Professional Frump: What To Avoid
This post may contain affiliate links and Corporette® may earn commissions for purchases made through links in this post. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Here's a fun topic that we haven't discussed in years — what makes something frumpy? How can professional women avoid frump?
I agree with a lot of what I said four years ago in terms of avoiding professional frump — primarily:
- wearing clothes that don't fit — this is a big one! A lot of women end up in too tight/too short pants, dresses, and skirts because they've gained a few pounds and refuse to recognize it. Meanwhile, a lot of women start out in pants, dresses, and skirts that are too big — baggy, not tailored — because they think that's “professional.” We've talked about how blazers should fit, how suits should fit, how pants should fit, where your pants hems should be, and which common tailoring alterations you should consider — we've also talked about when to give in and buy a bigger size.
{related: how to avoid MOM frump}
- not knowing your body. Certain cuts and fabrics are going to look amazing on tall, skinny women — wide, flowy trousers, for example. Others will look amazing on short, curvy women — for some reason I think of ankle pants and fitted cardigans in the mix here. And some things are going to look horrrrrible on both of those women. I do believe that if you really love a trend that is not immediately flattering, that you can hunt and hunt for the perfect ____ or find a way to style it that looks great on you — but it takes work. The easiest way to get dressed and be stylish every morning (and avoid frump) is to really know your body and what works on it — kind of like having a uniform, sadly! — and only deviate for special, must-have trends.
- wearing the wrong shoes with the wrong pants (or the wrong hem length). Shorter pants lengths are more popular than they were back in 2010, when we wrote the original post, but I still say that if you have a pair of flowy or bootcut trousers that you can wear with flats, they're going to look dumb with heels.
- bad underwear — I've said it before, I'll say it again: I think a new bra or two every six months is a worthy splurge. You should also assess other undergarments for smells, (visible) stains (e.g., on a camisole or full slip), frayed edges, and more.
- looking unkempt in general — I'm sure I've been guilty of this during some of my random “let's eliminate shampoo” experiments with my curly hair. Dirty hair, frizzy hair, crazy gray hairs sticking up everywhere — this all sort of helps with a general perception of “she's frumpy.”
- I'm not saying you have to have a smooth blowout every day, but I do think that finding a NEAT hairstyle for you — even if it's a low ponytail with a bit of hairspray to smooth the flyaways — is important, particularly if you're in a transition period.
- (If you're going through a lot of changes with your hair — such as after having a baby or during other big hormonal changes — the “wispies” may be a particular problem, and a bit of hairspray will go a long way towards making you look put together. I'm never quite sure if the wispies are broken hair or new hair growth, but you know what I mean: they're not quite bangs, they're not necessarily gray, but whatever they are, they're not willing to lay flat.)
This is a reader favorite hair clip!
Lipstick on collars, collars that are half-sticking out and half-sticking in, skirts that are sticking to pantyhose… all of this contributes. (Just think of the teacher in Clueless!)
Last time we discussed this, a lot of readers had very specific “FRUMP ALERT” type of things — chunky heels, cropped pants, and more — I'm curious to hear what people think gets an automatic frump flag in 2014. Ladies, over to you — which looks are hopelessly frumpy? Which looks should you avoid if you don't want to look frumpy?
I tend to think “frump” when it’s apparent you haven’t updated your hair or wardrobe since the early 90s. Some pieces will go the distance for sure, but not your entire wardrobe wholesale.
I agree. I don’t think everyone has to be wearing the absolute latest trends (and let’s be honest some trends are not always work appropriate), but if you buy some new pieces yearly you’ll look more current.
Agree–regular, good haircuts go a long way to looking stylish and avoiding frumpiness. At least at my age–can’t throw it up in a messy bun anymore. I quit coloring my hair several years ago and firmly believe that if you’re gonna go gray, you gotta keep it styled. I get plenty of compliments on my gray hair, so I’m taking that to mean my theory is true.
From personal observation, button-down shirts that don’t fit perfectly have a high degree of frump. Particularly gapping across the buttons, too tight in the arms, wrong sleeve length, too short in the torso so they untuck constantly, etc. There is just too much that can go wrong on most women for them to be worth the risk. YM (and body type) MV, so go for it if you can rock them.
I agree about button-front shirts, especially those made of cotton and traditional tailoring – they never look right on me. And I’ve not worn one since 2004. I do wear silk button front shirts but they are unlike those worn by men.
I have noticed this as well. Right out of law school, I splurged and bought several Brooks Brother’s button front tailored shirts. Even with further tailoring, they have never looked “right” on me…I feel frumpy almost instantly.
However, I have slowly replaced them with silk button fronts and the difference is remarkable. A silk shirt that fits on the arms/shoulders but drapes well through the torso is ideal. More power to those who can wear a cotton button down, I have just learned that it is not a good look for me.
They work for me because I’m super-small on top, but if I tucked them in, I’d look frumpy. But in some workplaces, untucked=sloppy.
Agreeed — it took me a while to find my “brand” and size but now I only buy shirts from there (for the record, I’m a petite medium at Banana Republic). I still always have to wear a spanx cami underneath to ensure no gaping.
Yes. I have broad shoulders so button downs always restrict my arm movement. I have so many stretchy/other blouses that are great alternatives. Not to mention the gapping at my chest. Just seems like buying a bigger size and constant tailoring isnt practical for something that doesnt even look amazing on me.
I can’t do cotton button-downs. My upper arms are slightly big for my size and there’s nothing I feel frumpier in than a button-down that doesn’t fit. I could get away with untucked where I work, but I’ve been sticking to silk.
100% agreement about the classic button down shirt. They just never look “right” on me either and become frump in about 10 minutes. I don’t know how women manage to look sharp and pulled together in them. And if I try tucking them in I look about 20 pounds heavier!
I think there are 2 categories of frumpiness:
1) not knowing or caring what’s in fashion – many people in this group are not held up professionally by their frumpiness. They don’t care and everyone knows they don’t care. Many high achievers fall into this category (I’m not implying either correlation or causation).
2) wearing things that don’t fit or aren’t flattering, as Kat points out. The problem is that people in this group already think they know their body type and how clothing should fit – but they happen to be wrong.
I think this post more describes looking “unkempt” not necessarily frumpy. Sometimes plus size or tall size clothing can be pretty boring, basic and yes even frumpy. I feel frumpy when I’m wearing pants that are too big on me. Usually something I only realize after going to work in them and they stretch out or I’ve lost weight.
