This post may contain affiliate links and Corporette® may earn commissions for purchases made through links in this post. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Our daily TPS reports suggest one piece of work-appropriate attire in a range of prices.
Sales of note for 10.10.24
- Nordstrom – Extra 25% off clearance (through 10/14); there's a lot from reader favorites like Boss, FARM Rio, Marc Fisher LTD, AGL, and more. Plus: free 2-day shipping, and cardmembers earn 6x points per dollar (3X the points on beauty).
- Ann Taylor – Extra 50% off sale (ends 10/12)
- Banana Republic Factory – Up to 50% off everything plus extra 25% off your $125+ purchase
- Boden – 10% off new styles with code; free shipping over $75
- Eloquii – Extra 50% off a lot of sale items, with code
- J.Crew – 40% off sitewide
- J.Crew Factory – 50% off entire site, plus extra 25% off orders $150+
- Lo & Sons – Fall Sale, up to 35% off
- M.M.LaFleur – Save 25% sitewide
- Neiman Marcus – Sale on sale, up to 85% off
- Spanx – Lots of workwear on sale, some up to 70% off
- Talbots – 50% off 2+ markdowns
- Target – Circle week, deals on 1000s of items
- White House Black Market – Buy one, get one – 50% off full price styles
And some of our latest threadjacks here at Corporette (reader questions and commentary) — see more here!
Some of our latest threadjacks include:
- What to say to friends and family who threaten to not vote?
- What boots do you expect to wear this fall and winter?
- What beauty treatments do you do on a regular basis to look polished?
- Can I skip the annual family event my workplace holds, even if I'm a manager?
- What small steps can I take today to get myself a little more “together” and not feel so frazzled all of the time?
- The oldest daughter is America's social safety net — change my mind…
- What have you lost your taste for as you've aged?
- Tell me about your favorite adventure travels…
Christina
Just saw this deal at Gap and thought I’d pass it on to anyone wanting to get this cardigan. It’s only good today (12/17). After today the code will get you 20% off.
Head over to Gap online and receive an extra 25% OFF and FREE Shipping on your order of $50 or more when you use coupon code, GAPSAVENOW at checkout.
Laura
got the sweater and used the code – thanks!
Nicknamie
Sorry for the immediate threadjack, but I need some real-time advice!
A couple of weeks ago I was honored to get an interview for a real plum position. All the finalists were invited for the same weekend, and they coordinated a dinner for all of us and the selection committee. Everyone got to know each other, present their work, and exchange ideas. I didn’t ultimately get it, but was proud to have made it to the final round.
So this morning, they sent out an email with everyone’s contact info, presumably to facilitate future collaborations between us. This is great, and with any luck I will run into these people again (both my peers and the senior folks) through publishing, conferences, etc. The one issue: I am listed under a very informal nickname that I absolutely never use. It’s also very girlie. Let’s say my name is Roxanna, and I’m listed as Roxie. Or my name is Candace, and it says I am Candi. There’s nothing wrong with these kinds of names if they are what you use, but I am telling you–not even my parents or husband have ever called me by this name. I have no idea why it is there, in a formal email with everyone’s professional contact information.
So if I am going to do anything about this, I need to do it now. I assume it isn’t worth it, and definitely don’t want to seem bratty, but I also don’t want to make a mistake that will cause confusion or embarassment in the future. Am I right to just let it go? What would you do? Does it matter that I am one of the only women involved, among either interviewees or interviewers?
JJ
My immediate reaction is that I definitely wouldn’t send a “correction” email to the entire group. In the future, as I came in contact with the people on the list, one-on-one, if they referred to me as “Roxie,” I would probably tell them (in a joking/self-deprecating way) that I actually prefer to be called Roxanne.
Having a name that shortens to very, very girlie name that I really don’t like…I feel your pain.
Advice...
I personally would just let it go, but if you do have further contact with any of these people, simply say, “I actually prefer to go by [insert full name].
Advice...
My additional comment is not showing up (it’s being moderated for links, I’m guessing), but, whatever you do, just don’t become an Elizabeth/Liz Becton! (She this woman who became kind of infamous for a brief moment in D.C. over a particularly harsh exchange when someone mistakenly called her Liz instead of Elizabeth. If you Google her name, you can read the e-mails on Politico. For some reason I find them hilarious.)
