock, right in Zaro’s! I do not know what he was told but I am not so desperate to allow ANYONE to grab at me, especially if I am not a girlfriend. Myrna thought he was cute. Gross!
Happy Thoughts Please!
After 18 months of trying, I had two (very faint but there!) positive pregnancy tests yesterday and today. Just hoping the hive can send some good vibes my way and prayers if you say them! I’m too nervous to tell anyone but DH in real life.
Sending all kinds of good vibes your way!
Good pregnancy vibes sent!!! Keep us posted.
A line is a line! Congratulations mama!
In desperate need of internet dating advice. I’m 52 and have been divorced for a few years, but haven’t really dated. So I just signed up on Match.com, and I received several emails right away, but most are not people I’d be interested in. I have no interest in men who are “currently separated,” and guys in their 50s who post shirtless pictures just seem strange to me (even though he actually looked pretty good, but still). And then there are the blatant grammatical errors in their profiles. But I hate not to respond to their emails. Is there some nice way to respond, and just let them know, thanks but no thanks? Any tips? Or am I being too picky. I don’t know, this was probably just a bad idea.
I did match for a long time and felt like you initially, but i’d suggest only responding to people you’re interested in. I found men write to tons of women and aren’t waiting for your response, and it’s just too time consuming. You’ll find it easier to deal with if you ignore the ones you aren’t into like spam. And have fun! I met my Mr. Big on match :)
So if a guy “winks” at you, would an appropriate response be to “favorite” him? Man, this is complicated. There needs to be a manual.
No no! Only favorite or wink back if you like him too. I used to just wink back if I was interested.
Sorry, I may have misunderstood your question, you could favorite if you like him too but I think a wink back is more common.
Yes, this one I liked. I liked his picture and favorited him, probably did that wrong. I’ll know better next time.
Oh, and if a guy lists 50 Shades of Gray as one of his favorite books, is that code that he’s into kinky stuff? I’ve never read it, but they do play recordings of Morgan Freeman and Gilbert Godfried reading excerpts from it on the morning radio show I listen to, and although it sounds hilarious, I don’t think it’s something I would be interested in.
My guess would be most likely. :)
Each person has their own approach, but here are some suggestions:
– write on your profile that you are not interested in hearing from men who are “just separated”
– write on your profile that you only want to hear from (or will only reply to) men who can produce a literate message
– reply only to messages that are sensible and/or literate and/or interesting
– If it’s a decent message but you’re not interested, reply with “Thanks for your message. Your profile doesn’t really fit what I’m looking for, but I wish you the best of luck. Regards, [YourMatchName]”
As for winks/favouriting, I return a wink for a wink IF I am interested (the equivalent of saying “sure, feel free to send me a message”, in my opinion) and I favourite if I come across a profile that makes me think I’d like to know more about this man, for example in my Daily 6 or just scanning profiles. I don’t know how their algorithms work but I’m pretty sure the more I marked profiles I liked, the fewer “no way!” matches were suggested in my Daily 6.
I also think the more your personal “voice” comes across in your profile, the more likely you are to hear from men who you might get on with.
And finally, don’t be upset when a man you were messaging with – and thought you had a good conversation going on with – just disappears without a word. It’s frustrating but pretty common.
Good luck, and be safe!
I agree with the advice to be straight up about putting in your profile what you do and do not want. That way, if someone who is “just separated” contacts you without offering any explanation as to why you should let that slide for him, then you’ll know he didn’t read your profile or didn’t care about what you said. I definitely don’t think that requires a response.
I found that it was easier to ignore messages from people I was absolutely not interested in, especially the completely illiterate ones or the ones that just said “hi” or “you’re cute.” I had tried responding with a polite line about not being interested, but that sparked more emails from that person. Ignoring the messages worked best because that person probably didn’t even remember messaging me. If they are serious, I think they’ll tend to write you a more careful message which responds to something you’ve mentioned in your profile.