Finally, I’m frustrated because lately it doesn’t matter what I even wear to work because I end up putting my North Face fleece on over it because I’m always so damn cold. Wearing a really warm sweater isn’t really an option because all of those are very thick and not great for spring/summer. Layering isn’t so much an option either because there’s only so many layering combinations that work for me and I still might not be warm enough. Sigh.
Well, throwing a fleece on it is def going to look frumpy! Warm pashmina, cardigan, blouse, camisole not an option? Or even one of those blazers made out of heavy fleece that Gap is selling now would look more professional.
Instead of the northface, why not invest in a nice wool peacoat. And for warmer months like now, a trench with a removable lining (like this one: http://www.londonfog.com/womens-fall-collection/london-fog-olivia-double-breasted-trench-coat-with-removable-liner.asp). Much less frumpy and a lot more work appropriate.
I only wear the northface with jeans when running errands on the weekends…
..but then I’m supposed to sit in the office in my peacoat? I’m at client locations that teeter between business casual and casual.
You sit in your office in a Northface? That’s really the case for a pashmina then…and maybe a space heater. I’d definitely think its frumpy to wear a northface in an office, even a casual one.
I can’t carry a space heater around the country/greater Chicago area. My actual outfit is always cute/in style. I look great today.
I’m at a different client site every week and it’s difficult to carry several things from home to client. I don’t have a desk that I can just leave stuff at. I’m looking into pashmina scarves/blankets. I’m always wearing a blouse and cardigan so I’ve already exhausted options there. Blazers are never warm enough for me. I’ve looked into silk long underwear but then that sounds difficult in the event that I do get warm.
Maybe it would be worth it to invest in a nice cashmere cardigan. Expensive, but warm.
I was going to suggest a cashmere cardi as well. And maybe a warm undergarment?
Or silk base layers. Very thin, you can wear one under a blouse or button-down. Agree with cashmere sweaters, pricey but they last forever.
1. Get a giant pashmina–one made out of actual wool or a wool blend. Let it live in your purse.
2. Look into warmer cardigans. Again, made out of actual wool. I had a couple of heavy-weight cardis that rotated through my former, frigid office, that I would throw over whatever I was wearing that day when I had to sit at my desk for extended periods of time. I liked slightly oversized, quasi-wrap ones. Throw it over your arm when transferring client sites.
Throwing out some options below. I don’t automatically hate North Face, but when I worked someplace where I was wearing a blouse and a cardigan every day…North Face would not have been the style I was trying to project.
And yeah, I’ll +1 Aerith’s suggestion to throw money at this, if you can. I got an expensive-for-me super-heavy cashmere cardigan while I was working in said arctic office, and that thing was (and still is) worth every. single. penny. I paid for it.
Cashmere wrap with cute detail: http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/la-fiorentina-pompom-cashmere-wrap/3254904?origin=category&BaseUrl=Scarves+%26+Wraps
Not usually a fan of branded stuff, but for some reason I’m really digging this wrap: http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/burberry-check-merino-wool-scarf/3359932?origin=category&BaseUrl=Scarves+%26+Wraps
This looks like a great option (at a great price) (with fun colors) (actually I wish it came in not-plus size) if you wear plus size: http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/sejour-wool-cardigan-plus-size/3765612?origin=category&BaseUrl=Sweaters
I need to get more scarves to use as blankets. I’ll acknowledge that. Thick cardigans that are also usually longer lengths happen to look terrible on me too so then I think I end up entering the frump zone once again.
I guess I’m just wrestling with the fact that it’s a huge pain to carry stuff around from client to client. Driving my own car gives me more freedom, but commuting via public transportation makes it very difficult. I can only bring so many things when I travel. I don’t think a North Face is the worst thing in the world when I have minimal control over my environment.
This is the highest-fashion functional blanket I’ve ever seen: http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/theory-casterly-cotton-cashmere-cardigan/3739855?origin=category&BaseUrl=Sweaters
Nope, North Face is certainly not the worst thing in the world. But I got the impression from your post that you frustrated from putting a North Face over your cute outfits every day? Just trying to find some options for things that would be less, well, North Face, and more business casual, since I’ve never worked in a biz-cas office where North Face would be appropriate. And if you’re just sitting at a desk anyway, does it matter so much that you don’t like the looks of long cardigans when you’re out and about? Also, just saying…it is not objectively more difficult to carry a wrap or a heavy cardigan from place to place, than it is to carry a North Face.
But obviously, you do you. Not trying to jump down your throat. I’m having a slow day at work and love big scarves and cardis, so I will stalk this sh*t online for DAYS.
No i appreciate it. And I certainly appreciate the vicarious shopping. I just was surprised by the reaction that a north face is inappropriate for work.
Well I picked the wrong time of year to act on me being freezing all the time. I think I’m going with one of these until I find something better http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/nordstrom-tissue-weight-wool-cashmere-wrap/3196871?origin=category
And the Smart Wool Secret Sleuth socks. The cashmere cardigans never did anything for me. I’m probably a lost cause with bad circulation.
Silk underlayer, wool or wool/cashmere blend lightweight sweater. Socks instead of bare feet in shoes. Scarves.
You may want to look into thyroid testing if you are really cold all the time.
Agreed. I’m looking into silk long underwear and more flat booties that I can wear with dress pants because this is a difficult footwear issue in the summer. I’m awaiting thyroid results currently. I feel like I’m an extreme case. Me and another girl in our practice are notorious for being cold.
I got a 100% wool wrap from AT years ago that sounds like what you need. I’d look into a high quality wool or cashmere wrap.
I have a beautiful cashmere shawl in red from Brooks Brothers that my hubby gave me years ago. I think it’s actually called a “rhuna” or something similar on their site. I wear it over blazers, sweaters, blouses and it’s super warm, yet lightweight. It was expensive but I’ve had it 10 years and it looks like new. I highly recommend it!
I agree. I have one too, but mine is black. I got it last year on clearance and it’s awesome. I practically won’t get on a plane without it.
I hate to let my father know he’s right, but I’m always amazed at how much warmer I am when I wear a tucked in camisole (or undershirt, in dad speak). It traps my heat against my body, and unless I’m working somewhere that is having an HVAC malfunction, I’m usually not too hot or cold.
You should try the silk long underwear. I live in Maine now (and grew up in Chicago). I am always cold, even sometimes with the long underwear. So I don’t think you’d have to worry about getting too hot and having to remove them. Except in the summer. Air conditioning is the worst. I interned in the Loop one summer and I was freezing in the office and I baked while going out to get lunch with my friends.
High quality wool wrap. You only need one and can bring it on the airplane when you travel.