Hilarious
As an Elizabeth who goes by Beth, I find it even stranger when someone calls me Liz -it’s two assumptions rather than one! Needless to say, I found that email exchange to be hilarious (though also, you know, crazy).
Anon
Tough one. I think I would send a pretty immediate e-mail to the whole group under the guise of how much you enjoyed meeting everyone and hope to collaborate in the future and then casually mention that your name was incorrectly listed in the previous e-mail or that you typically go by X or whatever. Like, the focus of your e-mail should be on making the connections but with a casually thrown in, “Oh, and people usually refer to me as X instead of Y,” or whatever. I definitely think it’s worth straightening out the problem early but in a very casual, non-confrontational way.
Anonymous
^ This, but instead of “people usually refer to me as x instead of y” I’d go with something like “I go by Y” or “I prefer Y” because that’s more active. But it will be good to have a “looking forward to blabla” context for the email, or wish them a happy holiday season or something. But you’re right, correct it ASAP before it gets into people’s address books! I can’t tell you how many people shorten my name without asking.
Janie
Agree with this. Whichever method you choose, you should correct the error and do it now. They got your name wrong and that’s all there is to it. I bet some of the people are reading that email and kicking themselves for calling you the wrong name – when they really had it right.
ABC
Or if you’re looking for a more passive way to address it, you could send an email to the group saying how great it was to meet everyone and you hope to stay in touch etc. and then just sign-off the email with “Roxanne”.
Ru
This is what I would suggest.
SuzyQ
I would do this also. You’re not going to embarrass anyone and it achieves your objective.
Anonymous
The only problem with this is the vast majority of people won’t notice it w as signed Roxanne.
anon
I’d reply-all (wow, that’s the first time I’ve ever ever given that advice) with “Correction: my name is Candace. No one has ever called me Candi,” and soften the language as you prefer.
Think about it this way: You’re not correcting a la “ew, that version of my name that I don’t even use is uber-girlie.” You’re correcting a la “Oops, my name is listed as Danielle when it’s really Kara.”
K
Wow! As a Kara IRL (and who knows very few other Karas), I’m just shocked that “Kara” is the sample name you came up with! Fun!
Anon
As another Kara IRL, who was just about to share my problems with Car-a and Care-a, I was also amused to see this. And then even more amused to see another Kara. Hi!
Anonymous
I’d reply all with a comment like:
“It was great to meet you all. I look forward to seeing you again soon, and have a happy holiday!
Best,
Candace
ps – I go by Candace, not Candi.”
or
“Happy holidays, everyone! I look forward to seeing you in the new year. By the way, in case there’s any confusion, I go by my full name, Roxanna, not Roxie.
Best,
Roxanna”
I wouldn’t make the whole point of your email correcting your name, because that seems overly blunt, but I do agree it’s crucial to make the correction, especially because if you don’t make the correction these people are likely to pass on your incorrect contact info to others. So I’d just add it in as an aside, but make sure it’s perfectly clear.
Anon
I like the second version from Anon 11:19 above.
Recently I addressed a colleague in email as Jackie instead of Jacquie – she corrected me promptly and politely and I’m glad to know. Especially since in your case the shortened name seems to have a less professional sound to it, I would set the record straight once and asap.
Anonymous
I think it comes across as petty to reply all just because someone called you Meg instead of Megan. Just roll with it and correct in the future. If someone sent me the email correcting it I’d just think they were anal retentive. Get over it. no harm, no foul.
Nicknamie
I would agree if it was like Meg/Megan. That’s like Sam/Samuel or Ben/Benjamin. But this is an extremely diminutive nickname. I think that makes it different. It’s not a matter of being offended or a “foul,” I just want to present myself appropriately and consistently.
Anonymous
There is a harm. Your name is your brand and the way in which you’re known to the rest of the world. You’re entitled to control your own brand. It’s pretty obvious from your comment that you have a simple enough name that no one’s ever done this to you.
Anonymous
You’re an assuming ass. And no, my name can easily be shortened. I just dont make a big stink out of it. And the branding thing might be the lamest thing I ever heard. I bet you rock your wanna be ivy school free backpack to network, dont you?
