Weekly News Update

This post may contain affiliate links and Corporette® may earn commissions for purchases made through links in this post. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

A white square with the text "weekly news update" and a square pink border
  • Glamour shared some of the best red carpet looks from Cannes.
  • The Wall Street Journal looked at how Old Navy's size-inclusivity efforts have left it with a shortage of middle sizes.
  • Harvard Business Review provided tips for people who get anxious about networking.
  • CNBC reported that a growing number of large companies, including Starbucks and Citigroup, have committed to providing travel benefits for employees' abortion services.
  • Above the Law noted that a Biglaw firm will be the first to allow associates to count up to 25 hours of leadership, training, advocacy and development work tied to environmental sustainability toward their billable hour targets.
  • Vox's The Goods stated that “anything that's vaguely popular online must be … reduced to a bundle of marketable vibes with a kitschy label.”
  • The New York Times published an op-ed that summarized some interesting studies on money and happiness — both separately and together. (One takeaway: Go out and enjoy nature this weekend!)
  • Wine Enthusiast explained why non-alcoholic drinks are having a moment.
  • Book Riot pondered, “What makes a good Mr. Darcy?”
  • Fortune listed several ways to donate to help families of the victims of the Buffalo and Uvalde, TX, mass shootings; their communities; and related organizations.

On CorporetteMoms Recently…

Did we miss anything? Add 'em here, or send them to news@corporette.com. Thank you! Also: Are you a mom or mom-to-be? Don’t miss this week’s news update at CorporetteMoms

Feeling social? You can check us out on Facebook or Instagram, or through BloglovinPinterest, or Twitter

7 Comments

  1. Interesting WSJ article about Old Navy. I concur with it. I’m a 12/14 and have had a very hard time finding anything at Old Navy since they made the switch. Everything in the middle (say, 8-14) is consistently out.

    1. It is completely baffling to me how companies are still unable to predict demand for various sizes. Don’t they keep track of what sells, and how quickly? Clearly they don’t, because my shoe and clothing sizes always sell out far earlier than other sizes.

    2. It also seems like they have a lot less in petite sizes. I’ve been fairly loyal to BR/ON/Gap because they had been so good for carrying petites, but they’ve really decreased the number of styles that come in petites and even those that do will just have one or two boring colors in limited sizes that are often out of stock (I’m a 6/8/10, so right in the middle). I actually think Old Navy does a better job of this than their other brands, but I buy a lot less because they have so few things in my size (and it’s all high waisted, which I hate).

    3. I’m a small/medium or a 4/6 (occasionally) and my local
      Old Navy (downtown, big city) has NOTHING in my size. The only sizes in stock seem to be XS or 2XL and larger. No small, mediums, larges, or even XLs. It’s infuriating

      1. I’m sorry to hear that the mid-sizes at ON are getting harder to find and I get that it’s infuriating. However, as a plus size shopper, not being able to just walk in and find my size on the rack at 95% of stores has been my lifelong reality. With the majority of women being 12/14+ now, the fact that there’s basically only 1 major chain selling plus in-store is outrageous. The mid-sizes can shop in almost any store. The big girls can’t.

  2. I am an XS and am irritated, however, by how often brands start with just small. Also, the move to size inclusivity in medical offices usually means I am swimming in medical gowns and much more exposed than I should be! Size inclusivity is great. Just remember the full range of sizes and order the right amount of each.

Comments are closed.