ADEA layering tops are amazing too. They have a mock turtleneck you can wear under a blazer for warmth. If that and a wool wrap do not keep you warm, then you may have another issue going on. My mom has really poor circulation and is underweight and is always freezing, for example.
Uniqlo makes HeatTech underlayers. I can’t speak for them, but the Airism base layers are AMAZING. I was cool, comfy, and not stinky during this recent heatwave, so I can only imaging the warm ones working even better.
+1
I was going to recommend this. I wear a long-sleeve heattech shirt under my sweaters if I don’t want to wear a super thick coat over my outfit. What’s nice is it keeps me warm in the office, when it looks awkward to wear my coat. Definitely recommend these!
Sorry but I think fleece is definitely frumpy, especially at the office! Agree with the cashmere comments – buy a nice cashmere wrap and a cashmere cardigan and you will be just as warm and will look much better.
Second this. There are light weight summer cashmere cardigans, etc. that would be warm and look professional.
Silk scarves. I did a month of grand jury duty in a very cold room. A silk scarf around my neck made a huge difference, yet was easily folded and stashed in my purse for taking a walk on a balmy day outside. And they don’t look as out of place in the summer as wool or cashmere.
SmartWool Secret Sleuth socks + wool insoles (SuperFeet makes them, plus a European brand that I can never remember) make flats and loafers significantly warmer.
I am a fan of silk tanks, too, but totally understand not wanting to become a sweaty puddle when you commute.
It won’t work for meetings, but a heating pad on your desk chair can work wonders. More portable than a space heater, and quiet.
In addition to having your thyroid checked, make sure you are staying hydrated. I get chilled a lot faster when I am not sufficiently hydrated.
I agree about the scraf idea. If my neck is warm, I’m generally warm. Same thing with my feet–which is why I RARELY go barefoot. I almost always have at least footie socks on with my flats or some type of hose/sock.
Could you get a company branded fleece? I’ve finally managed to get hold of one from my company and so even if its not the ‘smartest’ thing in my wardrobe, I’m at least flying the company colours.
I agree with the ill-fitting button ups. Also button fabrics like a poplin tend to wrinkle really easily. I also think cardigans or sweaters that are starting to stretch and pill–no matter how comfortable–add to the “frump” factor.
Big, long over sized cardigans, even in the “correct” size look horribly frumpy on me. But I am on the short side so they swallow my frame.
These look terrible on me also. I’m tall but thin so even the right size just looks stupid on me
Me too, and I’m tall. I wish that trend would die.
Speaking of frump and ill-fitting clothes, the most embarassing thing happened today at work.
It’s warm at last, so I’m wearing a dress sans tights. I’ve lost a bit of weight, and apparently my underwear are now too big. I was walking down the hall when they suddenly slipped off and down to my knees. I’m pretty sure several people noticed as I awkwardly tugged them up and ran to the bathroom. Aaahh!
At least there was a midday shopping excuse to buy some pretty new pairs.
Sigh. Happy Monday.
Oh, man, I snorted my coffee! So sorry about your underwear (and yes, I’m snickering again!) but congratulations on losing enough weight to make it happen! That is seriously impressive and deserves a really lovely pair of skivvies.
I’ve had tights give up the ghost in the middle of the grocery store. I waddled home like a penguin with my tights between my knees, and then ran into my manager who wanted to have a chat (I had a live-in post in a student building). Mortifying!
I had thigh highs do that walking w/ my boss from a law firm to city hall for a meeting. I was pinching them through my skirt trying to hold them up. I snagged some elastics from a clerk and made a make shift garter belt w/ them.
Ha! This happened to me with tights too, but fortunately it was at the end of the day!
Hahaha this is hilarious, if thoroughly embarrassing to happen to you. The elastic in a pair of tights apparently dissolved in the washing machine, and when I walked home from work (took the bus in the morning), they slowly slipped down. I tried to grasp them through my skirt and pull them up inconspicuously as possible, but by the time I got home, the crotch was at my knees. So awkward!
That happened to me last summer walking from work to the train. There is absolutely no way to stop this and fix it discreetly. It turns out that the elastic gave up the ghost. So, I spent some money and bought a couple pairs of really nice underwear that I wear only with dresses.
Accessories matter.
I’ve been making more of an effort to make sure outfits are fully pulled together lately — like today, I’m wearing a light blue oxford shirt with a navy pencil skirt and realized I should add a belt before I left this morning. I think accessories really make or break an outfit and make someone stylish. Everyone has a black sheath dress for instance and if you just wear that and black heels, pretty boring — add a necklace, belt and colored heels and you look more put together and like you’ve tried a bit more.
I admire people who can accessorize, because I’m not good at it. I’m particularly bad with belts and scarves. I do think good shoes (or at least shoes that look good) make a difference.
I’ve been following Extra Petite and Cap Hill Style for a while now and they have really good tips. I especially love this post from Extra Petite about many ways to wear a sheath dress. The first photo she shows is just it plain and she looks okay, but kind of forgettable. The rest are styled and make a true statement: http://www.extrapetite.com/2014/03/wardrobe-staples-series-styling-sheath.html
Cap Hill Style has a great series called “Outfits vs. Clothes” that really helps me put together accessories, and led me to realize I needed more varied jewelry. There’s also a formula she gave that helps me give my outfits oomph: basic neutral base piece + interest piece (color/pattern/shine/texture) + completer piece (blazer/cardigan/belt) + accessories.
http://www.caphillstyle.com/capitol/2014/04/02/work-wednesdays-decoding-the-mystery.html#comments
On “completer pieces”, the cardigan doesn’t always do it for me, I find. I have tried belting, and buying more structured cardigans, but it never feels as done as a blazer. Anyone have suggestions on other completer pieces, or how to “bring up” a cardigan? I can’t wear wool, so that is a bit limiting.
I try to keep cardigans with outfits that are otherwise sleek. So sheath dress – yes. Pants and top – no. But in general, you’re right, cardigans just aren’t as structured as blazers. Otherwise, wearing a cardigan like it’s a top, not a blazer, helps.
Follow style blogs. You will absorb their style. I didn’t know how to accessorize for years but after perusing enough blogs for long enough (and magazines) you just sort of absorb what you like/dont like/what works
I’m past the point of needing to accessorize – I have learned to choose outfits that don’t need belts; I wear colors and necklines that are flattering. I have embraced my inability to accessorize.
Seriously – on me, belts and scarves slip out of place, and jewelry is uncomfortable. I’ll wear a simple necklace if an outfit absolutely needs it, but mostly, I’m good to go. Plus, I save money and time.