Eponine
There’s definitely an ass on this thread, but it’s not Anon 12:52…
JAS
I agree with this, maybe add a couple lines about something you enjoyed taking about at the meal or something like, “I’m looking forward to hearing everyone’s perspective when the X case gets decided/results of x study are published/etc” Because I think you would want to connect with these people anyway that’s a perfectly appropriate email. and just casually drop in your ps abut your name. Also, if you REALLY want to soft-pedal it, you could put it in the guise of “my complete contact info is: “Roxanna Smith, 123 St, …” with a different email or additional phone number or something to the one sent out.
Nicknamie
OP here. I just looked at the e-mail again, and notice that there is a “Mike” listed, and also that the sender–a man–signed off with a shortened version of his own name as well, and no last name (though of course we all know it). However, in both cases, these are the names by which these guys introduced themselves. So this makes it warm, but not incorrect to those individuals. This doesn’t change anyone’s opinions, right?
anon
While I hadn’t posted before, the “Mike” email doesn’t change my opinions about sending an email such as those suggested above. All it shows why he guessed that you used the short version of your name.
Anonymous
I agree. This changes nothing. See Danielle/Kara above.
Nicknamie
OK, as the world turns:
1) I got an opening when someone else replied all to say nice to meet you all, etc., and attached a link to a relevant article for all of us to take a look at.
2) I replied all with the same sentiment, a thanks for the article, and a brief and polite–but clear–clarification of my name at the end.
3) The lead guy involved in all of it replied personally to me, immediately, to apologize for listing me under the wrong name, wished happy holidays, and referred to a future event where we will see each other next.
Success, I think. Thanks ladies.
Anonymous
Absolute success. Congrats Roxie :P
Nicknamie
;)
Louise
A good ending to your dilemma! My name is often misspelled as Lousie, and I never could think of a good way to correct that. Some people are just lousy typists.
Mella
Wow, I love that cardigan, though my first reaction was “not sure if I’d pay $60+ for it” given my experience with Gap clothes. I clicked through to see it in purple, and the pic of it in purple makes the fabric look really thin and cheap. Look at the hem edge on the model’s right/our left. Would be curious to hear others’ reactions, especially if any of us gets to the mall and tries it.
anoner
It does look thin, but I’m not sure if I would translate that to cheap. Personally, I would prefer a wool blend, if its going to be that thin, rather than cotton.
Kelly
I was definitely shocked at the price, especially since the sweater doesn’t look all that substantial. The price seems a bit higher than typical Gap price points, but maybe I haven’t been to a Gap in too long? I’d certainly check this out in the store before I shelled out the $60 for it.
Lyssa
I don’t think of Gap as “cheap” clothing, but I thought that 60 was a little high for a cardigan, particularly a more casual one, in general. (I had the same reaction a few bargain Fridays back when Kat posted a cardigan from the Limited for 50- that I just didn’t see that as a bargain, more of a middling price).
Seems to me that Kat’s toned down the splurges a little bit (they’ve backed down to “I couldn’t see myself spending that” from “I can’t believe anyone would spend that!”), but her bargains have inched upwards.
2L
I live in a town where Gap is about the most stylish option for a 25-year-old law student so I shop there a lot. $60 is around average for their clothes now, but there are many sales, especially now. Last time I was there they had 60% the second item you purchase. I also had a coupon for 45% off one full priced item. The quality is kind of hit or miss and, while I haven’t actually seen this sweater in stores, I would probably not pay full price for anything there.
Counting the days till vacation
I’m about to go on a nice vacation that involves an all day plane trip. Anyone want to recommend a book to read for pleasure?
I am a very nervous passenger with a short attention span so mundane and silly works best. To give you an idea, I really enjoyed reading “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” on my last trip. (Yes, I know, I should be banished from womankind for liking that book.)
Any recs?
Ru
Sh*t My Dad Says is pretty funny, but it’s short.
Janie
Seconded!
MM
I’m not usually a “chic lit” fan, but I borrowed an Emily Giffin book from a friend and surprised myself by liking it so much that I read all her others. So, if you haven’t read them yet, I’d recommend: Something Borrowed, Something Blue, Baby Proof, and (to a lesser extent) Love the One You’re With.
associate
exactly what I was going to say.
Mella
In addition to the book – if you have an iPod or an iPhone, may I suggest RelaxMelodies. The couple of bucks I paid for the premium edition have redeemed many times over. I like to layer a music loop over a binaural beat, and then pick up my book. Really helps my brain settle down.
http://www.ilbsoft.com/ (I don’t work for them. I don’t get credit for you checking them out. I just love the app.)