I hear you. I only like belts and scarves for their functionality not decoration. I love jewelry but I often end up taking my bracelets off when I get to work and so many necklaces are too heavy or my hair gets caught in them. You seem to have it down.. beyond that, I suggest wearing interesting patterns and textures. I don’t think my leopard print cardigan needed any help from jewelry today. Same with a polka dot sweater.
I think boring and frumpy are different. Frumpy, to me, means Not Updated. Frumpy is not okay. But boring is always okay.
I like this distinction. You could definitely call my work wardrobe boring, and you’d be right, and I wouldn’t be insulted. “Frumpy,” I’d take issue with and would hope you were wrong.
I had a coworker whose style was boring and frumpy. She always wore tan and gray suits with muted solid shells and chunky square-toed heels. The items all looked like quality items but none of them fit her. Even her haircut and hair color were boring and frumpy. She was the sweetest person but I really wanted to take her to a tailor stat.
Accessories can matter, sometimes. I think if you’re wearing well-tailored pieces though, they stand on their own with minimal jewelry and accessories.
I don’t have pierced ears. Do naked ears make people look frumpy? Am I going to have to do it before I enter the workplace? Ack. I’m slowly getting into wearing necklaces and bracelets though.
I wouldn’t say naked ears are frumpy at all… so wouldn’t worry too much about that one.
Not wearing earrings is fine. I find I’m overwhelmed by to much jewelry, and will wear a necklace or earrings, but never both at the same time.
I’d say “absolutely not.” I love my pierced ears and would as soon show up at work naked as earrings-less, but I can’t imagine thinkign naked ears on anybody else was frumpy.
My mother often said “A lady would rather leave the house naked than without earrings!” I’ve internalized this, but agree it’s completely unnecessary to have pierced ears for professionalism.
No permanent body modifications are required to look professional.
My mother refused to let me get my ears pierced as a kid on the grounds that I would catch them on things and rip my lobes off. And when I turned 18 and could do it myself, I found that the brainwashing had worked and I no longer wanted them pierced. So far I have managed to remain gainfully employed.
Similar story here – I think I might have asked once when I was about 7 and my mum said ‘when you’re older’… and now, I don’t feel the need to have my ears pierced.
Thanks everyone, you’ve put my mind at rest.
+1, none of the women in my family have ears pierced and we are all gainfully employed. :)
I have my ears pierced and can’t tell you the last time I wore earrings. They just bother my ears, so I don’t wear them. I’m also gainfully employed.
I agree with all of the other p’oster’s. You do NOT have to have peirced earing’s to be fashionabel, tho I had mine done when I was a littel GIRL, so no issue’s here. Nowaday’s so many peeople have multipel peirceing that they look like they are from another PLANET, if NOT another contenent. FOOEY! I do NOT want to look like some kind of voodoo doll with earing’s in my NOSE and belly button! DOUBEL FOOEY ON THAT!
Dont even get me started on this b/c the next thing KAT will ask about is tatoo’s! I do NOT want anyone puting any tatoo’s on ME! Rosa was about to get one when she was in college but I had a fit and told her that she would look TAWDREY if she had one, even a socalled ‘tastful” one — like a heart or something on her ankel, but I still said NO WAY HOZE when she asked my opinion. I know she is glad she never had one b/c Ed told her that he had onley 3 or 4 NO-NO’s: Those were 1) smokeing, 2) drinkeing to excess 3) noze peirceing and 4) any tatoo’s.
Rosa never smoked even once, and she hardley even drink’s a martini, she only has her ear’s peirced (once in each ear) and she did NOT do tatoo’s. Ed said that these 3 thing’s were thing’s he would NOT tolearate in a spouse, so Rosa would NEVER be even married to Ed if she got a tatoo. FOOEY on anyone who doe’s these thing’s b/c they can NOT get a guy like ED to marry them. I conclude if you want a decent guy to marry, do NOT do any of these thing’s and undo whatever you can if you want a guy like Ed. YAY!!!!!!!
Maybe I am the odd one out, but I cringe if I ever forget to put in a pair of pearls, I think I look schleppy and plain.
Top frump factors to me:
Along with wearing pants that are too short, I would add wearing pants with an unflattering rise for your body type (either ultra low or ultra high)
Glasses that look too round and big– 80s ish and not in a deliberate way
Mid-calf hem length broomstick style skirts or maxi skirts–great for weekends, but look totally off in the workplace
I’ve always thought of frumpy as function being the only consideration. My SIL buys only Lands End clothes in washable fabrics – mostly cotton or cotton-poly blends – and while they “fit” her, they don’t flatter her figure one bit. All of her clothes are eminently practical, though. And she wears them until they are stained and threadbare. She trunps frump.
Stacy London on What Not to Wear calls those the ‘I give up’ dresses. They’re a dress, so you’re technically ‘dressed up’ but its basically a big piece of cloth sacking. Horrible.
Oh gosh, the ladies at church with the hose and opened toe shoes or sandals! I’m finally on board that you can wear tights with peeptoe booties, but it’s not a look I would rock. We even have ladies who wear black hose with white shoes. And they say I’m boring because they think I don’t wear color!
I think, in general, clothes or hairstyles that look really dated or ill-fitting.
Thank you! I have a friend from college who always wears nude hose with sandals to weddings, and it ages her terribly. (It’s not like it’s cold out — I think no one told her she doesn’t have to do this.) It looks like she’s stolen fashion ideas from my grandmother because she used to do the same thing. No toes showing + seams of stockings.
I think these two posts are really helpful re: frump
The first from Putting Me Together shows how small details really make a difference between frumpy and not: http://www.puttingmetogether.com/2013/07/shabby-to-chic-buying-right-pieces.html?utm_source=feedburner
This one from Extra Petite is all about how proportions of clothing (specifically skirt length) makes all the difference re: frump: http://www.extrapetite.com/2010/05/finding-your-ideal-skirt-length.html
Really, frump is about looking like you don’t really care about what you’re wearing…
1. Pants that are too short.
2. Polo shirts with logos, even if it is a customer / vendor.
3. Wrinkled linen pants.
4. Turtlenecks and v-neck sweater vests
5. Cropped pants
6. Knee high stockings
Question about # 6: how do you know when someone’s wearing knee-highs, and what makes them frumpy? I assume you mean with pants… with a skirt “frumpy” would not be the first thing going wrong! Is it because that the bare leg / bare foot thing is
“in”?
I assumed they meant with skirts (how would you know with pants?).
Personally, I think “panty-hose” and other stockings really are frumpy. Yes, some offices require it, but for those that don’t ugh no. And agree with PP about them with open toe shoes. Just no.
I’ll also add this:
Tights after it starts getting warmer. Sorry, if its 70 degrees out I think you look weird wearing tights.
This might be generational but I am chuckling at putting “panty hose” in scare quotes! I’m not always on Team Hose, but I definitely consider them a legit option.
I don’t know about it being generational. I’m 29, which I think means I’m technically a millenial or whatever, and if I’m wearing a skirt to work, I am wearing pantyhose. I personally can’t even contemplate going bare-legged in any situation that wasn’t entirely casual.
Maybe it’s just because my mom always wears hose when she’s dressed up (and she’s generally the least appearance-focused person I know. In fact, the fact that my mother wears pantyhose isn’t an argument against their frumpiness, now that I think about it.) Or maybe it’s a Southern thing.
Someone should do a sociological study on pantyhose wearers vs. non-wearers. I would totally read that report.
People wear them with skirts! It looks terrible. I think it’s because if your skirt is just past your knee and you stand still, you could think it’s not visible that you’re wearing knee highs. A woman I worked with did this all summer. It looked terrible and oddly perverse. This is why it’s always important to move around in front of the mirror!
People do wear them with long skirts! Also, knee highs tend to be low quality hose, there is a certain graininess and color that is always a give away.
I agree that wearing hose can be fine, you need to have the exact right color and texture for your skin and your outfit, which is more difficult than it sounds. I wear neutral hose rarely, only if the outfit and hose can pull it off, but I do wear black or navy hose when sometimes tights don’t seem quite right.
Hanes Silk Reflections are a good style, and affordable, especially when the drugstores have a sale :)
They are often on sale at onehanesplace dot com.
Two thoughts:
#3 is an inevitability unless you starch them until they stand up….so is there a happy medium?
#5 – I assume you mean pedal pushers and not the adorable ankle pants that are everywhere this season.
Avoid Lands End people!!
I have to agree – I wore a lot of Lands” End when I was a SAHM and constantly postpartum or early pregnancy, etc. I don’t own a single thing Lands’ End now, but that may be a function of their overly generous sizing. I buy Lands’ End for my boys all the time :)
Just wear LE things that fit and flatter the body you have (also the rule for ~LE things).
I used to think I was a LE medium because small was for teeny people and large was for large people; hello, I’m an XS in their sweaters (and if they sold cashmere in juniors sizes, I’d be all over that). And I will never, ever give up my LE rashguards in the summer. So, it’s like using metrics — the same digits may not work everywhere, size-wise.
But that’s what works for me. I wish Theory would make things for someone with lumps and a butt. Another key thing (esp. with LE though, since they can clothe you for a lifetime): dress for the age and stage you are; dressing +/- 20 years from your actual age (or +/- 1 from your life stage) looks awful.
I am a normal size 4 on top (6 on the bottom) and their XS tops, even petite, are huge on me. I see they have a few 0 and 00 woven tops, so who knows, a small person might be able to wear those. Their girls’ tops are all too boxy.
I agree. Land’s End isn’t the problem, per se. The sleeveless ponte dress with the pockets is very flattering. And their swimwear is great, but some of their clothes are boxy and shapeless. Find the items that fit and pay attention to the reviews
Yes, and the reviews give an age range. If you are 30 years old and all of the 4 star reviews are from the 60+ set – that LE item probably isn’t for you.
Strongly disagree. As a plus sized woman, often their stuff is the only place I can find something that isn’t polyester and showing too much cleavage.
If you’re wearing camp/outdoor inspired gear to work, that’s inappropriate not frumpy.
Me too. With the caveat that like ANY store, not everything in said store is made for you. My mom and I both wear stuff from LE, but some of the things that look great on her age me terribly and some of my things make my mom look like she’s trying to dress younger than she is because of the cut/print.
And I really don’t care if people are too small for Lands End! Cry me a river. Like clothing from any other store, if it fits and flatters you, it probably not going to look frumpy.
Gasp! LE carries some of my favorite basics. I could never give up their sheath dresses, cardigans and rash guards! (I know we are not talking about swimwear here – but for pale people like me, this is the only way I can enjoy the sun.) It is all in the styling and fit – if you compare their size chart with other brands, LE is usually one to two sizes off.
I can’t size down two sizes when I’m starting with their smallest size (usually a 4). And I’m a normal-size person, not a waif.
They are expanding their size range – they now carry 00 and 0 in their more popular items.
That’s good to know!
I hear you! At least we can shop most anywhere else. I hate it that some stores, where I’m a 10 for my generous hips, only run up to a 14. They are missing a good chunk of the people who could buy their things!
I will confess to occasionally trying to shrink some of my older LE cashmere (but darn it, the quality is so good that I haven’t been successful).
I purchase Land’s End in size small, and then dry them on high the first few times I wash them. This seems to work! Land’s End has some cotton cardigans that I like, they are a bit boxy, but are better than other options. The ones from Eddie Bauer look good in the morning, but they stretch during the day, which is just odd.
I feel frumpy if I don’t wear anything structured. I have a Banana Republic wrap dress that I don’t think looks right without a blazer. I’m not sure why I think that – maybe not enough straight lines to make me look “sharp”?
I know what you mean – I tend to not feel dressed ‘properly’ if I haven’t got any structure to my outfit – even on a casual outfit for university. Hence skinny jeans rather than my ‘boyfit’ ones (which are oh so comfortable) and my trench coat rather than the waxed cotton things which are everywhere.
I agree about the structure thing. Also, I think that adding an extra piece really helps an outfit look pulled together (and isn’t frumpy just the opposite of pulled together?). A sweater or top with a skirt or pants is a fine outfit, but adding a blazer, cardigan, scarf, or other third piece (of clothing, or a prominent, part-of-the-outfit accessory) usually goes a long way to upping the pulled-togetherness. Maybe that’s why you feel like your dress needs the jacket.
In the early 200s (?2002), there was an exhibition in DC of the clothing of Jackie O. For each of many of her iconic outfits, there was an exhibit that showed the outfit, the accessories and some photos of her wearing it. The labels had lots of really interesting information in them, including descriptions of the internal structure of her clothing. If I recall correctly, there was a fairly lengthy description of the internal structure of the clothes she wore on the trip to India so that they would remain crisp in that heat. But there was also some discussion — new to me at the time — about how her clothes fit her better and she looked better in them than we all do now because they had infrastructure. I wonder whether women we see well dressed and well photographed on a regular basis (Duchess Catherine comes to mind) have the same thing going on.