Anonymous
If you like the Dexter series or idea, I recommend the books – great airplane/fast/fun books.
Lizbet
Janet Evanovich books make me laugh out loud, and are all in paperback. :)
Anonymous
Candace Bushnell – light and airy. Dan Brown – not so light, but very fast and will keep your attention.
KM
Bridget Jones’ Diary and Bridget Jones the Edge of Reason. They’re easy breezy and laugh out loud funny. Also, the books — so much better than the movies!
AIMS
This would be my rec! No attention span required, you will stay focused.
Anon
I second the Janet Evanovich suggestion. All are quick reads and very entertaining. I also agree with the suggestion from Books below for Chelsea Handler’s books.
FWIW, I flew across the US on Wednesday and was reading the fourth Twilight book. Its cheesy, but I’m fully engaged in the story so it fully holds my attention.
JJ
Anything by Jen Lancaster (it’s “chick-lit” but more edgy). My favorite book of hers is “Such a Pretty Fat.” I devoured those books.
stc
I do love her (and her blog)-she makes me happy.
Anon
This! I love these books and her blog. And I was nearly as embarassed reading it in public as “I hope they serve beer in hell,” though I loved that, too. Apparently Tucker Max has a second book coming out, as well.
Blonde Lawyer
Do you have to read her books in order or do they make sense regardless of which one you pick up first?
Anonymous
It makes the most sense to read them in order, since they show the progress (for want of a better word) of her life. Very funny!
Anonymous
John Grisham is great plane reading if you like engaging but simple stories.
Anonymous
The Sex Lives of Cannibals is a fun, easy read, but also will get you in the vacation state of mind!
CFM
My guilty pleasure was the other boleyn girl, very soap opera-y.
Lobbyist
Stuff White People Like
Shopaholic Books by Sophie Kinsella
2L NYC
2nd this — sophie kinsella’s other books are great too!
Nonny
If you like reading travel books while travelling, how about anything by Bill Bryson – he is VERY funny….
Emily I
David Sedaris! (Mostly autobiographical essays – very, very, very funny). My husband and I got “Holidays on Ice” as an audio book to listen to while we drove to his mom’s for Christmas last year. I had read it before, but I find his books are ones you can enjoy again and again. I can’t wait to read his new one.
Anonymous
I second this recommendation. And his books are all collections of short stories, so it is easy to put them down and come back to them later if you need to. Only problem is that you may disturb other people on the plane by laughing too loud :)
If you are looking for something more serious, I would recommend Margaret Atwood (Handmaid’s Tale or Oryx and Crake would be my first choices, if you haven’t already read them). Or The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver.
Vamp Lover
I think that the Sookie Stackhouse series (the books the HBO series True Blood is based on) would be a good travel read if you’re into vampires and other supernatural creatures. They’re not too long, but they’re pretty well written and very entertaining. Most of them are paper backs now and they’re real portable.
kz
I second this, and the Bill Bryson recommendation above. Bill Bryson’s travel books are absolutely hilarious–as in, I occasionally get funny looks while reading them on trips because I’m laughing out loud.
HaileyQ
I wanted to like the Sookie Stackhouse books after watching a few episodes of TB…but they turned out to be romance novels. Buyer beware.
K
I’m a huge Bill Bryson fan also, but if you’re looking for something light, funny, and a little fluffy, I love Marian Keyes and Anna Maxted.
JessC
I’ll recommend books by Christopher Buckley. Familiar with the movie Thank You for Smoking? It was based on his book by the same name. He writes political satire (and, yes, he’s the son of William F. Buckley) and is absolutely hysterical. I never read Thank You for Smoking, but I did read No Way to Treat a First Lady. I’ve also got his most recent book, Supreme Courtship (a story involving a TV judge getting nominated to the Supreme Court) but haven’t had the chance to read it yet.
Louise
Anything by Bill Bryson. He’s a very funny guy.
Books
Chelsea Handler’s books might be good if you haven’t already read them. I know she’s kind of over-exposed at this point, but I still find her books hilarious.
Books
Oops, this was supposed to be a reply! Sorry about that.
Lol
I am reading these now. I literally laugh out loud on the subway.