I’m pretty sure they do. I’ve recently been rewatching the TV series Pan Am and I think all the actresses for that were wearing authentic scaffolding, and the clothes do look good.
Don’t have time to google until I get home from work today, but I’m fascinated by this. The internal structure of clothing? Are you talking about boning, or firmly structured undergarments? (Bras that stand up by themselves, girdles, etc.) I’m picturing a skyscraper-like scaffolding inside Jackie O’s clothing now.
The big frump factor for me is when people are wearing those tops which are designed to have a seam under the bust, and it’s cutting right across their chest. It just looks awful.
Yes! Also, poorly-fitting br*s (sometimes seen with the empire-line top).
Poorly fitting undergarments of any type.
Definitely – good supportive garments can totally make a difference.
My top frump-getters:
– dated hair and/or makeup.
– clothes that don’t fit. Kat is absolutely right on this one. I worked with a woman once who wore everything too small. Perhaps her clothes had fit her at one point, I don’t know – but all of the buttons strained, all of the creases smiled, and every garment just looked tortured. Too big can also look frumpy, but it is rarer to see that.
– PRINTS that are not current. I am thinking of the floral print skirts I had in the 90s. Grunge has come back just a little, but not with the same prints – they are a little bit different now.
With ‘dated hair’ I’m reminded of a line from the Legally Blonde musical. Elle is talking about Warner’s new fiancée: ‘Both her hair and shoes are flat, and why is she so rude?’
Sorry, brief musical interlude there – but I think if what’s around your face (so, hair) looks up to date and ‘fresh’ then that makes the rest of the outfit look a whole lot better.
Some prints can be so tacky! Large floral print button downs untucked over elastic waist polyester pants. To me this combo is both dated and frumpy. It is also sad, you can not care about fashion but still care about fit. I find some women buy bigger, looser pieces rather than better cut or tailored pieces. A friend told me years ago that as we age the trick is tailoring, and staying away from clingy knits. This post does combine dated with frumpy, imo. You can wear the latest clothes and still look frumpy of the clothes are not right for you. It would be helpful for tips on how to update a wardrobe for different age groups, as lifestyle changes call for different types of clothes.
I do think frumpy is easiest to spot on the feet. Flat vs. heel isn’t the question, but more the style and structure of the shoe.
One of frumpiest shoes I see is the flex-sole, round-toe leather flat (similar to the foldable kind). Not any black flat goes with, say, a skirt suit, and these are prime offenders in my office; they basically look like soft leather Isotoners. I think a professional shoe, even if it has a rubber sole, has to be be structured at the heel and toe and made from a fairly solid material.
Which leads me to perhaps a broader theory that mismatching casual elements with dressy ones often looks frumpy. I often wear a tee under a suit, but I think it can’t be the same kind of tee I’d wear with shorts in the summer. I see that a lot. Or the cozy weekend sweater with tailored trousers; no good.
Related frumpy shoe – the rubber bottom, slightly wedge-soled, black shoe with a toe box as wide as the rest of the shoe, and sort of squared-off. I myself have a bit of a bunion going on, so I understand the need for wider toe boxes and am not saying only pointy shoes are non-frumpy, but I do think having the toe taper somewhat from the widest part of the shoe (around the metatarsals) looks much less frumpy.
Also, I know opaque black tights are much beloved, but I think opaque tights with round-toed flats/low heels and skirts look rather frumpy. Especially when the tights are kind of baggy around the ankles.
And especially when the skirt is below the knee.
I guess I’m frumpy all winter long then :) I almost always wear flats at the office, aim for skirts to be at the knee or a little longer (the highest I’ll go is just above the knee) and wear black tights from November – April. I don’t let them get baggy at the ankle though! And I try to wear colourful flats or ones with some detail – not just the plain stretchy black ballet flats that just look like office slippers. Good reminder that I need to refresh my collection of flats, as my favourites are getting worn.
(Totally not offended, don’t worry)
I also think a person’s height comes into play. I don’t wear really short skirts, but top of the knee compared to bottom of the knee is a world of difference on me.
I think with heels I would be better with skirts below the knee, and with flats it depends on the rest of the outfit.
I also avoid black skirt + opaque black tights with a light-colored top. That look is very unbalanced. I’d add a black or gray vest or cardigan if I really wanted to wear the black tights.
I disagree with this one. When it comes to tights I go by CapHillStyle’s 2 out of 3 rule: either the tights match the skirt or the tights match the shoes. I wear black skirt with black tights all the time and as long as its accessorized right, it looks great.
YMMV, obviously
I disagree with the black skirt/opaque black tights combo. I think this look can be very polished and on-trend.
I think this is a matter of proportion. If you are longer legged and short torso, then this will look very unbalanced. Also if you are top heavy, this will only make you look more so.
If you are 50/50 or long torso short legs, this looks good t0 great.
Squared-off shoes in general look more frumpy than round or pointed, I think.
I miss the 90s, when square and clunky shoes were Very In. Check out Ally McBeal!
To me they just feel like school shoes. For the five years of school uniform in high school I had the same boxy clump Clarks school shoes every time I needed new shoes. Urrrghhhh. (If you search ‘bootleg school shoes girls 2009’ you’ll see what I mean)
Rejoice, girl. They’re back. Donna Martin graduates!
I love those. I still have a pair of chunky Steve Maddens I wear on rainy days!
Casual items with more dressy or formal ones is tricky. It used to look frumpy but is now a current trend. See You Look Fab blog for examples. But I think iti can be hard to do right. You can’t just mix any casual and dressy piece together.
Sequins at the office look frumpy to me. A little too “cruise ship.”
I’ve been trying to put my finger on what makes something veer into frump category. My general problem is that cute generally = uncomfortable in my closet, while comfy = boring at best, and usually borderline frumpy. For instance, I see so many posts here about wearing a skirt with tights, shirt and cardigan here, but whenever I try that combo I look too “Amy Farrah Fowler” instead of “cute, stylish ‘e t t e”. I suspect the fact that I’ve never really figured out how to wear heels in the biggest part of this.
For me, skirt + tights + flats are always kind of frumpy looking. I really have to wear heels to pull off that look. I also think that the length of the skirt is key here. With opaque black tights, I think you have to do a slightly shorter skirt; with bare legs, you can go with longer hemlines.
For all the mystique about fashion, sometimes I’m convinced that it’s pretty much just a formula. Find the right length and cuts, put together a uniform, and never think of it again!
I wear flats with skirts and tights all the time. I find that having a pointed or almond toe on the flat reduces the blech factor. But then I’ve never really understood the Thou Shalt Not Wear Pencil Skirts With Flat Shoes directive.
Also, I just Googled Amy Farrah Fowler (not really a TV person) and I think the issue with her clothes is 1) fit, 2) fit, 3) fit, 4) proportion, 5) odd color and print combinations, and 6) getting a grade of D- in accessories. The best heel in the world wouldn’t rescue those outfits. But a tailor and an editing eye could.
K, now I’m just going to go to town on this. Wasn’t joking about the slow day. Look at this image: http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/236x/a7/01/51/a70151123482d33a690ffbf792d866fb.jpg
As is, she looks frumpy. End of story. But let’s break it down, top to bottom.
1. Her hair is way heavy and dragging the whole look down. Chop it to shoulder-length or pull it back in a pony/bun/twist. Instantly lightens up the look.
2. Take off that inexplicable green crew-neck.
3a-1. Keep the button-down. (This would be my preferred option.)
3a-2. Replace the cardigan with something in a solid color that will play nicely with the button-down’s print, and add a bit of pop–maybe a red or a purple.
3a-3. Add a brown belt, to tie in the shoes. No necklace. Maybe some flashier earrings.
3b-1. Keep the cardigan.
3b-2. Replace the button-down with a shell, or literally any other shirt in the entire world. I would go with a purple that coordinates with the stripes.
3b-3. Add a statement necklace to give the neckline some interest. Keep the rest of the accessories understated.
4. Keep the skirt.
5. Keep the brown tights.
6. Burn the clogs. Replace with a low brown wedge, without a rounded toe.
Mostly the same clothes. Very different outfit.
I agree the photo is frumpy, but disagree with why. To me, it’s mainly the proportion of the outfit and the colors. It’s also just way too casual. I’d change the color and material of the skirt, get rid of the button-down under the cardigan, or get rid of the cardigan, and wear a top that is much shorter. A skirt to the knees has to have a top that hits at the waist. Get rid of the shoes, but keep the tights.
I agree wih the length of her top. Skirts need shorter tops, pants need longer. Proportion is important when you don’t want to look frumpy IMO
In addition: update that poor woman’s eyewear!
Also, not all skirts are created equal. The best pencil skirts never look frumpy to me. They need to be made of great material and need to hug your hips without being too tight (can’t cut in under the butt). If they are too big, they can look very frumpy. If they are too tight, they look inappropriate.
When they fit correctly, you look feminine and powerful.
I think some colours and patterns will always look frumpy. I’m thinking particularly of washed-out or muddy-looking colours. Florals can look stylish but have a high frump risk factor. Other than that, clothes that don’t fit are a huge one, and I think generally looking “well-groomed” (or I suppose clean and tidy) makes an enormous difference. Neat eyebrows, and (if you choose to wear makeup) no ’90s makeup trends like powder blue eyeshadow.
I thought powder blue eyeshadow was a 70s thing!! Maybe both 70s and 90s?
I think it came back and haunted the ’90s for a while – or even early 2000s since it appears in the first season of Gilmore Girls a few times!
To me frumpy is the opposite of polished. It looks as though you didn’t put effort into yourself that day either through your wardrobe choice and/or the “rest” of you (hair, makeup, etc).
For example, I can wear the same ponte knit dress to work, but if I wear it with little to no makeup (for me this makes me look like the undead), my hair in a gym style ponytail, and slipper style casual ballet flats, I am queen frumpy. Sure the dress fits appropriately, but overall style-wise I look a little out of place.
If I wear the same dress, swap out the shoes for true flats, fix my hair and maybe hit my bags with some concealer or add some lipstick, I look like a whole new person.
Usually, frump is in the details.
Well said; I agree with all of this.
This is a very long list! There should be a “safe list” instead. I bet many people are reading this and thinking they should just give up now. Pantyhose=frumpy is surprising – if you’re uncomfortable with your bare legs or have a cold office are you in the pants-only zone? Imagine the men’s list is much shorter? Wrinkled, doesn’t fit, done?
Oh, my goodness. Men’s frumpiness. I see so much of that where I work. Just because a shirt has buttons and a collar doesn’t mean it’s a good shirt for work, and just because those wrinkled, khaki, cargo pants aren’t denim doesn’t make them business casual. And the shoes! There are some terrible shoe choices in my office. (Chief among them being poorly-cared-for dress shoes and wearing hiking shoes or bright, white sneakers.)
I agree with this. I see a LOT of frumpy dudes; lack of wrinkles and clothes that technically fit does not mean that the overall look isn’t frumpy.
My two cents on pantyhose:
I had quit wearing pantyhose because of reading this (matronly) basically everywhere.
Without them, I felt very uncomfortable and under-dressed.
And I noticed A LOT of other women (young ones!) wearing pantyhose, so I started wearing them again.
The only rule is if they are supposed to be the color of my skin, they really need to be as close as possible. I had to vet a lot of plasticy nasty frumpy ones until I found some that even a run is very hard to see because they are so close to my natural skin color.
So I would say, obvious, thick plastic “nude”, beige, or white hose, or any hose with runs are very frumpy.
Two offenders:
Ones that have become too tight (and they usually stop being long enough, which also makes the shoes look funny).
Ones that have become too loose, so they may have gone from mom jeans to belly-button range, but now the cr*tch is too low and the back of the pants are dragging on the ground (so they get wet when it rains, etc.); also throws the shoes off. Also, the person’s torso looks to be a mile long.
This! For both men and women.
I’m curious, Kat and others with curly hair – have you found any sort of updo or bun that looks professional and not matronly? The issue I find with thick, curly hair is keeping it contained (strong, longer length hairpins are a godsend) yet cute.
If you have suggestions in the form of links and tutorials, I’d appreciate them – thanks in advance.
Regardless of how you define the term, the things that I’d throw into the category:
– pants with saggy knees and bottoms; a lot of times these are washable fabric pants. I’ve noticed it with my Gap perfect trousers and now I only wear them after they’ve been freshly pressed post-laundry.
– blazers (and to a lesser degree pants) in outdated cuts.
– exaggerated collars (and personally I find the collar out above a blazer to look dated but I know opinion is split on that one).
– shoes — so many frumpy shoes out there! Most frequently defined by a square toe box and a chunky square, stacked heel.
– white or beige tights. Never saw that look right, esp. in an office setting.