Regular Poster - Anon for this One
For all of you lawyers out there, I have a question for you. I know someone who was at BigLaw for 3 years in general litigation and then clerked for 3 years (for 3 different judges) for the lifestyle. Now, she just completed a third round of interviews for a civil AUSA position which she’ll likely get. She has no trial experience, hasn’t conducted a depo in over 3 years, and I don’t think she has ever run her own case. So, how is she qualified to become an AUSA? I just don’t get it. (Disclaimer: yes, I know this post sounds totally snarky but I really am perplexed.)
Anon
So few otherwise well-credentialed lawyers get that kind of experience early (sadly), I doubt they can insist on it. I think the deal with the government is that they throw you right in.
Anonymous
She has experience and brains. And yes, you sound incredibly snarky and jealous. Be happy for others. Don’t try to bring them down in a blog about fashion.
Anonymous
The agents run the cases, not the lawyers! It is not that easy to get a job as a prosecutor and you don’t know everything about her. I worked for the state attorneys office for four years as a paralegal before law school – not everyone I know, knows that. As for being snarky, this is the perfect place to ask!
Anon131
It does sound a little snarky, particularly because you say she clerked for three years “for the lifestyle.” I clerked as well, and I will say that many clerks work harder than biglaw associates — and for much less money. I would be offended if someone suggested that I clerked “for the lifestyle,” even though my clerkship was on the easier side, hours wise.
I think that Anon at 12:14 is right — it’s very difficult to get that kind of experience, so it’s not necessarily a good proxy for whether someone will make a good AUSA. The fact that she has other credentials–like three clerkships, which cannot have been easy to get–does suggest that she is smart, capable of learning new things, willing to dive into an area where there is a steep learning curve, etc. All of these things suggest she is qualified to be an AUSA.
Regular Poster - Anon for this One
Oh sorry, I did not mean to suggest that all clerkships are for “lifestyle” – I know several people whose clerkships were tougher than working at Biglaw. I’m just saying that for her, that was the reason she gave us for leaving Biglaw and her reason for taking a third clerkship when she (in her own words) would not be learning anything new. Sorry my posting was not clear on this point.
AEK
I understand the type of frustration you’re feeling, but I think you are being really narrow about what qualifies someone to become a trial lawyer. A monkey can take a deposition; it’s smarts, good work ethic, and good judgment that employers want. The experience can only come with, well, experience.
AUSA is an elite job, especially in major cities. They are looking for elite resumes. Most people I know who’ve made it have some combination of biglaw litigation at a better firm and federal clerkships, which sounds pretty close to what this woman has. There are of course other roads to the AUSA position, but the big firm/clerk road is well traveled. Not to mention that her former firm probably had former AUSAs as partners, and she could get recommendations from 3 judges. Not surprised at all that she got her foot in the door.
No, she might not have a ton of hands-on experience, but she has lots of indicators that she’s smart and capable and kind of fancy. And that’s just from what you’ve mentioned in your tiny post! I also really wouldn’t discount the clerking—“lifestyle” job or not, the woman has seen lots of trials, motions, arguments, briefs, and she knows what works and what doesn’t.
AIMS
I know someone who was on the hiring committee for this, and he said that the standard person who gets hired is “2-3 years big firm; 1-2 fed. clerksghip.”
Sounds like your friend is perfectly qualified.
Anon
I do think that you sound a little snarky and/or jealous, but at the same time, I think it’s good to get those snarky feelings off your chest sometimes. I support your use of this forum to do so!
(signed, Someone who lost out on an offer to a girl with no experience, who partied through law school, middling grades, had no journal, etc, and who, oh, by the way, just happened to be banging one of the attorneys at the firm. Life ain’t fair, but I get the urge to vent.)
Anonymous
It’s not that snarky so long as you only express happiness for her to her face – it’s fine to wonder how someone got their job. Frankly, not that many young lawyers have serious trial experience because biglaw almost never lets associates do any actual trial work, and having clerked for 3 years means she really knows the ins and out of federal cases. The latter especially will make her a huge asset to the USA office. Plus, she probably has a prestigious educational background, which never hurts.
D
In BigLaw, she probably tagged along to trials/depos, did depo summaries, etc. As a clerk, she’s probably watched a bunch of lawyers in trials, read depos for SJ motions, and is familiar with motions practice. Not quite the same as doing it yourself, but a learning experience nonetheless. Doesn’t the AUSA have a training program anyway?