– everything loose and untucked. I am a big believer in the if one thing is loose, something else should be fitted and vice versa formula for dressing. Kind of like the your dress shouldn’t be both short and low cut rule, but for frumpy clothes.
– jewelry can be dated, too. Doesn’t mean that very 80s necklace or ring can’t be worn, but you should probably wear it with more updated pieces.
– I’ll agree with the outdated hair comments, and I’d throw in hair that is very long but unhealthy-looking.
-Certain color combos, too. Of course that changes, but for me it’s usually black and brights, which wouldn’t be so bad in a modern cut but usually it’s black pants and a shoulder-padded 8-button neon green blazer.
Just a note for you lovers of black and brights like me: First, I agree the cuts need to be modern. Second, adding a dash of white (belt, shoes, blouse) really helps freshen up a black-and-brights look.
And as another lover of brights and blacks, I would add that modern also includes the bright color. Colors have seasons, too and some colors can be pegged to and era, like certain greens and pinks that scream 80’s to me and some yellows and bright blues that shout early to mid 90’s.
This is a topic near and dear to my heart since I am both getting older and have never really had a good since of personal style.
Frumpy as described as ill-fitted, out of date, and would be unattractive on anyone include:
Polyester pants in garish colors. Especially those with an elastic waistband. And the matching leisure suit top, too.
Wearing pants or skirts at the wrong place for you figure. If you are thick around the middle and/or have a tummy, run like the wind from high waistbands.
That hacked off “I give up hair cut” that flatters no one and does not look like a style so much as a cry for help. If you are going pixie, go pixie and keep up with the maintenance!
Over-dyed hair when you are also sporting age spots and wrinkles. Ditto with heavy make up that runs into said wrinkles.
Clothes that make you look larger. If you are not rail thin, stiff fabrics and oversized cuts are just going to make you look out of touch, like you are hiding in your clothes and otherwise, frumpy.
Beat down shoes are always frumpy.
Socks with sandals. (With the caveat of lace trimmed ankle socks with high heels. Then you look like an escort.)
There are some hats that only the Queen can rock.
Massively over-sized eyeglass frames (especially red ones). There are one or two icons who are known for this. For the rest of us, not only do we look frumpy, but like poseurs, too.
Too much jewelry. Layers of thick necklaces, big cocktail rings, big clip on earrings – especially on a small frame.
My litmus test for frump: does this make me look like I belong in a retirement community?
I’ll quit now.
What are people’s thoughts on seersucker? I have a orange seersucker blazer that I have worn with a khaki skirts, but lately when I look at it, I think it looks frumpy.
I love seersucker and think it’s not frumpy so long as blazer fits correctly. I have a tan and white seersucker suit that I wear in the summer but feel it’s still in style because of the cut (pencil skirt and fitted cropped blazer).
I’d hesitate to ever call seersucker “stylish,” but it’s certainly classic. I’d try pairing an orange seersucker blazer with a white skirt or cropped, straight trousers, or a grey sheath dress. Khaki is very 80’s at the yacht club.
I love orange and navy this year.
I love the “Yacht club” comment. Made me LOL. The cut is flattering, so I’m going to venture out and try it with a different colored skirt. Thanks for the input, ladies!
It could have more to do with the cut than the seersucker? I’ve seen some nice seersucker blazers that looked very stylish. Some of the guys at my church wear seersucker suits and, for the most part, they look very stylish.
Me, personally, I love seersucker. It makes me think of old southern money. I tend toward navy/white, kelly green/white, teal/white, etc. I had a purple/white that I adored, but I think would not look fresh now.
But recently I overheard a group of 20-something shredding it to bits (after having to Google to see what it is). Their consensus: Seer sucker is granny old fashioned. So know your office and area. :-(
Khakis on women. Full stop. They are frumpy. I know they are sometime required as a uniform, which is unfortunate.
I am shocked by some of the outdated clothes I’ve seen colleagues wear. Their wardrobes seemed to have stalled around 1996–square-toe/thick heel pleather boots, long leather coats (The Matrix?), long Stevie Nicks skirts, cable turtlenecks, stonewashed denim jackets (not the refreshed style that’s coming back–the list goes on. Nothing makes you look frumpier than dressing in the style of another era. They also don’t seem to update their hairstyles either…
Yeah, my neighbor (with whom I share a backyard), is soooo frumpy. Poor thing, her clothes just look cheap and dated. She has lost and gained weight and I think she thinks this is what she can afford. And the line of knee-highs drying every Saturday. She has a professional job but she just never looks pulled together.
Skirt length can affect frump massively. So-called midi skirts will make all but the trendiest (& probably youngest & skinniest) woman look frumpy. Those skirts hit somewhere below the knee to mid-calf, usually at a spot that makes a women’s leg look chunky & her proportion look weird (again, unless she’s amazingly trendy & can pair it with precisely the right top & she’s perfectly slim as well).
But most frumps who wear skirt this length aren’t wearing them because they “came back” — they still have them from the first time around.
Confession: I used to be a frumpy dresser.
The life-changer for me was this blog post —
http://www.alreadypretty.com/2011/01/being-intentional-with-black.htm
And the one linked in it —
http://www.alreadypretty.com/2010/09/adding-sass-to-work-wear-separates.html
Now, I’m not a fan of Sally’s style and I know she is controversial around these parts. I think it works for her and completely respect her vision and work. Personally, I wouldn’t wear most of the stuff she posts but I like her. But these posts helped me see for the first time how to put together an outfit. Even if you don’t like her style, I think these posts are excellent Outfit 101 classes for the fashion-challenged.
So with that in mind, I’d say the epitome of frumpiness is the Work Uniform. Black pants, black shoes, whatever shirt. Gray pants, black shoes, whatever shirt. Khaki pants, brown shoes, whatever shirt. You know the look. Most women have probably reached for that outfit out of exhaustion and apathy at one point in their lives, likely more often.
I think about those posts all the time when I’m getting dressed, and not just for outfits with black. Now, I try to make sure the neutrals in my outfit look like part if the outfit, and not just things I put on because going without pants is inappropriate. The overall effect is much more polished and stylish, and sometimes all it takes is a strategic use of a belt, or a great statement necklace.
It’s when a look screams ” work separates!” Is when you’ve got a frump problem.
New poster, long time lurker. Is there a forum where all you sharp ladies go to to give advice to clueless, frumpy messes like me? I need that web address!
I have a larger chest, 36C, and I find that cardigans look extremely frumpy. I can do tailored blazers, but I have tried and tried with cardigans and just can’t seem to make it work. I think cardigans are best for small chested women, especially if you’re wearing them with a button down shirt.