Lawgirl
I can relate to the envy & frustration. AUSA is a tough job to get. Even tougher than Main DOJ. As I understand it you need the *right* school, connections, politics, and clerkship to have a real shot. The AUSA’s office isn’t the only door you have to walk through to be a great trial lawyer….
Anon also
I was an AUSA and a DA. DA was more fun.
SuzyQ
Just curious – why did you leave these jobs? A lot of my friends consider these to be their “dream jobs”.
Regular Poster - Anon for this One
Thank you for all of your posts here – even the ones reminding me that I’m being snarky – it’s true and I’ve said so myself. And yes, she has brains, a good pedigree and is a go-getter – my question was more why she would be more qualified than, say, the poster from yesterday who has 7 years of experience at Biglaw and can’t find another job. Anyway, to change the topic somewhat, I don’t know why, but I keep comparing myself to this person and I wish I could just stop because it’s not productive and I really should be happy for her and her successes. I would not trade my life with hers (or anyone else’s) for even a minute, so what is my problem?!? Do any of you feel this way towards someone else and if so, how do you stop?
Anon
I have been there, and I’ve never been able to figure out why I chose the people that I did for this. (And usually in the same circumstance, where I wouldn’t ever trade lives with the person.) I think it usually just comes out of being in competition (or perceived competition) with the person for some reason at some point, and thinking that you’re a better choice objectively.
I think the best way to get away from it just distraction. Once you move on and away from each other, it fades.
surrounded by lawyers
Well, you sound very self-aware about this, so I think you’re halfway there already! I think other than that, you also nailed an important antedote: remembering that if you were her, you wouldn’t be yourself. If you had everything she has, you’d have few of the things you have.
It’s also, I think, in some ways even more impressive/admirable than success, when people handle disappointment with grace and humility. For example, I recently got very much dissed by a colleague who has achieved something I have not (yet). It was actually a major confidence boost for myself when I responded with total neutrality–pretending not to be insulted when that was clearly the effect of his statements to me. After that, I feel like I’m the one who “made it” in comparison. I know your friend isn’t doing things like this, but the point is, much of it is about attitude.
Samantha
My dear OP, we all resent to different extents those who seem not “to deserve” what they got. It helps me to remind myself in these situations that they had *other* bad things that happened to them (even those we don’t know about) that we’re thankful didn’t happen to us !
In other words, our desire for ‘fairness’ (of outcome over effort, for example) is behind our singling out some people to resent or be jealous of. One way to overcome it is to recognize there are other dimensions of fairness. e.g. She may have had an easy route to a job, but she doesn’t have a fulfilled personal life, whereas you’re so lucky to have your special someone. Or, she may have had an unhappy childhood. Overall, it all evens out – some good luck, some bad. Karma is real. :)
Ballerina girl
Putting aside “to snark or not to snark” (because I don’t really care either way–it’s not like we know you or her), I think your answer is that she clerked for three years and worked in Big Law. The real questions are: what school did she go to and did she graduate at the top of her class? If the answer to those questions are “top school” and “top of her class” then you likely have your answer there, fair or not.
Anon
I interned at an extra prestigious US Atty’s office this summer and this was more or less the profile of every single AUSA there – federal clerkship (or more than one) + biglaw. They did a talk where they told us what they look for in AUSAs and made it fairly clear that the federal clerkship is practically mandatory, and more than one is better.
Anonymous
I would hate to be an AUSA. Making deals with drug dealers to put other drug dealers away? It sound positively awful. I applied for federal public defender and was so sad that I didn’t get it with the 125K plus salary. But, I think I would have hated federal court. Awful.
wow
And you’re ok representing the drug dealers? I’m a federal clerk and can’t believe some of the horrible defendants we see who show no remorse whatsoever. Give me an AUSA position over FPD any day.
chix pix
This gray sweater – I just bought something similar and I turned it into a suit by matching it to a pencil skirt of the same color and a shell of the same color (my sweater does not have the bi-color panels). Wilth the right necklace and shoes it really works well – and is so comfortable.
a
To answer some of your questions about the cardigan: I bought this cardigan in the store the other day when they were having a buy one get one 50% off sale. I think it is very soft, not too thin (because of the double layer), and I don’t think thing it seems cheap. And good price if you use the coupon code listed by a poster above (25% off)!
Liz
Super cute sweater. It looks like it would also be really comfy.